Literature DB >> 20188236

Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.

Hasan Suat Gokce1, Bulent Piskin, Dogan Ceyhan, Sila Mermut Gokce, Volkan Arisan.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The lighting conditions of the environment and visual deficiencies such as red-green color vision deficiency affect the clinical shade matching performance of dental professionals.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two sets of porcelain disc replicas of 16 shade guide tabs (VITA Lumin) were manufactured to exact L*a*b* values by using a colorimeter. Then these twin porcelain discs (13 mm x 2.4 mm) were mixed up and placed into a color-matching cabinet that standardized the lighting conditions for the observation tests. Normal and red-green color vision-deficient dental professionals were asked to match the 32 porcelain discs using standard artificial daylight D65 (high color temperature) and tungsten filament lamp light (T) (low color temperature) illuminants. The results were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA and paired and independent samples t tests for the differences between dental professionals and differences between the illuminants (alpha=.05).
RESULTS: Regarding the sum of the correct shade match scores of all observations with both illuminants, the difference between normal vision and red-green color vision-deficient dental professional groups was not statistically significant (F=4.132; P=.054). However, the correct shade match scores of each group were significantly different for each illuminant (P<.005). The correct shade matching scores of normal color vision dental professionals were significantly higher with D65 illuminant (t=7.004; P<.001). Color matching scores of red-green color vision-deficient dental professionals (approximately 5.7 more pairs than with D65) were significantly higher with T illuminant (t=5.977; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS.: Within the limitations of this study, the shade matching performance of dental professionals was affected by color vision deficiency and the color temperature of the illuminant. The color vision-deficient group was notably unsuccessful with the D65 illuminant in shade matching. In contrast, there was a significant increase in the shade matching performance of the color vision-deficient group with T illuminant. The lower color temperature illuminant dramatically decreased the normal color vision groups' correct shade matching score. (c) 2010 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20188236     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60020-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  10 in total

1.  Should prospective dental students be screened for colour vision deficits?

Authors:  F Mushtaq; R C Baraas; L M Al-Saud; I Mirghani; C van der Zee; E Yates; A Keeling; M A Mon-Williams; M Manogue
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  The Influence of the Extent of Color-Vision Deficiency on Shade-Matching Ability.

Authors:  Boštjan Pohlen; Marko Hawlina; Igor Kopač
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2019-09

3.  Comparison of Shade Matching Ability among Dental Students under Different Lighting Conditions: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Rizwan Jouhar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Color assessment of resin composite by using cellphone images compared with a spectrophotometer.

Authors:  Rafaella Mariana Fontes de Bragança; Rafael Ratto Moraes; André Luis Faria-E-Silva
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-04-05

5.  Influence of light source and clinical experience on shade matching.

Authors:  Cristina Gáspárik; Alina Tofan; Bogdan Culic; Mîndra Badea; Diana Dudea
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2014-01-30

6.  Perceived color shift of ceramics according to the change of illuminating light with spectroradiometer.

Authors:  Hyun-Suk Cha; Bin Yu; Yong-Keun Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Eyesight: a study of the staff of a dental school.

Authors:  Nicholas P Chandler; Andrew R Gray; Colleen M Murray
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2017-05-19

8.  Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching.

Authors:  Juan Reyes; Pamela Acosta; Dalina Ventura
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-07-23

9.  Frequency of Color Vision Deficiency among Saudi Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Najla A Alqahtani; Rafi A Togoo; Mashael M Alqahtani; Nouf S Suliman; Foziah A Alasmari; Faris M Alqahtani; Fahad T Alshahrani
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 10.  Novel Trends in Dental Color Match Using Different Shade Selection Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Louis Hardan; Rim Bourgi; Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska; Ana Josefina Monjarás-Ávila; Maciej Zarow; Natalia Jakubowicz; Gilbert Jorquera; Tarek Ashi; Davide Mancino; Naji Kharouf; Youssef Haikel
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.