Literature DB >> 3289811

Early temporary porosis of bone induced by internal fixation implants. A reaction to necrosis, not to stress protection?

S M Perren1, J Cordey, B A Rahn, E Gautier, E Schneider.   

Abstract

Stabilization of the fracture using implants requires contact surfaces between implant and bone. Such contact has been observed to induce bone porosis first seen at one month after surgery. Bone loss in the vicinity of implants has hitherto been explained as being induced by mechanical unloading of the bone (stress protection). Experiments in sheep, dogs, and rabbits combining intravital staining of blood circulation and polychrome fluorescent labeling of bone remodeling leads to the conclusion that early bone porosis in the vicinity of the implants is the result of internal remodeling of cortical bone and is induced by necrosis rather than by unloading. This theory is favored by the evidence that (1) the bone porosis is of a temporary nature, an intermediate stage in internal bone remodeling; (2) the pattern of the remodeling zone is closely related to that of the disturbed circulation, and not to that of unloading; (3) plastic plates may produce more porosis than steel plates; and (4) improved blood circulation using modified plates resulted in reduced porosis. The clinical relevance of these findings is related first to the temporary weakening of the bone, and second to the possibility of sequestration. Sequestration may be the result of intensified remodeling activity in the presence of inflammation or infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3289811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  The value of intramedullary reaming in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of long bones.

Authors:  P E Ochsner; A Gösele; P Buess
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Comparison of interface contact profiles of a new minimum contact locking compression plate and the limited contact dynamic compression plate.

Authors:  Yan Xiong; Yu Feng Zhao; Shu Xing Xing; Quan Yin Du; Hong Zhen Sun; Zi Ming Wang; Si Yu Wu; Ai Min Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Multi-point contact (MPC) osteosynthesis plate. 1: Animal experiment histomorphologic studies in the Göttingen minipig].

Authors:  J F Hönig; H A Merten; E Ficker
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1997-12

4.  Winter sports injuries in a snowless year: skiing, ice skating, and tobogganing.

Authors:  A Fiennes; G Melcher; T P Rüedi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-10

5.  Internal fixation of long bone fractures: concepts, controversies, debates. Interview by Elvira Stahl.

Authors:  H K Uhthoff
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Dual plating of humeral shaft fractures: orthogonal plates biomechanically outperform side-by-side plates.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; Arvind D Nana
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and recent developments.

Authors:  Hans K Uhthoff; Philippe Poitras; David S Backman
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  [Osteoinduction with the dog tibial defect model].

Authors:  U Schmid; F Thielemann; U Holz; G Herr
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1993-02

9.  Results of medullary wiring of 145 fractures of the tibia shaft.

Authors:  N Schwarz; B Schneider
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

10.  Comparison of a new minimum contact locking plate and the limited contact dynamic compression plate in an osteoporotic fracture model.

Authors:  Yan Xiong; Yufeng Zhao; Ziming Wang; Quanyin Du; Weijun Chen; Aimin Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.