Literature DB >> 3289769

A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour.

D R Gambling1, P Yu, C Cole, G H McMorland, L Palmer.   

Abstract

In a randomised, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 27 parturients in labour receiving epidural 0.125 per cent bupivacaine, were assessed to evaluate the efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) compared with continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA). Group A (n = 14) received a background infusion of 4 ml.hr-1 0.125 per cent bupivacaine, with further 4 ml aliquots, self-administered, as required (up to 16 ml.hr-1). Group B (n = 11) received a continuous infusion of 12 ml.hr-1 through the same PCA apparatus, but with the demand-button deactivated. Both groups were similar in respect to age, height, weight, duration and outcome of labour, birthweight and neonatal Apgar scores. Patients in Group A (PCEA) received significantly less local anaesthetic than those in Group B (11.2 vs 15.2 mg.hr-1). Pain relief was similar in both groups. Patients expressed overall satisfaction with PCEA, appreciating control over their own pain relief and less reliance on medical staff. PCEA is a safe, effective means of providing optimal analgesia during labour, with minimal local anaesthetic requirement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3289769     DOI: 10.1007/bf03010618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  9 in total

1.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Mishaps with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Obstetric analgesia. A consideration of labor pain and a patient-controlled technique for its relief with meperidine.

Authors:  J S Scott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1970-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A comparison of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia.

Authors:  P R Bromage
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1965

5.  Modification of IVAC 530 infusion pump for patient controlled analgesia.

Authors:  C P Bates; J A McEwen; K M Leighton
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in parturients receiving bupivacaine, chloroprocaine, or lidocaine--maternal, fetal, and neonatal effects.

Authors:  T K Abboud; A Afrasiabi; F Sarkis; F Daftarian; S Nagappala; R Noueihed; B R Kuhnert; F Miller
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Experience with self-administered pethidine with special reference to the general practitioner obstetric unit.

Authors:  N J Harper; J Thomson; S A Brayshaw
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Self-administered intravenous and intramuscular pethidine. A controlled trial in labour.

Authors:  J O Robinson; M Rosen; J M Evans; S I Revill; H David; G A Rees
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Apparatus for patient-controlled administration of intravenous narcotics during labour.

Authors:  J M Evans; M Rosen; J MacCarthy; M I Hogg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-01-03       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in analgesia during labour.

Authors:  R E Kan; S C Hughes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Bupivacaine versus bupivacaine plus fentanyl for epidural analgesia: effect on maternal satisfaction.

Authors:  J D Murphy; K Henderson; M I Bowden; M Lewis; G M Cooper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-09

Review 3.  Treatment options for the relief of pain during childbirth.

Authors:  P Brownridge
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor using ropivacaine and fentanyl provides better maternal satisfaction with less local anesthetic requirement.

Authors:  Miwako Saito; Toshiyuki Okutomi; Yuji Kanai; Junko Mochizuki; Akihiro Tani; Kan Amano; Sumio Hoka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Phase 1 development of an index to measure the quality of neuraxial labour analgesia: exploring the perspectives of childbearing women.

Authors:  Pamela Angle; Christine Kurtz Landy; Cathy Charles; Jennifer Yee; Jo Watson; Rose Kung; Jean Kronberg; Stephen Halpern; Desmond Lam; Lie Ming Lie; David Streiner
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Progress in analgesia for labor: focus on neuraxial blocks.

Authors:  J Sudharma Ranasinghe; David J Birnbach
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

7.  Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval.

Authors:  D R Gambling; C J Huber; J Berkowitz; P Howell; J E Swenerton; P L Ross; C T Crochetière; T J Pavy
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  A Meta-Analysis of Comparing Intermittent Epidural Boluses and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia.

Authors:  I-Shiang Tzeng; Ming-Chang Kao; Po-Ting Pan; Chu-Ting Chen; Han-Yu Lin; Po-Chun Hsieh; Chan-Yen Kuo; Tsung-Han Hsieh; Woon-Man Kung; Chu-Hsuan Cheng; Kuo-Hu Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  A randomized comparison of low dose ropivacaine programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labour analgesia.

Authors:  Oksana V Riazanova; Yuri S Alexandrovich; Yana V Guseva; Alexander M Ioscovich
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2019-04

10.  Parturient Controlled Epidural Analgesia with and without Basal Infusion of Ropivacaine and Fentanyl: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Garima Choudhary; Kriti Chaudhary; Ravi Shankar Sharma; Shobha Ujwal; Jagdish Kumawat; Rashmi Syal
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.