| Literature DB >> 32896106 |
Marina Makrecka-Kuka1, Stanislava Korzh1, Melita Videja1,2, Reinis Vilskersts1,2, Eduards Sevostjanovs1, Olga Zharkova-Malkova1, Pavel Arsenyan1, Janis Kuka1, Maija Dambrova1,2, Edgars Liepinsh1.
Abstract
The suppression of energy metabolism is one of cornerstones of cardiac dysfunction in sepsis/endotoxaemia. To investigate the role of fatty acid oxidation (FAO) in the progression of inflammation-induced cardiac dysfunction, we compared the effects of FAO-targeting compounds on mitochondrial and cardiac function in an experimental model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced endotoxaemia. In LPS-treated mice, endotoxaemia-induced inflammation significantly decreased cardiac FAO and increased pyruvate metabolism, while cardiac mechanical function was decreased. AMP-activated protein kinase activation by A769662 improved mitochondrial FAO without affecting cardiac function and inflammation-related gene expression during endotoxaemia. Fatty acid synthase inhibition by C75 restored both cardiac and mitochondrial FAO; however, no effects on inflammation-related gene expression and cardiac function were observed. In addition, the inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2 (CPT2)-dependent FAO by aminocarnitine resulted in the accumulation of FAO intermediates, long-chain acylcarnitines, in the heart. As a result, cardiac pyruvate metabolism was inhibited, which further exacerbated inflammation-induced cardiac dysfunction. In conclusion, although inhibition of CPT2-dependent FAO is detrimental to cardiac function during endotoxaemia, present findings show that the restoration of cardiac FAO alone is not sufficient to recover cardiac function. Rescue of cardiac FAO should be combined with anti-inflammatory therapy to ameliorate cardiac dysfunction in endotoxaemia.Entities:
Keywords: acylcarnitine; endotoxaemia; fatty acid oxidation; heart; mitochondria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32896106 PMCID: PMC7578905 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15809
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Changes in body temperature and blood glucose concentration 4 h after LPS administration
| Group | Body temperature, °C | Blood glucose, mmol/L | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Saline | 37.1 ± 0.8 | 6.2 ± 1.1 |
| LPS | Control | 35.0 ± 0.8 | 3.4 ± 0.4 |
| C75 | 34.8 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 0.7 | |
| A769662 | 34.9 ± 0.9 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | |
| Aminocarnitine | 32.2 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.9 |
Each value represents the mean ± SEM of 10 (saline control) or 11 animals.
Significant difference between saline control and LPS control groups (Student's t test, P < .05).
Significantly different from the LPS control group (ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test, P < .05).
FIGURE 1LPS‐induced increase in plasma markers, TNFα (A) and IL‐6 (B), and expression of genes related to inflammation in heart tissues (C). The treatment with aminocarnitine increased the expression of inflammation marker genes in the cardiac tissue (C). Each value represents the mean ± SEM of five animals for the plasma markers and 4‐5 animals for the gene expression analysis. *Significant difference between saline control and LPS control groups (Student's t test, P < .05). #Significantly different from the LPS control group (ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test, P < .05)
FIGURE 2LPS‐induced decrease in cardiac output (A), ejection fraction and fractional shortening (B). Treatment with aminocarnitine worsened the cardiac output (A) without affecting the ejection fraction and fractional shortening (B). Each value represents the mean ± SEM of 5‐6 animals. *Significant difference between saline control and LPS control groups (Student's t test, P < .05). #Significantly different from the LPS control group (ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test, P < .05)
FIGURE 3LPS‐induced inhibition of fatty acid metabolism in cardiac tissues. The [3H]‐palmitate oxidation in the heart in vivo (A) and the acylcarnitine profile (acetylcarnitine (B), medium‐ (C) and long‐chain (D) acylcarnitine) in the cardiac tissues. Treatment with C75 restored palmitate oxidation in the heart (A) without affecting the cardiac acylcarnitine profile (B‐D). The administration of aminocarnitine increased the content of long‐chain acylcarnitine (D) and decreased the medium‐chain acylcarnitine (C) and acetylcarnitine (B) contents, indicating the inhibition of CPT2‐dependent fatty acid metabolism. Each value represents the mean ± SEM of 5‐6 animals. *Significant difference between saline control and LPS control groups (Student's t test, P < .05). #Significantly different from the LPS control group (ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test, P < .05)
FIGURE 4LPS‐induced changes in mitochondrial energy metabolism pattern in cardiac tissues. Respiration rate (A) and flux control factors (B) in permeabilized cardiac fibres. LPS administration decreased fatty acid oxidation pathway‐dependent oxidative phosphorylation (A,B) and induced pyruvate metabolism stimulation without affecting other pathways (B). Treatment with both C75 and A769662 restored the fatty acid oxidation pathway‐linked OXPHOS coupling efficiency and subsequently decreased pyruvate metabolism (B). Alongside after aminocarnitine administration, the fatty acid oxidation pathway‐linked OXPHOS coupling efficiency remained decreased, and pyruvate metabolism was inhibited (B). Each value represents the mean ± SEM of 5 animals. *Significant difference between saline control and LPS control groups (Student's t test, P < .05). #Significantly different from the LPS control group (ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test, P < .05). FAO, fatty acid oxidation; F(N), fatty acid oxidation‐dependent pathway (FADH2 and NADH); N, NADH‐pathway; LEAK, substrate metabolism‐dependent state; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation‐dependent state; D, ADP; P, pyruvate; PC, palmitoylcarnitine; Rot, rotenone; S, succinate