Literature DB >> 32895742

Influence of the external cephalic version attempt on the Cesarean section rate: experience of a type 3 maternity hospital in France.

Benjamin Birene1, U Ishaque2, J Chrusciel3, S Bonneau2, R Gabriel2, O Graesslin2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define the effects of attempted external cephalic version (ECV) in a low-risk population for breech delivery in a maternity hospital where breech vaginal delivery is widely practiced.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective exposed-unexposed study including 204 patients presented with a live singleton fetus breech presentation on third-trimester ultrasound and who delivered at Reims University Hospital between January 1st, 2013 and July 1st, 2018.
RESULTS: 121 patients received ECV. Cesarean section rate was lower (OR with no adjustment 0.42 [0.24-0.76] p = 0.004) but without significant difference in the exposed patients after adjustment. This difference was significant between exposed and unexposed patients in the subgroup of 51 primiparous (OR = 0.14 [0.04-0.52] p = 0.002) and 51 multiparous (OR = 0.26 [0.08-0.89] p = 0.028) but not in the subgroup of 102 nulliparous. There was no difference in fetal impact other than neonatal management in the delivery room, which is less needed in exposed primiparous women. Attempted ECV significantly decreased the breech rate (72.5 vs 100%, p < 0.001). There were 7 (5.79%) complications. Three factors favored success: high uterine height (p = 0.011), a non-elevated BMI (p = 0.006) and an earlier term at ECV (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: The attempt of ECV in the Reims University Hospital does not significantly reduce the Cesarean section rate and has no effect on neonatal status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal version; Breech; Cesarean section; External cephalic version

Year:  2020        PMID: 32895742     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05765-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  AN ANALYSIS OF 16,327 BREECH BIRTHS.

Authors:  H S MORGAN; S H KANE
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1964-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  BREECH PRESENTATION AND PERINATAL MORTALITY; A STUDY OF 6,044 CASES.

Authors:  J E HALL; S G KOHL; F O'BRIEN; M GINSBERG
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1965-03-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Predictors of successful outcomes after external cephalic version in singleton term breech pregnancies: a nine-year historical cohort study.

Authors:  L Y Cho; W L Lau; T K Lo; Helen H T Tang; W C Leung
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.227

4.  Dysfunctional labor after external cephalic version.

Authors:  T Egge; C Schauberger; A Schaper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Improving external cephalic version for foetal breech presentation.

Authors:  H Zandstra; H J M M Mertens
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ambrogio P Londero; Anjeza Xholli; Claudia Massarotti; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Angelo Cagnacci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.493

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.