Literature DB >> 32895643

Genomic characterization of SARS-CoV-2 identified in a reemerging COVID-19 outbreak in Beijing's Xinfadi market in 2020.

Yong Zhang1, Yang Pan2, Xiang Zhao1, Weifeng Shi3,4, Zhixiao Chen1, Sheng Zhang1, Peipei Liu1, Jinbo Xiao1, Wenjie Tan1, Dayan Wang1, William J Liu1, Wenbo Xu1, Quanyi Wang2, Guizhen Wu1.   

Abstract

After 56 days without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases, reemergent cases were reported in Beijing, China on June 11, 2020. Here, we report the genetic characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) sequenced from the clinical specimens of 4 human cases and 2 environmental samples. The nucleotide similarity among six SARS-CoV-2 genomes ranged from 99.98% to 99.99%. Compared with the reference strain of SARS-CoV-2 (GenBank No. NC_045512), all six genome sequences shared the same substitutions at nt241 (C → T), nt3037 (C → T), nt14408 (C → T), nt23403 (A → G), nt28881 (G → A), nt28882 (G → A), and nt28883 (G → C), which are the characteristic nucleotide substitutions of L-lineage European branch I. This was also proved by the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the full-length genome of SARS-CoV-2. They also have a unique shared nucleotide substitution, nt6026 (C → T), which is the characteristic nucleotide substitution of SARS-CoV-2 in Beijing's Xinfadi outbreak. It is noteworthy that there is an amino acid D614G mutation caused by nt23403 substitution in all six genomes, which may enhance the virus's infectivity in humans and help it become the leading strain of the virus to spread around the world today. It is necessary to continuously monitor the genetic variation of SARS-CoV-2, focusing on the influence of key mutation sites of SARS-CoV-2 on viral transmission, clinical manifestations, severity, and course of disease.
© 2020 Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; D614G mutation; Genomic epidemiology; L-lineage European branch I; SARS-CoV-2

Year:  2020        PMID: 32895643      PMCID: PMC7467064          DOI: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2020.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosaf Health        ISSN: 2590-0536


After 56 days without COVID-19 cases, reemergent cases were reported in Beijing, China on June 11, 2020. From June 11 to July 4, 334 COVID-19 cases were reported in Beijing. Of the patients affected, 47% were Xinfadi market staff, while others were people who have had contact with the market [1]. Throat swab samples were taken from the patients, and environmental swab samples were taken from the environment in Xinfadi market, including the body surface of seafood, the channel at the gate of the stall, trash, outer surface of fish tanks, inner surface of refrigerators, etc. Total RNA was extracted from the supernatant using the Viral RNA Extraction Kit (Tianlong, Xi'an, China). The rRNA was removed using the TransNGS rRNA Depletion (Human/Mouse/Rat) kit (TransGen, Beijing, China), while the remaining RNA was incorporated for library preparation with the Illumina TruSeq DNA Preparation Protocol and sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 550 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with 150 bp paired-end reads. The full-length genome sequences were assembled using QIAGEN CLC Genomics Workbench (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Three full-le5ngth genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from the Xinfadi market were deposited at the National Genomics Data Center (two from patients and one from environmental sample) and three were deposited at GISAID (two from patients and one from environmental sample). At present, the widely accepted molecular typing method of SARS-CoV-2 is based on the difference of nucleotide at nt8782 and nt28144 in its full-length genome sequence. According to this molecular typing method, SARS-CoV-2 is divided into S-lineage (nt8782T and nt28144C) and L-lineage (nt8782C and nt28144T). It is speculated that S-lineage may be an older type. In Wuhan City, Hubei Province, S-lineage was the main epidemic type in the early stages of the outbreak, while L-lineage is currently the most prevalent lineage in the world. Therefore, most of the imported cases in China belong to L-lineage. Due to the global pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, imported cases have been frequently reported in China since March 2020. In order to better identify the SARS-CoV-2 types prevalent in various countries, according to the full-length genome sequence of the virus detected in imported cases in China, L-lineage were further divided into L-lineage European branch where the characteristic substitution sites were nt241(C → T), nt3037(C → T), nt14408(C → T), and nt23403(A → G) and L-lineage global branch with substitution sites other than those mentioned above. L-lineage European branch can be further divided into L-lineage European branch I (the characteristic substitution sites were nt28881(G → A), nt28882(G → A), and nt28883(G → C)) and L-lineage European branch II (the characteristic substitution site was nt25563(G → T)). The L-lineage European branch II can be further divided into L-lineage European branch II.1 (the characteristic substitution site was nt1059(C → T)) and L-lineage European branch II.2 (the characteristic substitution site was nt2416(C → T)). Because L-lineage European branch II.1 is a prevalent branch in America, it is also called the American branch. The nucleotide similarity among six SARS-CoV-2 genomes ranged from 99.98% to 99.99%. Compared with the reference strain of SARS-CoV-2 (GenBank No. NC_045512), the nucleotide similarity was 99.96%–99.97%. A maximum likelihood tree based on the full-length genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 was constructed using MEGA software (v7.0) [2] with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. According to this phylogenetic tree, all the six genome sequences belong to L-lineage European branch I (Fig. 1 ). SARS-CoV-2 in L-lineage European branch I are prevalent in Asia, South America, Africa, and North America, but mainly in Europe. This further confirmed that the outbreak in Xinfadi may be caused by the introduction of an infectious source. It is different from the virus that was prevalent in Wuhan in December 2019 and Beijing in February 2020, which belonged to S-lineage; therefore, it is suggested that the outbreak in Xinfadi did not involve the continued transmission of native virus.
Fig. 1

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the full-length genome sequences of the SARS-CoV-2. The tree was constructed using MEGA (v7.0) software with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The genomes of the SARS-CoV-2 from Beijing's Xinfadi market are highlighted in shades of yellow. The genomes of the SARS-CoV-2 from Beijing (Feb-2020) and Wuhan (Dec-2019) are highlighted in shades of grey and pink, respectively. The recent reemergence of SARS-CoV-2 in Northeastern China (Shulan and Heilongjiang) that was associated with imported cases are highlighted in shades of blue and green, respectively. S- or L-lineage of the SARS-CoV-2 are marked and colored on the right. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the full-length genome sequences of the SARS-CoV-2. The tree was constructed using MEGA (v7.0) software with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The genomes of the SARS-CoV-2 from Beijing's Xinfadi market are highlighted in shades of yellow. The genomes of the SARS-CoV-2 from Beijing (Feb-2020) and Wuhan (Dec-2019) are highlighted in shades of grey and pink, respectively. The recent reemergence of SARS-CoV-2 in Northeastern China (Shulan and Heilongjiang) that was associated with imported cases are highlighted in shades of blue and green, respectively. S- or L-lineage of the SARS-CoV-2 are marked and colored on the right. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Compared with the reference strain of SARS-CoV-2 (GenBank No. NC_045512), all six genome sequences shared the same substitutions at nt241(C → T), nt3037(C → T), nt14408(C → T), nt23403(A → G), nt28881(G → A), nt28882(G → A), and nt28883(G → C), among which nt14408, nt23403, and nt28881–nt28883 were nonsynonymous substitutions in ORF 1ab gene, S gene, and N gene, respectively. All the seven nucleotide substitutions are the characteristic nucleotide substitutions of L-lineage European branch I (Fig. 2 ). All six genome sequences also have a unique shared nucleotide substitution, nt6026(C → T), which is the characteristic nucleotide substitution of SARS-CoV-2 from Xinfadi market (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Nucleotide substitutions of six SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences identified from Beijing's Xinfadi market compared with the reference strain of SARS-CoV-2 (GenBank No. NC_045512). The characteristic nucleotide substitutions of L-lineage, nt8782C and nt28144T, are highlighted in shades of blue. The characteristic nucleotide substitutions of L-lineage European branch I, nt241(C → T), nt3037(C → T), nt14408(C → T), nt23403(A → G), nt28881(G → A), nt28882(G → A), and nt28883(G → C), are highlighted in shades of yellow. The characteristic nucleotide substitution of SARS-CoV-2 from the Xinfadi market, nt6026(C → T), is highlighted in shades of green. nt23403(A → G) is a nonsynonymous substitution in S gene, which leads to D614G mutation of S protein (indicated in red). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Nucleotide substitutions of six SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences identified from Beijing's Xinfadi market compared with the reference strain of SARS-CoV-2 (GenBank No. NC_045512). The characteristic nucleotide substitutions of L-lineage, nt8782C and nt28144T, are highlighted in shades of blue. The characteristic nucleotide substitutions of L-lineage European branch I, nt241(C → T), nt3037(C → T), nt14408(C → T), nt23403(A → G), nt28881(G → A), nt28882(G → A), and nt28883(G → C), are highlighted in shades of yellow. The characteristic nucleotide substitution of SARS-CoV-2 from the Xinfadi market, nt6026(C → T), is highlighted in shades of green. nt23403(A → G) is a nonsynonymous substitution in S gene, which leads to D614G mutation of S protein (indicated in red). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) It is worth noting that there is an amino acid D614G mutation caused by nt23403 substitution in all six genomes of SARS-CoV-2 found in Xinfadi market. The mutation from 614-D to 614-G occurred first in Europe, then in North America and Oceania, and then in Asia, and now this mutation is shared by all viral genomes in L-lineage European branch I. In a recent study, researchers found that a D614G mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 genome enhances the virus's ability to infect human cells, helping it to become the leading strain of the virus spreading around the world today [3]. The research team also proposed that D614G mutation pseudovirus was associated with higher infectivity. Quantitative analysis showed that viral particles carrying 614-G mutation had significantly higher infectivity titer than the corresponding 614-D mutation, which increased by 2.6 to 9.3 times, and was confirmed in a variety of cell types [3]. However, there is no evidence that it will lead to a more serious condition [4] because there is a big difference between the laboratory results and the changes in the actual transmission of the virus, which scientists have monitored. The complete genome sequence analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 from Xinfadi further confirmed that the source of the epidemic was not a new “overflow” from the host or intermediate host. The Xinfadi market has become the SARS-CoV-2 transmission “hub”, the most important reason being that the market environment is relatively wet and cold. One of the main characteristics of the virus is that it is sensitive to heat and not to cold. In such an environment, the virus can survive for a long time. Moreover, it is also closed and poorly ventilated, which also contributes to the spread of the virus. For example, if a person infected with SARS-CoV-2 sneezes, it is difficult to spread out, and the droplets may settle on the ground and pollute other places after flushing and sweeping. These conditions help to explain the occurrence of a large number of cases in a short period of time. However, this does not mean that the market itself is the source of the virus. The prevention and control of COVID-19 epidemic in big cities should be based on the principle of precise prevention and control. For example, areas with new confirmed cases can be classified as medium-risk areas. However, it is not necessary to freeze all the communities in medium-risk areas. Precise prevention and control involves the freezing of only the communities that have confirmed cases. Beijing's rapid, effective, and accurate epidemic prevention and control measures will draw on experience from other places and the future normalization of epidemic prevention. At present, with the rapid development of genomics technology, bioinformatics, and big data management technology, the new generation of genomic sequencing technology can achieve more detailed analysis of pathogenic microorganisms in specimens. Through bioinformatics analysis and high-speed operation of large-scale servers, massive whole genome sequence data can be processed and sorted, which can accurately trace the source of viruses and gain insight into their distribution. In the process of pathogen evolution, the virulence, pathogenic factors, and drug resistance genes are found, so as to grasp the pathogenic and drug-resistant mechanism of pathogens and provide a theoretical basis for the precise prevention and control of viral diseases. The field of pathogen genomics has been developing rapidly, and various molecular technologies are being integrated into the diagnosis, prevention, and control of viral infectious diseases. The integration of genomic technology with bioinformatics and epidemiology has improved the public health surveillance, research, and control of infectious diseases, and has played an increasingly important role in the world [5]. For example, the traceability analysis of SARS virus in 2003, the transmission of imported wild poliovirus in Xinjiang, China in 2011, and the traceability of Ebola virus epidemic transmission in West Africa from 2014 to 2016 have been widely used [6]. With the support of the National Science and Technology Major Project, the National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention has taken the lead in establishing a set of surveillance and traceability technology systems based on genome typing and clustering analysis algorithm of difference viruses including SARS-CoV-2, which can be used for early warning and prediction of viral infectious diseases. These systems were introduced in disease prevention and control centers at all levels in China, as well as scientific research and hospital systems. This will greatly improve the prevention and control of viral infectious diseases and play an important role in the prevention and control of major infectious diseases and the construction of biosafety system in China. Finally, we also need to note whether the epidemic of D614G mutant SARS-CoV-2 is random or naturally selected, as the virus is circulating globally at present. Although there is no evidence from available epidemiological and clinical data that the mutation of S protein D614G leads to increased pathogenicity or virulence of the virus, whether the transmission of the virus is enhanced still needs to be examined by systematic global assessment. Therefore, we also need to conduct more research to understand the characteristics of this virus to help end the global outbreak as soon as possible. It is necessary to continuously monitor the genetic variation of SARS-CoV-2, focusing on the influence of key mutation sites of SARS-CoV-2 on viral transmission, clinical manifestations, severity, and course of disease.
  5 in total

1.  MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Genomic surveillance elucidates Ebola virus origin and transmission during the 2014 outbreak.

Authors:  Stephen K Gire; Augustine Goba; Kristian G Andersen; Rachel S G Sealfon; Daniel J Park; Lansana Kanneh; Simbirie Jalloh; Mambu Momoh; Mohamed Fullah; Gytis Dudas; Shirlee Wohl; Lina M Moses; Nathan L Yozwiak; Sarah Winnicki; Christian B Matranga; Christine M Malboeuf; James Qu; Adrianne D Gladden; Stephen F Schaffner; Xiao Yang; Pan-Pan Jiang; Mahan Nekoui; Andres Colubri; Moinya Ruth Coomber; Mbalu Fonnie; Alex Moigboi; Michael Gbakie; Fatima K Kamara; Veronica Tucker; Edwin Konuwa; Sidiki Saffa; Josephine Sellu; Abdul Azziz Jalloh; Alice Kovoma; James Koninga; Ibrahim Mustapha; Kandeh Kargbo; Momoh Foday; Mohamed Yillah; Franklyn Kanneh; Willie Robert; James L B Massally; Sinéad B Chapman; James Bochicchio; Cheryl Murphy; Chad Nusbaum; Sarah Young; Bruce W Birren; Donald S Grant; John S Scheiffelin; Eric S Lander; Christian Happi; Sahr M Gevao; Andreas Gnirke; Andrew Rambaut; Robert F Garry; S Humarr Khan; Pardis C Sabeti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Could the D614G substitution in the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein be associated with higher COVID-19 mortality?

Authors:  Muthukrishnan Eaaswarkhanth; Ashraf Al Madhoun; Fahd Al-Mulla
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Genomic Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Guangdong Province, China.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Louis du Plessis; Zhe Liu; Verity Hill; Min Kang; Huifang Lin; Jiufeng Sun; Sarah François; Moritz U G Kraemer; Nuno R Faria; John T McCrone; Jinju Peng; Qianling Xiong; Runyu Yuan; Lilian Zeng; Pingping Zhou; Chumin Liang; Lina Yi; Jun Liu; Jianpeng Xiao; Jianxiong Hu; Tao Liu; Wenjun Ma; Wei Li; Juan Su; Huanying Zheng; Bo Peng; Shisong Fang; Wenzhe Su; Kuibiao Li; Ruilin Sun; Ru Bai; Xi Tang; Minfeng Liang; Josh Quick; Tie Song; Andrew Rambaut; Nick Loman; Jayna Raghwani; Oliver G Pybus; Changwen Ke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Tracking Changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Evidence that D614G Increases Infectivity of the COVID-19 Virus.

Authors:  Bette Korber; Will M Fischer; Sandrasegaram Gnanakaran; Hyejin Yoon; James Theiler; Werner Abfalterer; Nick Hengartner; Elena E Giorgi; Tanmoy Bhattacharya; Brian Foley; Kathryn M Hastie; Matthew D Parker; David G Partridge; Cariad M Evans; Timothy M Freeman; Thushan I de Silva; Charlene McDanal; Lautaro G Perez; Haili Tang; Alex Moon-Walker; Sean P Whelan; Celia C LaBranche; Erica O Saphire; David C Montefiori
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 66.850

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  The Analysis of Patterns of Two COVID-19 Outbreak Clusters in China.

Authors:  Wenning Li; Jianhua Gong; Jieping Zhou; Hongkui Fan; Cheng Qin; Yujiang Gong; Weidong Hu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Correlation Analysis between Urban Elements and COVID-19 Transmission Using Social Media Data.

Authors:  Ru Wang; Lingbo Liu; Hao Wu; Zhenghong Peng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Convincing the confidence to conquer COVID-19: From epidemiological intervention to laboratory investigation.

Authors:  William J Liu
Journal:  Biosaf Health       Date:  2020-11-27

4.  Excretion of SARS-CoV-2 through faecal specimens.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Cao Chen; Yang Song; Shuangli Zhu; Dongyan Wang; Hui Zhang; Guangyue Han; Yuwei Weng; Jun Xu; Jianan Xu; Pengbo Yu; Weijia Jiang; Xianda Yang; Zhongkai Lang; Dongmei Yan; Yanhai Wang; Jingdong Song; George Fu Gao; Guizhen Wu; Wenbo Xu
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.163

5.  Case Report: Genomic Characteristics of the First Known Case of SARS-CoV-2 Imported From Spain to Sichuan, China.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Bin Tang; Can Gao; Jianjun Deng; Min Shen; Chaolin Li; Zekun Fu; Zhan Gao; Qi Jiang; Hao Shi; Miao He; Huaiwu Jiang; Xu Jia
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-30

6.  Do spatiotemporal units matter for exploring the microgeographies of epidemics?

Authors:  Sui Zhang; Minghao Wang; Zhao Yang; Baolei Zhang
Journal:  Appl Geogr       Date:  2022-04-05

7.  Mutations and Phylogenetic Analyses of SARS-CoV-2 Among Imported COVID-19 From Abroad in Nanjing, China.

Authors:  Ning Zhao; Nan Zhou; Huafeng Fan; Jie Ding; Xingyu Xu; Xiaoqing Dong; Xiaoxiao Dong; Dandan Xu; Xiaoyu Min; Yan Yu; Hongjin Gong; Lingfeng Mao; Min He
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  SARS-CoV-2 cold-chain transmission: Characteristics, risks, and strategies.

Authors:  Cao Chen; Yenan Feng; Zhixiao Chen; Ying Xia; Xiang Zhao; Ji Wang; Kai Nie; Peihua Niu; Jun Han; Wenbo Xu
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 20.693

9.  Rapid, inexpensive methods for exploring SARS CoV-2 D614G mutation.

Authors:  Sirwan M A Al-Jaf; Sherko S Niranji; Zana H Mahmood
Journal:  Meta Gene       Date:  2021-07-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.