Olivia McCubbin Stepanic1, Jesse Ward2, James E Penner-Hahn2, Aniruddha Deb2, Uwe Bergmann3, Serena DeBeer1. 1. Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Stiftstrasse 34-36, D-45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany. 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States. 3. Stanford PULSE Institute, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States.
Abstract
As the second most common transition metal in the human body, zinc is of great interest to research but has few viable routes for its direct structural study in biological systems. Herein, Zn valence-to-core X-ray emission spectroscopy (VtC XES) and Zn K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) are presented as a means to understand the local structure of zinc in biological systems through the application of these methods to a series of biologically relevant molecular model complexes. Taken together, the Zn K-edge XAS and VtC XES provide a means to establish the ligand identity, local geometry, and metal-ligand bond lengths. Experimental results are supported by correlation with density-functional-theory-based calculations. Combining these theoretical and experimental approaches will enable future applications to protein systems in a predictive manner.
As the second most common transition metal in thehuman body, zinc is of great interest to research but has few viable routes for its direct structural study in biological systems. Herein, Zn valence-to-core X-ray emission spectroscopy (VtC XES) and Zn K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) are presented as a means to understand the local structure of zinc in biological systems through the application of these methods to a series of biologically relevant molecular model complexes. Taken together, theZn K-edge XAS and VtC XES provide a means to establish the ligand identity, local geometry, and metal-ligand bond lengths. Experimental results are supported by correlation with density-functional-theory-based calculations. Combining these theoretical and experimental approaches will enable future applications to protein systems in a predictive manner.
Present
in an estimated 3000 human proteins, zinc is essential for the majority
of cellular function.[1−4] It is widely biologically available and plays a multitude of roles,
in part due to its redox stability and its flexible coordination sphere.[5] As such, biological zinc is always found in theZn2+ state. It is most often coordinated by proteins using
anywhere from four to six ligands (four being most typical), which
may include histidine, cysteine, glutamate, and aspartate.[2,6] There are several avenues of continued study of zinc-containing
proteins, in particular, and biological zinc, in general, including
investigating the role of zinc-containing antisigma factors in thiol-induced
oxidative stress.[7] Zinc has been implicated
in amyloid plaque buildups, which are known to be a significant part
of Alzheimer’s disease.[8,9] Levels of zinc in the
brain (both high and low) have been implicated in a series of neurological
disorders, including Parkinson’s Disease, traumatic brain injury,
depression, and schizophrenia.[9] The role
of zinc in many of these illnesses is unclear, and experts continue
to argue about the benefit/harm that neurological zinc has in each
of these.[10,11] How zinc is managed in biological systems
is not yet well understood, and studies following zinc homeostasis
and dynamics in cells are ongoing.[12−14] Additionally, protein
design based on Zn2+ binding sites is used to introduce
or alter catalytic activity.[3,4]Zn2+ is not easily studied, since it is a diamagnetic ion with a filled
3d shell. This means that techniques often used to study other transition
metals, such as ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, magnetic
circular dichroism (MCD), or electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR),
generally fall short.[15] Metal substitution
with cobalt or cadmium was common in previous studies, but there is
no guarantee that these complexes will be isostructural.[1,16−18]67Zn nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
has also been used with some success, but the technique is hindered
by the low natural abundance and small magnetic moment of 67Zn, as well as a large quadrupole moment.[19] In isotropic solution, rapid relaxation further broadens spectra,
making solution 67ZnNMR impractical, limiting its application
in protein studies. The most common X-ray technique, X-ray crystallography,
suffers from requiring protein crystallization to create the long-range
order and from relatively modest accuracy (∼0.1 Å or worse),
that is often insufficient to distinguish, e.g., water from hydroxide
ligands. Additionally, X-ray crystallography is unable to distinguish
between similar scatterers, such as C, N, and O, and has limited spatial
resolution. Therefore, applications of crystallography are not well
suited for following chemical reactions or other kinetic changes that
require structural flexibility.X-ray absorption and emission
spectroscopies (XAS and XES, respectively) provide element-specific
structural and electronic insight into the local structure and are
applicable to both solid and solution samples.[20−24] K-edge XAS, both in the edge region and the extended
X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) region, is well established
as a means to obtain detailed local geometric and electronic structure
information. K-edge XAS occurs when the absorption of a photon leads
to a removal of an electron from the 1s orbital. The rise in absorption
cross section at theZn K-edge is due to promoting a 1s electron into
an unoccupied 4p level via a dipole allowed transition. Pre-edge features
are due to a 1s to 3d transition and, as the 3d orbitals are filled
in Zn2+, are not observed in Zn K-edge XAS spectra.[15]In some cases, XAS can also be used for
ligand identification.[25−28] Unfortunately, the spectral changes vary rather slowly with atomic
number, and like XRD, this technique suffers from being unable to
distinguish similar scatterers. Even the presence and number of nitrogen
and sulfur ligands can appear ambiguous in XAS spectra.[29] This is due to the characteristic phase shifts
of nitrogen and sulfur, which are approximately π apart. This
phase relation results in destructive interference in the EXAFS and
results in the absence of resolvable peaks in the Fourier Transform.
Despite these limitations, XAS in conjunction with density functional
theory (DFT) calculations has the potential to assign ligand identity
and protonation state (albeit somewhat indirectly) and is an extremely
good indicator of local geometry.[30−33]Valence-to-core X-ray emission
spectroscopy (VtC XES) occurs when an electron from a valence orbital
refills the 1s core hole created by absorption of a photon above the
K-edge. The VtC XES spectral features have been shown to arise largely
from ligand np and ns molecular
orbitals. Hence, both the energies and the intensities of the VtC
spectral features depend strongly on ligand identity and, as such,
are incredibly useful for determining the identity of coordinated
ligands.[23,34−38] To date, very little research on VtC XES of zinc
compounds has been reported,[39] although
VtC XES of other metals has led to a wide range of discoveries, including
the identification of the interstitialcarbon in the active site of
molybdenum[40] and vanadium[41] nitrogenases, detection of bridging oxygen ligands and
assessment of protonation states in an oxygen evolving complex and
in related structural models,[42,43] and as a means to assess
O–O and N–N bond activation.[44,45]Herein, both Zn K-edge XAS and VtC XES of a series of biologically
relevant zinc complexes were examined to assess the viability of these
spectroscopies to study oxygen-, nitrogen-, and sulfur-bound zinc
in biological systems. Ligands were chosen for their similarity to
relevant amino acids: benzoate (BzO) to mimic aspartate/glutamate,
1-methylimidazole (MeIm) and 2-aminopyridine (pyNH2) for histidine, and thiourea (SC(NH2)2) and thiophenol (SPh) for cysteine. In addition, two complexes,
[Zn(MeIm)6]2+ and [Zn(MeIm)4]2+, were selected for gaining comparative
insight into how local geometry and coordination number affect both
absorption and emission spectra (Figure ). To obtain a deeper understanding of the
observed trends in the experimental spectra, we performed density
functional theory (DFT) based spectral calculations. The complementarity
of the two spectroscopic approaches for maximizing our understanding
of the geometric and electronic structure of zinc complexes is emphasized.
The approaches established here will allow for future application
to zinc-proteins.
Figure 1
[Zn(MeIm)4]2+ top left,
[Zn(MeIm)6]2+ top right, [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] center left, and [Zn(BzO)2(pyNH2)2] center right, [Zn(SPh)4]2– bottom left, and [Zn(BzO)2(SC(NH2)2)2] bottom right.
[Zn(MeIm)4]2+ top left,
[Zn(MeIm)6]2+ top right, [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] center left, and [Zn(BzO)2(pyNH2)2] center right, [Zn(SPh)4]2– bottom left, and [Zn(BzO)2(SC(NH2)2)2] bottom right.
Experimental
Section
Sample Preparation
Bis(2-aminopyridine-N)bis(benzoate-O)zinc
([Zn(BzO)2(pyNH2)2]),[46] tetrakis(1-methylimidazole-N3)zinc(II)
diperchlorate ([Zn(MeIm)4]2+),[47] bis(benzoate-O)bis(thiourea-S)zinc(II) ([Zn(BzO)2(SC(NH2)2)2]),[48] tetraethylammonium tetrathiolphenolatozinc(II)
([Zn(SPh)4]2–),[49] and bis(1-methylimidazole-N)bis(thiophenol-S)zinc(II) ([Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2])[50] were all synthesized according to literature procedures. Hexakis(1-methylimidazole-N3)zinc(II) diperchlorate ([Zn(MeIm)6]2+) was synthesized according to a procedure for the analogous
cobalt complex.[51] For XAS experiments,
samples were diluted 10-fold with boron nitride, then packed into
aluminum spacers, and sealed with 38 μm Kapton tape. For XES
experiments, undiluted powder samples of all complexes were packed
into aluminum spacers and sealed with 38 μm Kapton tape.
XAS Data Collection
XAS spectra were collected at SSRL
beamline 9-3, with SPEAR operating at 3 GeV electron energy and 100
mA current. A Si(220) monochromator was used to scan from 9430 to
10325 eV, and a Rh-coated mirror with an energy cutoff of 10.4 keV
was used for harmonic rejection. The incident energy was calibrated
using a Zn foil between the second and third ion chambers, with a
first inflection point defined as 9659 eV. XAS was measured in transmission
mode using nitrogen filled ion chambers. The data are the averaged
result of 2–3 individual scans. The pre-edge region (9430 eV–9630
eV) was scanned in 10 eV steps, the edge region (9630 eV–9690
eV) was scanned in 0.35 eV steps, and the EXAFS region (1.62–13
Å–1) was scanned in 0.05 Å–1 steps. Samples were positioned at 90 deg with respect to the incident
beam and were maintained at a temperature of 12 K using a He-cooled
cryostat.
XES Data Collection
XES spectra were
collected at SSRL beamline 6-2 (54-Pole wiggler, 1T). The incident
beam was tuned to 10.4 keV using a Si(111) monochromator. Vertical
and horizontal focusing mirrors were used to achieve a beam size of
(∼200 μm × ∼800 μm) and a flux of 3.8
× 1012 photons/s at 100 mA ring current. The energy
of the incident beam was calibrated with Zn foil, setting the first
inflection point to 9534.92 eV.To collect the fluorescence
spectra, three spherically curved Ge(555) analyzer crystals were used
in a geometry with 1-m Rowland circles intersecting on a Si drift
detector with a 3 mm vertical slit. The analyzer resolution is estimated
to be 1.2 eV full width at half-maximum (fwhm) by Gaussian deconvolution
of the measured elastic peak widths of 1.6 eV fwhm and an estimated
Si(111) monochromator resolution of 1.1 eV fwhm. Samples were positioned
at 45 deg with respect to the incident beam and maintained at room
temperature. Radiation damage studies were performed for all samples
to establish the maximum exposure time per spot. Scans were also performed
in alternating directions (from 9616.8 to 9674.4 eV, then from 9674.4
to 9616.8 eV) to determine the extent of radiation damage. No significant
differences were observed. Examples of thesingle scans collected
in both directions are shown in Figure S1. As the sample area was not limited, fresh spots on the sample were
used for each scan, and the averaged data showed no signs of radiation
damage.
Data Processing
Fourier transforms
and normalization of XAS experimental spectra were conducted using
SamView from SixPACK.[52] XES data processing
was performed utilizing in-house Python scripts. VtC XES experimental
spectra were normalized by integrating the full spectral energy range
(including the Kβ main line) and setting the area to 1000. This
is equivalent to the edge-jump normalization in XAS, as the integrated
Kβ mainline intensity (which provides the predominant signal)
is independent of theZn chemical environment. The Kβ mainline
and VtC regions were fit separately using the Lmfit package in Python
3.[53] Thefits of the experimental VtC spectra
are shown in Figure S2.
Calculations
All calculations were performed using
the ORCA 4.2.0 electronic structure program package from Neese and
co-workers.[54] Cartesian coordinates for
all complexes were built using Avogadro[55] and then geometry optimized using a B3LYP functional[56−59] with a ZORA-def2-TZVP basis set[60] and
Sarc/J auxiliary basis set.[61] Scalar relativistic
effects were introduced using ZORA (zeroth-order regular approximation).[62] Dispersion effects were accounted for using
D3BJ.[63,64] MOAnalyzer was used as an aid in the quantitative
analysis of ORCA output files.[65] Chemdraw
was used for the visualization of molecular orbitals and for bond
length adjustments. XES and XAS calculations were performed using
previously established protocols, with a simple ground state DFT approach
for the former[36] and a time-dependent DFT
approach for the latter.[66,67] Example input files
for the geometry optimization and XES and XAS calculations are provided
in theSI. In all cases, electric dipole,
magnetic dipole, and quadrupole contributions were allowed for in
spectral calculations, but no significant magnetic dipole contributions
were observed. TDDFT calculated spectra (K edge XAS) were shifted
−16.5 eV to align with experimental energies. This shift was
determined by finding the average difference (standard deviation of
0.49) of the calculated and experimental whiteline. XAS calculated
spectra were broadened differentially by a factor of 0.03*(Energy)2 to account for the diffuse (experimental) and less rigorously
defined (calculated) unoccupied states that tend to broaden experimental
XAS data toward higher energies above the edge. DFT calculated spectra
(VtC XES) were shifted −14.7 eV to align with VtC experimental
energies, as determined by the average energy difference (standard
deviation 0.25) between the most intense VtC peak in experiment and
calculation. The correlation between the calculated VtC XES area and
the experimental area was found to have a scaling factor of 2.05 ±
0.15. Calculated XES spectra were broadened by 2.25 eV.
Results and Discussion
XAS of Tetradentate Zinc
Complexes
In order to determine the sensitivity of Zn K-edge
XAS to ligand identity, the spectra of five tetradentate complexes
were collected. The rise of intensity at theZn K-edge is due to an
absorption of a photon, and the resultant dipole allowed 1s to 4p
transition. In this case, where the oxidation state of zinc is 2+
and the geometry is approximately tetrahedral in all included compounds,
the energy of the edge is not expected to shift dramatically. However,
some changes can occur due to the relative electronegativity of various
ligands or the deviation from a perfectly tetrahedral symmetry. Pre-edge
features occur due to a 1s to 3d transition and are theoretically
not possible with a filled 3d orbital, as is the case for Zn2+. We note, however, pre-edges can occur in formally d10 complexes as a result of metal to ligand charge transfer, as has
been observed for Cu(I) complexes.[68,69] To our knowledge,
no pre-edge features have ever been observed in Zn K-edge XAS spectra. Figure (left) shows the
normalized experimentalZn K-edge XAS data for the five tetradentate
complexes. As expected, the majority of the spectra rise dramatically
at ∼9662 eV. [Zn(pyNH2)2(BzO)2] has an immediately visible low energy shoulder superimposed on
the rising edge, and both [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] and [Zn(pyNH2)2(SC(NH2)2)2] have a shoulder at higher intensity along the
edge at ∼9663 eV. By contrast, the complexes with only one
ligand type, [Zn(SPh)4]2– and [Zn(MeIm)4]2+, rise monotonously without
apparent shoulders. Within the set of 1-methylimidazole and thiophenol
complexes, an increase in edge intensity at 9665 eV occurs with increasing
sulfur ligation; sulfur-free [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ has a lower intensity than the doubly thiolate-ligated [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2], both of which are lower
than the fully thiolate-ligated [Zn(SPh)4]2–.
Figure 2
Experimental (left) and calculated (right) Zn K-edge XAS spectra.
Experimental (left) and calculated (right) Zn K-edge XAS spectra.To better understand the experimental data and
to assign trends to specific ligands, TDDFT calculated spectra were
calculated for all complexes. The experimental trends for edge position
are well mimicked by the calculations, as can be seen in Figure (right). The calculated
edge intensity also generally follows the experimental trends. The
largest discrepancy between calculated and experimental edge data
is an increased calculated intensity in the two thiophenol-containing
compounds relative to experiment. All three shoulders along the edge
seen in the experiment are present in calculated data. At lower energies,
intensity is predominately due to 4p transitions, while at higher
energies, discrete orbitals cannot be readily assigned, and diffuse
Rydberg orbitals dominate the high energy region.
Kβ Mainline of Tetradentate Zinc Complexes
K
XES occurs after the ionization of a 1s electron, where the core hole
is filled by another electron from a higher orbital. The strongest
emission line is Kα, where the 1s core hole is filled with a
2p electron. There are two distinct sections of Kβ XES spectra:
the Kβ mainline region, where the electron filling the core
hole originates from a metal 3p orbital, and the VtC region, where
the electron originates from the filled valence orbitals. The spectral
shape of the Kβ mainline for first row transition metals usually
consists of two peaks, a splitting that occurs because of 3p-3d exchange
coupling.[70−73] This splitting allows mainlines to provide insight into spin state
and metal–ligand covalency. However, similar to what has been
found for Cu(I) Kβ mainlines,[74] which
also have a d10 configuration, the zinc Kβ mainlines
for all six complexes studied here are superimposable, and no spectral
changes due to the differences in ligand coordination are observed.
An overlay of the Kβ mainlines is shown in theSI (Figure S3). The Kβ mainlines for all compounds presented
have an intense peak at 9572.6 eV, two shoulders to lower energies
at 9565.7 and 9569.7 eV, and one shoulder to higher energy at 9574.8
eV. For zinc, where 3p-3d exchange contribution is absent due to the
closed 3d shell configuration, the observed splitting is at least
in part attributed to 3p spin–orbit coupling. For Zn, this
is estimated to be 2.8 eV. However, the presence of four discrete
features in the zinc mainlines (Figure and SI) indicates that
there must be additional factors contributing to the observed spectral
shape. Previously unassigned transitions arising for copper[75] and other 3d transition metals[76] were determined to be spectator transitions. It is likely
that this is also true for zinc. However, due to this insensitivity
of the Kβ mainline to changes in ligation, a further investigation
of this spectral region has not been pursued.
Figure 3
Experimental Kβ
XES spectra of [Zn(BzO)2(pyNH2)2]
fit with four distinct peaks.
Experimental Kβ
XES spectra of [Zn(BzO)2(pyNH2)2]
fit with four distinct peaks.
VtC of Tetradentate Zinc Complexes
The
experimental VtC spectra for the five tetradentate complexes can be
seen in Figure , left.
VtC spectra arise from electrons in valence orbitals transitioning
to refill theZn 1s core hole, and since these valence molecular orbitals
have a mixture of metal and ligand character, VtC is particularly
sensitive to ligand identity.[20,23] In general, two sets
of peaks are found that correlate to ligand s and p contributions
at lower and higher energies, respectively. Lower energy peaks in
the “Kβ″ region” correspond to orbitals
dominated by ligand s character and would likely be found around 9635–9645
eV. They are largely absent in our spectra. All spectra exhibit rich
features in the “Kβ2,5 region”, the
region related to molecular orbitals with high ligand p character
that is here found between 9647 and 9662 eV. For all samples, there
is a peak at 9652 eV, the energy of which appears largely unaffected
by changes in ligation.
Figure 4
Experimental (left) and calculated (right) VtC
XES spectra of tetradentate zinc(II) complexes.
Experimental (left) and calculated (right) VtC
XES spectra of tetradentate zinc(II) complexes.At higher energies (9655 to 9662 eV) dramatic changes occur with
variation in ligand identity. All spectra but [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] present one major peak in this region.
This peak occurs at lowest energy (9656 eV) for [Zn(MeIm)4]2+, which has four nitrogen donors. The two benzoate
complexes are somewhat higher in energy; [Zn(BzO)2(pyNH2)2] has the most intense peak at 9657 eV, and [Zn(BzO)2(SC(NH2)2)2] has its most
intense peak at 9658 eV. [Zinc(SPh)4]2– has the highest energy for this peak (9659 eV), and the mixed N/S
ligated [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] has two
distinct peaks in this region at 9656 and 9659 eV. The systematic
variation in the energy of the ligand p-related peak found between
9655 and 9660 follows the following pattern: aromatic nitrogen rings
< carboxylates < thiones/thiolates. Thehydrogen bonding or
orbital overlap of aromatic nitrogen rings/carboxylates or carboxylate/thione
pairs allows for complexes with these ligand mixtures to appear as
a single peak. In contrast, aromatic nitrogen rings and thiolates
have orbitals that are far enough apart in energy, such that compounds
ligated by a combination of these ligands should have two well separated
peaks. However, we note that the exact position of the Kβ2,5 also is dependent on the extent of covalent interactions
with zinc, which is modulated by factors like distance and secondary
coordination effects. Hence, one cannot generalize that there is a
specific energy where the Kβ2,5 peak will always
occur for a specific type of ligand.To more closely examine
the origin of these VtC peaks, we performed DFT calculations of VtC
spectra shown in Figure , right panel. The calculations show some very weak ligand s features
that we do not observe experimentally, possibly because of our limited
data quality in that spectral region. Between 9655 and 9660, the calculated
spectra produce trends very similar to those found experimentally.
The calculations show that these peaks are due to orbitals with majority
ligand p character. Dipole contributions account for the majority
(92.4%) of VtC spectral intensity throughout the valence to core region,
with the caveat of a relatively intense calculated quadrupole peak
at 9652 eV, which is largely insensitive to changes in ligation and
seen in all spectra. Based on the calculated orbital content, this
ever-present peak at 9652 eV is primarily related to Zn 3d character.
An example spectrum of calculated dipole and quadrupole contributions
to the VtC spectrum is shown in Figure . The position of the blue quadrupole feature clearly
indicates that theZn 3d levels are below the filled ligand orbitals
and is consistent with previous photoelectron spectroscopy studies.[77] This has been attributed to the high effective
nuclear charge on Zn2+ which results in an inverted ligand
field.
Figure 5
Calculated VtC XES spectrum of [Zn(BzO)2(pyNH2)2] with dipole and quadrupole contributions.
Calculated VtC XES spectrum of [Zn(BzO)2(pyNH2)2] with dipole and quadrupole contributions.Having established that VtC XES is dominated by contributions
from ligand valence orbitals, it is useful to explore both how generally
transferable these observations are and to what extent VtC XES can
be utilized for the extraction of further structural information.
An investigation into the effects of ligand–metal bond length
on the VtC spectra was performed by more closely examinining the spectra
of [Zn(MeIm)4]2+, [Zn(SPh)4]2–, and [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2]. The geometry-optimized molecular models of these complexes
vary in bond length, with a Zn–N bond length of 2.01 Å
for [Zn(MeIm)4]2+, a Zn–S
bond length of 2.39 Å for [Zn(SPh)4]2–, and a Zn–N bond length of 2.08 Å and a Zn–S
bond length of 2.31 Å for [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2]. If the VtC spectrum for [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] was simply a 50/50 sum of the other two spectra,
this would suggest insensitivity to metal–ligand bond length
and overall geometry. However, as shown in Figure (right), the spectrum for [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] differs from a 50/50 sum of the
two homogeneously ligated complexes.
Figure 6
Experimental (left) and calculated (right)
VtC spectra of [Zn(MeIm)2(thio)2]
in violet and an averaged spectrum of [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ and [Zn(thio)4]2– in
black. The dashed line represents the average calculated spectra with
adjusted bond lengths for [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ and [Zn(thio)4]2–.
Experimental (left) and calculated (right)
VtC spectra of [Zn(MeIm)2(thio)2]
in violet and an averaged spectrum of [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ and [Zn(thio)4]2– in
black. The dashed line represents the average calculated spectra with
adjusted bond lengths for [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ and [Zn(thio)4]2–.To better analyze these changes, we calculated the spectra of model
complexes with fixed bond lengths of 2.08 Å (Zn–N) for
[Zn(MeIm)4]2+ and 2.31 Å (Zn–S)
for [Zn(SPh)4]2–. The sum of the calculated
optimized [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ and [Zn(SPh)4]2–, as well as the sum of these two complexes
with adjusted bond lengths, is compared to the calculated spectrum
of [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] in Figure (right). By decreasing
theZn–S bond length and increasing theZn–N bond length,
the peaks at 9656 and 9659 eV in the 50/50 composite spectra, respectively,
decrease and increase in intensity, thus, more closely approximating
the calculated spectrum of geometry optimized [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2]. As such, bond length plays a clear role
in the intensities of the VtC XES features.The bond length
adjusted 50/50 composite spectrum and the spectrum of [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2] still differ somewhat, suggesting
that other factors such as ligand–ligand interaction may also
affect the spectrum. The geometric coordinates of [Zn(MeIm)2(SPh)2], as visualized in Figure S4a, show pi-stacking between theMeIm and
SPh groups. A series of calculations varying the angle of the SPh
groups to vary the separation from theMeIm ligands were
performed. This resulted in a dramatic decrease of intensity at 9656
and an increase in intensity at 9659 eV, along with a slight shift
toward higher energy (see Figure S4b).
Since the experimental and calculated spectra match so well, it is
suggested that VtC is sensitive not only to ligand identity and metal–ligand
bond length but also to the subtle geometric structural changes that
occur between a homogeneously ligated complex and a complex with mixed
ligation.
Undefined Peaks above K-Edge in Tetradentate
Zinc Complexes
Also of interest are the weak features at
∼9665 eV and higher, which are observed in the experimental
VtC XES spectra but are absent in the calculations. The high energy
features indicate that they do not correspond to a simple valence
to core de-excitation. Emission spectra, in general, are the result
of an electron from some filled higher orbital filling some hole (here,
the 1s). Since these peaks are above the absorption K-edge energy,
the transition from which these peaks result must be from an initial
higher energy state than the valence orbitals in the ground state.
There are two ways to accomplish this: a double excitation or temporary
filling of an assumed empty orbital during the initial excitation
process.In a previous zinc VtC XES study, these features were
briefly mentioned but empirically subtracted in order to better compare
experimental VtC and DFT-based calculations, which do not account
for multielectron excitations, among other things.[39] However, the change in both intensity and position of these
high energy peaks with ligand identity is, to our knowledge, a novel
observation. In fact, these peaks appear to approximately mimic the
trends of the Kβ2,5 features seen 10 eV lower, suggesting
that they too are influenced by some valence related transition.A 2017 paper by Valenza et. al discussed double ionization satellites
in nickelmetal that appear incredibly similar in both positioning
and relative intensity to what can be seen in this zinc data.[78] The more commonly known isothermal double ionization
requires that the incident photon be well above theKL3 double-excitation threshold (10.6 keV for Zn): with an incident
energy of 10.4 keV, it is unreasonable to attribute these peaks to
isothermal double ionization. Another, less commonly discussed and
harder to model double ionization process is the adiabatic ionization
process, which occurs at lower energy than the double-excitation threshold.
The process for accounting for these double excitations in calculations,
while technically possible, is rather arduous and beyond the scope
of this current work. Another possible explanation relates to the
lowest unoccupied zinc p shell above the filled zinc d shell, which
is predicted at approximately 9665 eV. It is possible that, while
in the excited state, these p orbitals are also temporarily occupied
and that transition of an electron from this orbital to refill the
1s core hole could account for these peaks. The experimental observation
of these peaks make an important statement: although current DFT methods,
both simple and complex, often work wonderfully for modeling the trends
in VtC XES data, they can miss the spectroscopic effects of more electronically
complex scenarios. Understanding why these peaks occur in some metal
complexes but not in others could lead to further insight into transition
metal electronic structure and bonding, as they could be the result
mixing of the filled 3p/3d zinc orbitals with higher energy empty
orbitals, such as zinc 4s or 4p. However, a clear understanding of
these features is hindered by their energetic overlap with the rise
of the absorption edge, which changes the escape probability of emitted
photons and thus affects spectral shape. Further insight into the
origin of these peaks might be obtained through resonant XES experiments.
Comparison of Geometry in Zinc 1-Methylimidazole
Complexes
For a fair comparison of K-edge XAS and VtC XES
spectroscopies and to continue to illustrate ways in which they collaborate
to form a full picture of local geometry, electronic structure, and
ligand identity, a second zinc methyl imidazole complex [Zn(MeIm)6]2+ was also characterized for comparison
to the[Zn(MeIm)4]2+ complex, already
presented above. The XES and XAS experimental spectra of these two
complexes are shown in Figure (left). TheZn K-edges change dramatically between the two
complexes, both in edge energy and in intensity.
Figure 7
Experimental (left) and
calculated (right) Zn VtC XES and K-edge spectra of [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ in red and [Zn(MeIm)6]2+ in black.
Experimental (left) and
calculated (right) Zn VtC XES and K-edge spectra of [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ in red and [Zn(MeIm)6]2+ in black.Following simple electrostatic considerations, the shift of the edge
to higher energy on going from [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ at 9662 eV to [Zn(MeIm)6]2+ at 9664 eV is likely due to the destabilization of metal 4p orbitals
upon increasing coordination number. This effect is mirrored in the
VtC XES spectra, which clearly show that in the 6-coordinate complex
the filled orbitals are stabilized to deeper binding energy than those
of the 4-coordinate complex. Within the VtC XES spectra, one also
observes modulations in the intensities, with the 4-coordinate complex
exhibiting higher VtC XES intensities than the 6-coordinate complex.
This observation suggests that the shorter Zn–N(MeIm) bond lengths in the 4-coordinate complex (2.01 Å for [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ and 2.20 Å for [Zn(MeIm)6]2+) make a more significant contribution
to the observed intensity than the increased coordination number.
The calculated spectra (Figure , right) clearly reproduce the general trends observed in
the experimental data for both the VtC XES and Zn K-edges.Given
the good agreement between the experimental and calculated spectra,
we can now use the calculations to obtain further insight into the
contributions of localsite symmetry (O vs T) and metal–ligand bond length. As noted above, the XES and
XAS spectra in Figure were calculated first using their optimized geometry, which had
metal–ligand bond lengths of 2.01 Å for [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ and 2.20 Å for [Zn(MeIm)6]2+. To separate the effect of geometry
from the effect of bond length, a separate calculation was run with
a constant bond length of 2.10 Å for both complexes. The calculated
VtC XES and K-edge XAS spectra of these four models are shown in Figure . As the 6-coordinate
models maintain thesignificantly higher edge intensity compared to
their 4-coordinate counterparts, the dramatic difference in white
line intensity can be considered an effect of coordination number/site
symmetry. Similarly, regardless of bond length, the 6-coordinate complexes
show edges that are higher in energy (pointing to greater destabilization
of the empty orbitals) and VtC XES spectra that are lower in energy
(pointing to greater stabilization of the filled orbitals). In both
cases, the highest VtC XES intensity is observed for the shortest
[Zn(MeIm)]2+ bond
lengths. Taken together, these data show that the VtC XES and Zn K-edge
XAS can provide a comprehensive picture of theZn localsite symmetry
and coordination number, while also providing insight into metal–ligand
bond lengths.
Figure 8
Calculated Zn VtC XES and K-edge spectra of [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ red (optimized) and orange (adjusted
bond length of 2.1 Å). Calculated spectra of [Zn(MeIm)6]2+ are shown in black (optimized) and
blue (adjusted bond length of 2.1 Å).
Calculated Zn VtC XES and K-edge spectra of [Zn(MeIm)4]2+ red (optimized) and orange (adjusted
bond length of 2.1 Å). Calculated spectra of [Zn(MeIm)6]2+ are shown in black (optimized) and
blue (adjusted bond length of 2.1 Å).
Conclusion
This work illustrates the great
potential and complementary nature of Zn K-edge XAS and VtC XES for
the structural characterization of zinc complexes. Both Zn K-edge
XAS and VtC XES are sensitive to the local electronic structure. While
the former shows a more pronounced sensitivity to localsite symmetry
(which manifests in the increased white line intensity for 6- vs 4-coordiante
complexes), the latter is more sensitive to ligand identity. The sensitivity
of VtC XES to ligand identity and also metal–ligand distance
could serve as an important complement to EXAFS studies. Previous
EXAFS studies have shown that it is often difficult to separate N
and S contributions in zinc complexes with mixed ligation due to the
unfavorable phase relation between Zn–N and Zn–S EXAFS
contributions. In practice, this means that EXAFS is often unable
to differentiate ZnS4 from ZnS3Nsites.[29] Herein, the demonstrated sensitivity of VtC
XES spectra with regard to mixed S/N ligation could be used to complement
EXAFS data and gain a more holistic structural view of studied zinc
sites. VtC sensitivity to metal–ligand bond length and ligand
interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, allows the technique to potentially
provide complementary structural information for both EXAFS and crystallographic
analyses, which would be particularly useful in protein studies where
a high-resolution picture of the local changes at zinc sites may be
important. These spectroscopies in combination with calculations provide
a powerful way to characterize biological zinc, a very important and
notoriously difficult-to-probe metal.
Authors: Richard C Walroth; James T Lukens; Samantha N MacMillan; Kenneth D Finkelstein; Kyle M Lancaster Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Fangting Yu; Virginia M Cangelosi; Melissa L Zastrow; Matteo Tegoni; Jefferson S Plegaria; Alison G Tebo; Catherine S Mocny; Leela Ruckthong; Hira Qayyum; Vincent L Pecoraro Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: George E Cutsail; Nicole L Gagnon; Andrew D Spaeth; William B Tolman; Serena DeBeer Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Marcus D Hanwell; Donald E Curtis; David C Lonie; Tim Vandermeersch; Eva Zurek; Geoffrey R Hutchison Journal: J Cheminform Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 5.514
Authors: Blaise L Geoghegan; Yang Liu; Sergey Peredkov; Sebastian Dechert; Franc Meyer; Serena DeBeer; George E Cutsail Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 15.419