Literature DB >> 32893139

Prediction of Postoperative Outcomes Following Hip Fracture Surgery: Independent Validation and Recalibration of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score.

William J Doherty1, Thomas A Stubbs1, Andrew Chaplin2, Mike R Reed2, Avan A Sayer3, Miles D Witham4, Antony K Sorial5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Independent validation of risk scores after hip fracture is uncommon, particularly for evaluation of outcomes other than death. We aimed to assess the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) for prediction of mortality, physical function, length of stay, and postoperative complications.
DESIGN: Analysis of routinely collected prospective data partly collected by follow-up interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive hip fracture patients were identified from the Northumbria hip fracture database between 2014 and 2018. Patients were excluded if they were not surgically managed or if scores for predictive variables were missing.
METHODS: C statistics were calculated to test the discriminant ability of the NHFS, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade for in-hospital, 30-day, and 120-day mortality; functional independence at discharge, 30 days, and 120 days; length of stay; and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 3208 individuals, mean age 82.6 (standard deviation 8.6). 2192 (70.9%) were female. 194 (6.3%) died during the first 30 days, 1686 (54.5%) were discharged to their own home, 211 (6.8%) had no mobility at 120 days, 141 (4.6%) experienced a postoperative complication. The median length of stay was 18 days (interquartile range 8-28). For mortality, C statistics for the NHFS ranged from 0.68 to 0.69, similar to ASA and AMTS. For postoperative mobility, the C statistics for the NHFS ranged from 0.74 to 0.83, similar to AMTS (0.61-0.82) and better than the ASA grade (0.68-0.71). Length of stay was significantly correlated with each score (P < .001 by Jonckheere-Terpstra test); NHFS and AMTS showed inverted U-shaped relationships with length of stay. For postoperative complications, C statistics for NHFS (0.54-0.59) were similar to ASA grade (0.53-0.61) and AMTS (0.50-0.58). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The NHFS performed consistently well in predicting functional outcomes, moderately in predicting mortality, but less well in predicting length of stay and complications. There remains room for improvement by adding further predictors such as measures of physical performance in future analyses.
Copyright © 2020 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip fracture; calibration; case mix; discrimination; risk score; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32893139     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  7 in total

1.  Performance of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score and Clinical Frailty Scale as predictors of short and long-term outcomes: a dual-centre 3-year observational study of hip fracture patients.

Authors:  George Thorne; Luke Hodgson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Cumulated ambulation score as predictor of postoperative mobility in patients with proximal femur fractures.

Authors:  Norio Yamamoto; Yosuke Tomita; Arisa Ichinose; Shintaro Sukegawa; Shigeki Yokoyama; Tomoyuki Noda; Keisuke Kawasaki; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Validation of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) in Patients with Hip Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Veronique A J I M van Rijckevorsel; Gert R Roukema; Taco M A L Klem; Tjallingius M Kuijper; Louis de Jong
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Mortality Prediction in Hip Fracture Patients: Physician Assessment Versus Prognostic Models.

Authors:  Julian Karres; Ruben Zwiers; Jan-Peter Eerenberg; Bart C Vrouenraets; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.884

5.  Systemic immune-inflammation index independently predicts poor survival of older adults with hip fracture: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhi-Cong Wang; Wei Jiang; Xi Chen; Ling Yang; Hong Wang; Yue-Hong Liu
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  The ASA score predicts infections, cardiovascular complications, and hospital readmissions after hip fracture - A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  A C Meyer; H Eklund; M Hedström; K Modig
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Implementing grip strength assessment in hip fracture patients: a feasibility project.

Authors:  William J Doherty; Thomas A Stubbs; Andrew Chaplin; Sarah Langford; Nicola Sinclair; Kinda Ibrahim; Mike R Reed; Avan A Sayer; Miles D Witham; Antony K Sorial
Journal:  J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls       Date:  2021-06-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.