Literature DB >> 32893048

Nursing workload in the COVID-19 era.

Alberto Lucchini1, Pasquale Iozzo2, Stefano Bambi3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32893048      PMCID: PMC7418697          DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0964-3397            Impact factor:   3.072


× No keyword cloud information.
Since the early 1970, tools and procedures for measuring nursing workload in the intensive care unit (ICU), were tested and improved according to clinical, technological and organisational developments and also the evolution of the nursing role (Greaves et al., 2018). The idea behind the implementation of nursing workload measurement tools was to deliver an evidence-based decision-making process, guaranteeing transparency of policy and achieving a higher level of efficiency. However, the concept of “nursing workload” is still complex and difficult to define. Currently, the main validated tools for nursing workload monitoring are: 1) Simplified therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS 28) (Miranda et al., 1996), 2) Nine equivalents of man power score (NEMS) (Miranda et al., 1997) and 3) Nursing Activities Score (NAS) (Miranda et al., 2003). The staff skill mix should be adjusted on the basis of the resulting scores. The patient’s clinical complexity could be, in selected cases, a good proxy for measuring nursing complexity. An example of this correlation is represented by patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) guidelines suggest that these patients should be centralised in referral centres where, an adequate nurse-to-patient ratio could be guaranteed in addition to the technical equipment. The use of NAS in an Italian ECMO centre, demonstrated that the nurse to patient in ECMO ratio was between 1:1.5 and 1:1 (Lucchini et al., 2019) Padilha et al. (2008) investigated the associations between NAS and patients’ variables such as gender, age, length of stay, ICU discharge, ICU management, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and TISS-28. This study shows that the highest NAS scores were associated with increased mortality, length of stay, severity of the patient illness (SAPS II) and particularly to TISS-28 in the ICU. Recently Stafseth et al. (2018), showed that NAS highlights nurses' workload and may be a helpful classification system to be used in planning and budgeting of intensive care resources. A statistically significant association was found between monthly costs, NAS and NEMS; therefore, the cost of care should be reckoned on the individual patients' nursing care needs. However, the greatest challenge related to nursing workload is represented by the levels of nursing complexity management in ICU patients. Rengeiné et al. (2020), have used the “King's-TISS” score to evaluate the nursing workload and the ideal nurse-to-patient ratio, in the first 48 h perioperative period after blood product free liver transplantations. The authors found that the absence of blood product administration in liver transplantations decreased the total and organ specific workload, with the exception of metabolic, haemostasis, immunology conditions and for basic support requirement. The basic nursing care items remained unchanged in the 48 h after blood product free liver transplantations (Rengeiné et al., 2020). In recent decades, medical and nursing care has changed and focused mainly to the diagnosis and treatment of acute illnesses. However, basic nursing care remains an essential and underestimated factor for patient recovery if compared to intensive care treatments. Rengeiné et al. (2020) revealed that the basic nursing care items remained unchanged, until 48 h after liver transplantations. Instead, basic nursing care, the presence of invasive devices, monitoring, ventilatory and cardiovascular nursing activities decreased significantly at the end of the second postoperative day. The NAS, NEMS and TISS-28 tools are mainly based on activities performed by nurses in the ICU, while a patient-centred care approach consistent with the values, needs and desires of patients/families and caregivers has been well established within the fundamentals of ICU nursing care (Palese et al., 2016). The ICU nursing care process has also been affected by: increased availability of evidence-based nursing knowledge; patient care innovations (e.g. decreasing sedation, delirium monitoring, early mobilisation and respiratory/cardiac extracorporeal support); open ICU policies/guidelines and the use of new communication technologies, such as video-calling with patient’s relatives (Negro et al., 2020). Moreover, in this (unexpected) COVID-19 era, new factors can tremendously influence nursing workload. COVID-19 patients require prophylactic measures to prevent or contain the spread of the virus to other patients: donning protective garments, specific decontamination procedures, isolated dedicated areas where specific supplies are stored. All these measures increase nursing workload (Giuliani et al., 2018), not only for the time required of their implementation but also for their organisation and management. Critical care nurses are experiencing a new challenging working scenario inside the COVID-19 ICUs. In these setting, they are called to provide the usual high standard care of patients with the additional problems caused by the personal protective equipment, especially for long periods. COVID-19 ICU patients cannot receive external visitors, they are dependent on support from healthcare workers. The sudden lack of ICU beds and mechanical ventilators has led to an increasing number of conversions of recovery and operating rooms into new COVID-19 areas. (Bambi et al., 2020, Lucchini et al., 2020). New ICU beds were designated and critical care nurses were needed to manage patients who were dependant on high tech organ and system support (including extracoporeal membrane oxygenation) (Bambi et al., 2020, Lucchini et al., 2020). Some preliminary reports identify the nursing workload is dramatically high in COVID-19 patients (Lucchini et al., 2020, Reper et al., 2020). In addition to the severity of illness, the nursing workload increased because of the need to provide humanistic care in the absence of family. The introduction of mobile phone calls (Negro et al., 2020) also helped patients to mitigate their sense of isolation and keep them and their relatives updated, about what is happening outside and inside “the hospital walls”. When people affected by COVID-19 enter the hospital, they literally disappear from their relatives' lives. Therefore, the COVID-19 era is driving the need to enhance nursing workload scores with new issues, including the time for donning and doffing personal protective equipment (PPE), the additional time taken to provide care wearing PPE, the need for distanced communication between patient and relatives, and the need to manage the increasing incidence and severity of agitation and delirium due to the isolated environment (Kotfis et al., 2020).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
  16 in total

1.  Introduction to the Special Issue: "Nursing Education and Research in the Remote Era".

Authors:  Jiyeon Kang
Journal:  Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.085

2.  Willingness to participate in front-line work during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of nurses from a province in South-West China.

Authors:  Yunting Luo; Xianqiong Feng; Mingyue Zheng; Dan Zhang; Hong Xiao; Ning Li
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.680

3.  The lived experiences of frontline nurses during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Qatar: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ralph C Villar; Abdulqadir J Nashwan; Rejo G Mathew; Ahmed S Mohamed; Sathish Munirathinam; Ahmad A Abujaber; Mahmood M Al-Jabry; Mujahed Shraim
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-05-05

4.  The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the mental health of healthcare workers in a hospital setting-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaspinder Sanghera; Nikhil Pattani; Yousuf Hashmi; Kate F Varley; Manikandar Srinivas Cheruvu; Alex Bradley; Joshua R Burke
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Being a Nurse at the Ground Zero of Care in Turkey During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Birgül Cerit; Lütfiye Nur Uzun
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-01-12

6.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Future Nursing Career Turnover Intention Among Nursing Students.

Authors:  Yulan Lin; Zhijian Hu; Mahmoud Danaee; Haridah Alias; Li Ping Wong
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-08-27

7.  Increased Incidence of Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Multicentric Cohort Study.

Authors:  Charles-Hervé Vacheron; Alain Lepape; Anne Savey; Anaïs Machut; Jean Francois Timsit; Philippe Vanhems; Quoc Viet Le; Julia Egbeola; Maelle Martin; Virginie Maxime; Paul-Simon Pugliesi; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Arnaud Friggeri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 9.296

8.  PTSD Symptoms and Functional Impairment among Nurses Treating COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Brian J Ayotte; Anna E Schierberl Scherr; Marni B Kellogg
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2022-02-18

9.  Targeted Minimal Staff-to-Patient Ratios Are Unachievable - A Nationwide Survey in German ICUs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Clemens Grimm; Steffen Dickel; Alexandra Sachkova; Maria Popp; Martin Golinksi; Falk Fichtner; Peter Kranke; Christian Seeber; Sven Laudi; Sebastian Voigt-Radloff; Onnen Moerer
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-19

10.  Helmet CPAP to treat hypoxic pneumonia outside the ICU: an observational study during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Giacomo Bellani; Giuseppe Foti; Andrea Coppadoro; Annalisa Benini; Robert Fruscio; Luisa Verga; Paolo Mazzola; Giuseppe Bellelli; Marco Carbone; Giacomo Mulinacci; Alessandro Soria; Beatrice Noè; Eduardo Beck; Riccardo Di Sciacca; Davide Ippolito; Giuseppe Citerio; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Andrea Biondi; Alberto Pesci; Paolo Bonfanti; Davide Gaudesi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.