| Literature DB >> 32892290 |
Suvi T Häkkinen1, Heli Nygren2, Liisa Nohynek2, Riitta Puupponen-Pimiä2, Raija-Liisa Heiniö2, Natalia Maiorova2, Heiko Rischer2, Anneli Ritala2.
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE: Sustainability and safety aspects of plant cell cultures as food are presented. Applicability of dairy side streams as carbon source and use of natural growth enhancers in cultivation are shown. Biotechnologically produced cellular products are currently emerging to replace and add into the portfolio of agriculturally derived commodities. Plant cell cultures used for food could supplement current food production. However, still many aspects need to be resolved before this new food concept can enter the market. Issues related to sustainability and safety for human consumption are relevant for both consumers and regulators. In this study, two plant cell cultures, deriving from arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus) and birch (Betula pendula), were cultivated using lactose-rich dairy side streams as alternative carbon sources to replace sucrose. Biomasses were comparable to those of original plant cell culture media when up to 83% and 75% of the original sucrose was replaced by these side streams for arctic bramble and birch cell cultures, respectively. Furthermore, nutritional composition or sensory properties were not compromised. Synthetic plant growth regulators were replaced by natural components, such as coconut water and IAA for several subculture cycles. Finally, it was shown that only trace amounts of free growth regulators are present in the cells at the harvesting point and assessment by freshwater crustaceans assay indicated that toxicity of the cells was not exceeding that of traditionally consumed bilberry fruit.Entities:
Keywords: Cellular agriculture; Dairy side stream; Food; Lactose; Plant cell cultures; Plant growth regulators
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32892290 PMCID: PMC7644541 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-020-02592-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Cell Rep ISSN: 0721-7714 Impact factor: 4.570
Fig. 1Biomass accumulation of arctic bramble cell culture in media containing different carbohydrate sources. Sucrose 100% represents 30 g/l. Asterisks (**) represent statistical differences compared to 100% sucrose with the level p < 0.01 (Dunnett T3)
Fig. 2Biomass accumulation of arctic bramble cell culture in media containing different lactose-containing side-streams and/or sucrose. Sucrose 100% represents 30 g/l. Letters represent statistical differences (p < 0.01). a Sucrose replacement with lactose fraction (LS-1) and UF milk permeate (LS-2) (b) UF milk permeate (LS-2) ratios in media with elevated total carbohydrate levels. c Long-term maintenance in UF milk permeate (LS-2) containing media
Fig. 3Biomass accumulation of birch cell culture in media containing different carbohydrate sources. Sucrose 100% represents 30 g/l. Letters represent statistical differences (p < 0.01). a Sucrose replacement with lactose fraction (LS-1), UF milk permeate (LS-2), acid whey (LS-3) and UF whey permeate (LS-4). b Replacement of sucrose with different ratios of acid whey (LS-3) and UF whey permeate (LS-4)
Fig. 4Sensory profiles of plant cell cultures of arctic bramble and birch (n = 10). Sucrose 100% represents 30 g/l. a Arctic bramble cell culture cultivated in media with 25% sucrose with 125% UF milk permeate (LS-2) or 100% sucrose. b Birch cell cultures cultivated in various lactose-containing side-streams or in 100% sucrose
Intracellular carbohydrate composition (mg/g DW) of cell cultures of arctic bramble and birch when cultivated in medium with various carbohydrate sources
| Arctic bramble cell culture in 25% sucrose + 125% LS-2a | Arctic bramble cell culture in 100% sucrosea | Birch cell culture in 50% sucrose + 50% LS-4b | Birch cell culture in 25% sucrose + 75% LS-3b | Birch cell culture in 50% sucrose + 50% LS-2b | Birch cell culture in 100% sucroseb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acid insoluble material [%] | 3.7 (0.1) | 3.0 (0.3) | 9.1 (0.5) | 5.5 (0.1) | 9.8 (0.1) | 14.9 (0.4) |
| Acid soluble Material [%] | 6.5 (0.3) | 3.8 (0.4) | 3.4 (0.2) | 4.9 (0.1) | 4.2 (0.1) | 4.3 (0.4) |
| Free sugars [%] (Sum of Glu, Xyl, Ara, Gal, Man, Rha, Fru, Suc) | 8.4 | 38.3 | 18.4 | 16.9 | 21.0 | 33.3 |
| Free sugar composition [mg/g] | ||||||
| Glucose | 37.4 (1.0) | 164.0 (0.6) | 92.4 (2.1) | 79.5 (0.3) | 103.0 (3.9) | 173.7 (1.8) |
| Xylose | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 |
| Arabinose | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 |
| Galactose | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | 8.2 (0.0) | < 4 | < 4 |
| Mannose | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 |
| Rhamnose | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 |
| Fructose | 25.2 (0.9) | 92.1 (2.5) | 91.6 (1.5) | 80.8 (1.1) | 107.3 (3.1) | 154.6 (1.6) |
| Sucrose | 21.5 (1.6) | 126.8 (2.1) | < 4 | < 4 | < 4 | 5.1 (0.3) |
| Total sugar composition [mg/g] | ||||||
| Glucosec | 146.3 (1.8) | 322.3 (60.6) | 171.4 (0.3) | 171.9 (3.2) | 184.2 (3.8) | 247.3 (0.8) |
| Xylose | 11.9 (0.2) | 6.9 (0.5) | 6.6 (0.2) | 8.9 (0.2) | 7.5 (0.3) | 5.6 (0.0) |
| Arabinose | 31.2 (0.0) | 22.6 (0.0) | 31.8 (1.2) | 42.6 (1.4) | 37.8 (0.1) | 33.9 (0.2) |
| Galactose | 61.5 (2.2) | 34.4 (6.2) | 39.3 (1.9) | 45.1 (0.5) | 44.4 (0.7) | 27.7 (0.2) |
| Mannose | 3.9 (0.1) | 3.7 (0.2) | 6.5 (0.1) | 5.8 (0.1) | 7.3 (0.1) | 6.9 (0.0) |
| Rhamnose | 8.6 (0.1) | 5.0 (0.6) | 6.2 (0.1) | 8.0 (0.1) | 6.8 (0.1) | 4.4 (0.0) |
| Fructosed | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
Results are expressed as mean (± SD) of two biological replicates
a45 g/l total amount of carbohydrates
b30 g/l total amount of carbohydrates
cContains also glucose from sucrose (sucrose degraded in the acid hydrolysis used in the analysis)
dFructose was not detectable by the method used
Amino acid concentrations in arctic bramble and birch cell culture samples after 8-day cultivation in control (100% sucrose) and in modified media
| Amino acid content [mg/g] dw | Arctic bramble cell culture in 25% sucrose + 125% LS-2a | Arctic bramble cell culture in 100% sucrosea | Birch cell culture in 50% sucrose + 50% LS-4b | Birch cell culture in 25% sucrose + 75% LS-3b | Birch cell culture in 50% sucrose + 50% LS-2b | Birch cell culture in 100% sucroseb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| His | 6.8 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.0 | 3.5 ± 0.1 |
| Ser | 15.3 ± 0.4 | 10.8 ± 0.4 | 9.0 ± 0.5 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 9.6 ± 0.1 | 10.8 ± 0.3 |
| Arg | 12.7 ± 0.2 | 16.0 ± 0.2 | 7.0 ± 0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 6.6 ± 0.4 |
| Gly | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 5.2 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.1 |
| Asp | 31.3 ± 0.2 | 15.8 ± 0.3 | 14.5 ± 0.3 | 13.2 ± 0.6 | 13.6 ± 0.1 | 13.2 ± 0.2 |
| Glu | 39.6 ± 0.2 | 21.2 ± 0.4 | 17.1 ± 0.4 | 15.7 ± 0.8 | 17.3 ± 0.2 | 16.1 ± 0.2 |
| Thr | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.0 | 5.6 ± 0.2 |
| Ala | 14.2 ± 0.2 | 10.7 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 6.8 ± 0.0 | 6.7 ± 0.1 |
| Pro | 9.1 ± 0.2 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.0 | 5.5 ± 0.1 |
| Cys | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| Lys | 14.3 ± 0.5 | 9.9 ± 0.3 | 9.3 ± 0.2 | 7.3 ± 0.4 | 8.5 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.1 |
| Tyr | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.0 | 3.3 ± 0.0 |
| Met | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 |
| Val | 14.9 ± 0.1 | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 7.5 ± 0.5 | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 7.6 ± 0.2 |
| Ile | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 7.1 ± 0.2 | 6.8 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 6.3 ± 0.0 | 6.2 ± 0.1 |
| Leu | 16.6 ± 0.1 | 11.4 ± 0.2 | 11.7 ± 0.3 | 10.7 ± 0.5 | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 10.8 ± 0.1 |
| Phe | 9.9 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 0.2 | 7.1 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 6.3 ± 0.1 |
| Trp | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.0 |
| SUM as % | 229.1 ± 3.0 | 154.1 ± 2.6 | 127.4 ± 3.7 | 118.1 ± 5.8 | 121.9 ± 0.6 | 120.5 ± 2.1 |
The results are expressed as mg/g dw ± SD (n = 3). The calculated sum of the amino acids is considered to present the total protein content of the sample
a45 g/l total amount of carbohydrates
b30 g/l total amount of carbohydrates
Concentrations of plant growth regulators used in the original medium and after 8-day cultivation in either light or in darkness in the intracellular space of arctic bramble and birch cell cultures (μg/g DW; ± SD; n = 3)
| Cell culture | Growth regulator | Culture medium | Intracellular (8 days) light | Intracellular (8 days) dark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/l | μg/g DW | μg/g DW | ||
| Arctic bramble | BA | 0 | ND | ND |
| IAA | 0 | ND | ND | |
| KIN | 0.1 | ND | ND | |
| NAA | 1.0 | ND | ND | |
| TDZ | 0 | ND | ND | |
| 2,4-D | 0 | ND | ND | |
| Birch | BA | 0 | ND | ND |
| IAA | 0 | ND | ND | |
| KIN | 0.5 | ND | ND | |
| NAA | 0 | ND | ND | |
| TDZ | 0 | ND | ND | |
| 2,4-D | 2.0 | 0.82 ± 0.23a | 0.33 ± 0.05b |
ND not detected, below the limit of quantitation (LOQ: 0.1 pg/l for KIN, 50.0 pg/l for NAA, 0.4 pg/l for 2,4-D, 0.1 pg/l for BA, 0.1 pg/l for IAA, 0.1 pg/l for TDZ)
aIf calculated from the intracellular concentration when taking into consideration, the biomass (DW) produced per litre, the corresponding amount was 0.016 ± 0.004 mg/l
bIf calculated from the intracellular concentration when taking into consideration the biomass (DW) produced per litre, the corresponding amount was 0.001 ± 0.000 mg/l
Acute toxicity assessment of plant cell cultures and edible plant samples with Daphnia magna
| EC50 values (mg/L) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Measured values | 24 h | 48 h |
| Arctic bramble cell extract | > 1250 | 730 |
| Birch cell extract | 820 | 760 |
| Carrot extract | > 1250 | 1000 |
| Bilberry fruit extract | 730 | 730 |
| K2Cr2O7 (negative control) | 1 | 0.6 |
| Reference values according to literature | 24 h | 48 h |
| 2,4-Da | ~ 300 | nd |
| Malathiona | ~ 0.004 | nd |
| Na-PCPa | ~ 1 | nd |
| K2Cr2O7a | ~ 1 | nd |
| Ethanolb | nd | ~ 10 |
| Streptomycinc | 947 | 487 |
| NAAd | nd | 180 |
Results presented as EC50 values after 24 h and 48 h
nd not determined
aPersoone et al. (2009) . In: Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 393, 01
bBarbosa et al. 2003. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 70
cWollenberger et al. 2000. Chemosphere 40
dhttps://ecotox.ipmcenters.org/details.cfm?recordID=8254
Fig. 5Arctic bramble cell culture cultivated with and without growth regulators and with various culture medium additives: caseine, yeast extract, coconut water, IAA. Cultivation period was 8 days. Letters represent statistical differences (p < 0.01)
Fig. 6Arctic bramble cell culture cultivation over four cultivation passages in original culture medium with NAA + KIN, medium without hormones, medium without hormones + 10% coconut water and in medium without hormones + 1 mg/l IAA. Black: 1st cultivation passage; White: 2nd cultivation passage; Grey: 4th cultivation passage. Letters represent statistical differences in each case as a function of cultivation passage (p < 0.01). a in light and (b) in darkness