| Literature DB >> 32890987 |
Tiago Carregari Polachini1, Isabel Hernando2, Antonio Mulet3, Javier Telis-Romero4, Juan A Cárcel3.
Abstract
Improving the actual acid hydrolysis of cassava bagasse (CB) with the assistance of high-intensity ultrasound (US) was aimed in comparison with mechanical agitation (AG). The kinetics of reducing and total sugar release were mathematically modeled. The acoustic field characterization and apparent viscosity of the suspensions were correlated. Moreover, microscopic analyses (visible, fluorescence and polarized light) were carried out to identify changes produced by the treatments. Both AG and US-treatments showed themselves to be effective at hydrolyzing CB. However, US-experiments reached equilibrium in the reducing sugar release process earlier and obtained slightly higher values of total sugars released. The Naik model fitted the experimental data with good accuracy. A greater loss in the birefringence of the starch granules and the degradation of lignocellulosic matter was also observed in US-assisted hydrolysis. The actual acoustic power applied was reduced after hydrolysis, probably due to the increase in the apparent viscosity of the resulting suspensions.Entities:
Keywords: Bioethanol; Birefringence; Hydrolysis kinetics; Reducing sugar; Total sugar
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32890987 PMCID: PMC7786595 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrason Sonochem ISSN: 1350-4177 Impact factor: 7.491
Fig. 1Set-up used in the experiments under conventional agitation.
Fig. 2Scheme of the set-up used in the ultrasound-assisted hydrolysis.
Fig. 3Relative release of total and reducing sugar concentration over the agitation of cassava bagasse in aqueous medium.
Fig. 4Relative production of (a) reducing and (b) total sugars during the acid hydrolysis of cassava bagasse (CB) assisted by conventional agitation (AG) or by ultrasound application (US).
Fitting parameters of the Naik model for the different treatments.
| Reducing sugars | Total sugars | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B5AG0 | B5AG10-A | B5US10-A | B5AG0 | B5AG10-A | B5US10-A | |
| 7.2051 | 0.6780 | 0.3520 | 0.4009 | 0.1556 | 0.1525 | |
| 424.2585 | 112.4069 | 22.4413 | 2.0547 | 23.2993 | 35.1955 | |
| 0.9533 | 0.9879 | 0.9819 | 0.8715 | 0.9551 | 0.9171 | |
| 0.2074 | 0.0008 | 0.0109 | 0.0498 | 0.0076 | 0.0089 | |
Apparent viscosity of the acid suspensions before and after acid hydrolysis.
| Experiment | Apparent viscosity (mPa∙s) | |
|---|---|---|
| Before Hydrolysis | After Hydrolysis | |
| B5AG10-A | 1177 ± 9c | 1341 ± 10b |
| B5US10-A | 1746 ± 3 a | |
Means and standard deviation followed by the same lowercase letters signify there are no significant differences between the measurements according to the Fisher test at the 95% confidence level.
Acoustic parameters obtained from the determinations of the acoustic fields.
| Acoustic parameters | B5US10-A experiment | |
|---|---|---|
| Before | After | |
| Acoustic power (W) | 148.202 ± 2.070 a | 77.129 ± 19.499b |
| Acoustic intensity (W∙cm−2) | 38.987 ± 0.544 a | 20.290 ± 5.130b |
| Acoustic density (W∙mL−1) | 0.988 ± 0.011 a | 0.514 ± 0.130b |
| Acoustic load (W∙g−1 of dried cassava bagasse) | 20.586 ± 0.235 a | 10.714 ± 2.709b |
Means and standard deviation followed by the same lowercase letters in the same line signify there are no significant differences between the measurements according to the Fisher test at the 95% confidence level.
Fig. 5Bright field micrographs of cassava bagasse before and after acid treatment under conventional agitation or assisted by high-intensity ultrasound (10x).
Fig. 6Bright field (left), fluorescence (middle) and polarized light (right) micrographs of starch granules from cassava bagasse before and after acid treatments under conventional agitation or by high-intensity ultrasound (20x).