BACKGROUND: Non-neutralizing antibodies inducing complement-dependent lysis (CDL) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity may contribute to protection against influenza infection. We investigated CDL and ADCC responses in healthy adults randomized to receive either non-adjuvanted or AS03-adjuvanted monovalent A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine (containing 15 µg/3.75 μg of hemagglutinin, respectively) on a 2-dose schedule 21 days apart. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory analysis of a subset of 106 subjects having no prior history of A(H1N1)pdm09 infection or seasonal influenza vaccination enrolled in a previously reported study (NCT00985673). Antibody responses against the homologous A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) vaccine strain and a related A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1) seasonal influenza strain were analyzed up to Day 42. RESULTS: Baseline seropositivity determined with hemagglutination inhibition (HI), CDL and ADCC antibody titers against viral strains was high; A/California/7/2009 (HI [40.4-48.1%]; CDL [34.6-36.0%]; ADCC [92.1-92.3%]); A/Brisbane/59/2007 (HI [73.1-88.9%]; CDL [38.0-42.0%]; ADCC [86.8-97.0%]). CDL seropositivity increased following vaccination with both adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted formulations (A/California/7/2009 [95.9-100%]; A/Brisbane/59/2007 [75.5-79.6%]). At Day 21, increases in CDL and ADCC antibody geometric mean titers against both strains were observed for both formulations. After 2 doses of AS03-adjuvanted vaccine, vaccine responses of 95.8% (≥9-fold increase from baseline in CDL titers) and 34.3% (≥16-fold increase from baseline in ADCC titers) were seen against A/California/7/2009; and 22.4% and 42.9%, respectively, against A/Brisbane/59/2007. Vaccine responses after 2 doses of the non-adjuvanted vaccine were broadly similar. CONCLUSIONS: Broadly comparable non-neutralizing immune responses were observed following vaccination with non-adjuvanted and AS03-adjuvanted A(H1N1)pdm09 formulations; including activity against a related vaccine strain.
BACKGROUND: Non-neutralizing antibodies inducing complement-dependent lysis (CDL) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity may contribute to protection against influenza infection. We investigated CDL and ADCC responses in healthy adults randomized to receive either non-adjuvanted or AS03-adjuvanted monovalent A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine (containing 15 µg/3.75 μg of hemagglutinin, respectively) on a 2-dose schedule 21 days apart. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory analysis of a subset of 106 subjects having no prior history of A(H1N1)pdm09 infection or seasonal influenza vaccination enrolled in a previously reported study (NCT00985673). Antibody responses against the homologous A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) vaccine strain and a related A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1) seasonal influenza strain were analyzed up to Day 42. RESULTS: Baseline seropositivity determined with hemagglutination inhibition (HI), CDL and ADCC antibody titers against viral strains was high; A/California/7/2009 (HI [40.4-48.1%]; CDL [34.6-36.0%]; ADCC [92.1-92.3%]); A/Brisbane/59/2007 (HI [73.1-88.9%]; CDL [38.0-42.0%]; ADCC [86.8-97.0%]). CDL seropositivity increased following vaccination with both adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted formulations (A/California/7/2009 [95.9-100%]; A/Brisbane/59/2007 [75.5-79.6%]). At Day 21, increases in CDL and ADCC antibody geometric mean titers against both strains were observed for both formulations. After 2 doses of AS03-adjuvanted vaccine, vaccine responses of 95.8% (≥9-fold increase from baseline in CDL titers) and 34.3% (≥16-fold increase from baseline in ADCC titers) were seen against A/California/7/2009; and 22.4% and 42.9%, respectively, against A/Brisbane/59/2007. Vaccine responses after 2 doses of the non-adjuvanted vaccine were broadly similar. CONCLUSIONS: Broadly comparable non-neutralizing immune responses were observed following vaccination with non-adjuvanted and AS03-adjuvanted A(H1N1)pdm09 formulations; including activity against a related vaccine strain.
Authors: Sinthujan Jegaskanda; Catherine Luke; Heather D Hickman; Mark Y Sangster; Wendy F Wieland-Alter; Jacqueline M McBride; Jon W Yewdell; Peter F Wright; John Treanor; Carrie M Rosenberger; Kanta Subbarao Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Mary Dawn T Co; Masanori Terajima; Stephen J Thomas; Richard G Jarman; Kamonthip Rungrojcharoenkit; Stefan Fernandez; In-Kyu Yoon; Darunee Buddhari; John Cruz; Francis A Ennis Journal: Viral Immunol Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 2.257
Authors: Sinthujan Jegaskanda; Mary Dawn T Co; John Cruz; Kanta Subbarao; Francis A Ennis; Masanori Terajima Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Rory D de Vries; Nella J Nieuwkoop; Mark Pronk; Erwin de Bruin; Geert Leroux-Roels; Elisabeth G W Huijskens; Rob S van Binnendijk; Florian Krammer; Marion P G Koopmans; Guus F Rimmelzwaan Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Sinthujan Jegaskanda; Emma R Job; Marit Kramski; Karen Laurie; Gamze Isitman; Robert de Rose; Wendy R Winnall; Ivan Stratov; Andrew G Brooks; Patrick C Reading; Stephen J Kent Journal: J Immunol Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Xuemin Chen; He-Ying Sun; Chun Yi Lee; Christina A Rostad; Jessica Trost; Rodrigo B Abreu; Michael A Carlock; Jason R Wilson; Shane Gansebom; Ted M Ross; David A Steinhauer; Evan J Anderson; Larry J Anderson Journal: Virology Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 3.513
Authors: Damien Friel; Mary Co; Thierry Ollinger; Bruno Salaun; Anne Schuind; Ping Li; Karl Walravens; Francis A Ennis; David W Vaughn Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses Date: 2020-09-05 Impact factor: 4.380