Jane M Lim1, Zaw Myo Tun1, Vishakha Kumar1, Sharon Esi Duoduwa Quaye1, Vittoria Offeddu1, Alex R Cook1, May Oo Lwin2, Shaohai Jiang3, Clarence C Tam1,4. 1. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore. 2. Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. 3. Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 4. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: On 31 December 2019, an epidemic of pneumonia of unknown aetiology was first reported in the city of Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China. A rapidly progressing epidemic of COVID-19 ensued within China, with multiple exportations to other countries. We aimed to measure perceptions and responses towards COVID-19 in three countries to understand how population-level anxiety can be mitigated in the early phases of a pandemic. METHODS: Between February and March 2020, we conducted online surveys in Singapore, China and Italy with a total of 4505 respondents to measure respondents' knowledge, perceptions, anxiety and behaviours towards the COVID-19 epidemic, and identified factors associated with lower anxiety and more positive behavioural responses. RESULTS: Respondents reported high awareness of COVID-19 and its accompanying symptoms, comparable information-seeking habits and similarly high levels of information sufficiency, adherence to and acceptance of public health control measures. Higher self-efficacy was associated with lower anxiety levels in all three countries, while willingness to comply with restrictive measures and greater information sufficiency were associated with more positive behavioural changes to reduce spread of infection. CONCLUSION: Population-level anxiety and behavioural responses to an outbreak can be influenced by information provided. This should be used to inform future outbreak preparedness plans, taking into account the importance of increasing population-level self-efficacy and information sufficiency to reduce anxiety and promote positive behavioural changes.
BACKGROUND: On 31 December 2019, an epidemic of pneumonia of unknown aetiology was first reported in the city of Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China. A rapidly progressing epidemic of COVID-19 ensued within China, with multiple exportations to other countries. We aimed to measure perceptions and responses towards COVID-19 in three countries to understand how population-level anxiety can be mitigated in the early phases of a pandemic. METHODS: Between February and March 2020, we conducted online surveys in Singapore, China and Italy with a total of 4505 respondents to measure respondents' knowledge, perceptions, anxiety and behaviours towards the COVID-19 epidemic, and identified factors associated with lower anxiety and more positive behavioural responses. RESULTS: Respondents reported high awareness of COVID-19 and its accompanying symptoms, comparable information-seeking habits and similarly high levels of information sufficiency, adherence to and acceptance of public health control measures. Higher self-efficacy was associated with lower anxiety levels in all three countries, while willingness to comply with restrictive measures and greater information sufficiency were associated with more positive behavioural changes to reduce spread of infection. CONCLUSION: Population-level anxiety and behavioural responses to an outbreak can be influenced by information provided. This should be used to inform future outbreak preparedness plans, taking into account the importance of increasing population-level self-efficacy and information sufficiency to reduce anxiety and promote positive behavioural changes.
Authors: Jane M Lim; Zaw Myo Tun; Vishakha Kumar; Sharon Esi Duoduwa Quaye; Vittoria Offeddu; Alex R Cook; May Oo Lwin; Shaohai Jiang; Clarence C Tam Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses Date: 2020-09-05 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Marloes Bults; Desirée Jma Beaujean; Onno de Zwart; Gerjo Kok; Pepijn van Empelen; Jim E van Steenbergen; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Hélène Acm Voeten Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-01-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rachael Pung; Calvin J Chiew; Barnaby E Young; Sarah Chin; Mark I-C Chen; Hannah E Clapham; Alex R Cook; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Matthias P H S Toh; Cuiqin Poh; Mabel Low; Joshua Lum; Valerie T J Koh; Tze M Mak; Lin Cui; Raymond V T P Lin; Derrick Heng; Yee-Sin Leo; David C Lye; Vernon J M Lee Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jane M Lim; Zaw Myo Tun; Vishakha Kumar; Sharon Esi Duoduwa Quaye; Vittoria Offeddu; Alex R Cook; May Oo Lwin; Shaohai Jiang; Clarence C Tam Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses Date: 2020-09-05 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: S Vivek Anand; Yao Kang Shuy; Poay Sian Sabrina Lee; Eng Sing Lee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Irina Georgieva; Tella Lantta; Jakub Lickiewicz; Jaroslav Pekara; Sofia Wikman; Marina Loseviča; Bevinahalli Nanjegowda Raveesh; Adriana Mihai; Peter Lepping Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Holly Blake; Jessica Corner; Cecilia Cirelli; Juliet Hassard; Lydia Briggs; Janet M Daly; Malcolm Bennett; Joseph G Chappell; Lucy Fairclough; C Patrick McClure; Alexander Tarr; Patrick Tighe; Alex Favier; William Irving; Jonathan Ball Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 3.390