Literature DB >> 16897316

Efficacy of signal-averaged electrocardiography in the young orthotopic heart transplant patient to detect allograft rejection.

M S Horenstein1, S F Idriss, R M Hamilton, R J Kanter, P A Webster, P P Karpawich.   

Abstract

Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard survey for cardiac graft rejection. Signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) identifies slowly conducting, diseased myocardium. We sought to determine whether SAECG is a sensitive, noninvasive transplant surveillance method in the young.Ninety-four SAECGs recorded prior to biopsy in 20 young transplant (OHT) patients and those from 15 healthy age-matched controls (CTL) were analyzed. In the OHT group, 56 no-rejection (NOREJ) (ISHLT grades 0 or 1 A) and 37 acute rejection (REJ) (ISHLT grades IB, 2, and 3A) SAECGs were compared, SAECGs were filtered at 40-255 Hz. Total QRS duration (QRSd), duration of terminal low amplitude of QRS under 40 microV (LAS), and root mean square amplitude of terminal 40 msec of QRS (RMS40) were compared.SAECGs were significantly different in CTL vs NOREJ but not in NOREJ vs REJ: QRSd, 81.7 +/- 8, 107.2 +/- 18.4, and 112.3 +/- 21.6 msec, respectively; LAS, (18 +/- 5.8, 23.6 +/- 10.7, and 27 +/- 14.8 msec, respectively; and RMS40, (169.3 +/- 100.4, 68 +/- 48.8, and 57.5 +/- 45.6 microV, respectively. Children following OHT exhibited significant differences in the SAECG compared to controls. Differences between the NOREJ and REJ groups were negligible. Therefore, SAECG may not be effective in detecting OHT rejection in the young.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897316     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-005-1155-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  35 in total

1.  Influence of autonomic tone on the filtered QRS duration from signal averaged electrocardiograms in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Nakagawa; T Iwao; H Abe; S Ishida; N Takahashi; T Fujino; H Yonemochi; T Saikawa; M Ito
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Different evolutions in heart rate variability after heart transplantation: 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Frank Beckers; Dirk Ramaekers; Gabrielle Speijer; Hugo Ector; Johan Vanhaecke; Bart Verheyden; Johan Van Cleemput; Walter Droogné; Frans Van de Werf; André E Aubert
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  The utility of pacemaker evoked T wave amplitude for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  A D Bainbridge; M Cave; S Newell; M Delaney; J Parameshwar; S R Large; J Wallwork; A A Grace; N R Carey; P M Schofield
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Pathology of the conduction system in cardiac rejection.

Authors:  C P Bieber; E B Stinson; N E Shumway
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Signal-averaged electrocardiography of the terminal QRS in healthy young adults.

Authors:  D A Danford; J A Stelling; J D Kugler; J P Cheatham; L A Latson; C H Gumbiner; P J Hofschire
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Relation between myocardial viability and abnormalities on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with low (<40%) ejection fraction and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M Ragosta; P R Pagley; J P DiMarco; G A Beller
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Heart rate variability after cardiac transplantation in humans.

Authors:  D Ramaekers; H Ector; J Vanhaecke; J van Cleemput; F van de Werf
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 8.  Pediatric heart transplantation.

Authors:  Robert J Boucek; Mark M Boucek
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.856

9.  Incidence and prognostic value of electrocardiographic abnormalities after heart transplantation.

Authors:  D Golshayan; C Seydoux; D G Berguer; F Stumpe; M Hurni; P Ruchat; A Fischer; X Mueller; H Sadeghi; L von Segesser; J J Goy
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Detecting acute graft rejection in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation: analysis of heart rate variability in the frequency domain.

Authors:  A W Frey; P Uberfuhr; H Achakri; A Fuchs; B Reichart; K Theisen
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive cardiac allograft rejection surveillance: reliability and clinical value for prevention of heart failure.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.