Literature DB >> 3288675

Sensitivity and specificity of assessing coronary bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multicenter study.

W Stanford1, B H Brundage, R MacMillan, E V Chomka, T M Bateman, W J Eldredge, M J Lipton, C W White, R F Wilson, M R Johnson.   

Abstract

Because a significant number of all patients seen by cardiologists have had coronary bypass surgery, a relatively noninvasive method of assessing coronary bypass graft patency would be very helpful. Ultrafast computed tomography, by virtue of its rapid data acquisition time and reasonable spatial resolution, may be useful in this regard. To determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy of this imaging modality as compared with cardiac catheterization, a multicenter study was undertaken. There were two parts to the study. Part I involved the evaluation of 179 grafts in 74 patients studied in the five participating centers between March 1985 and August 1986. Twenty-nine percent of these graft studies were found to be technically inadequate and were excluded before patency determinations began. The remaining group of 127 bypass grafts in 62 patients had studies adequate for interpretation. Fifty-one grafts were to the left anterior descending coronary artery or a diagonal branch, 37 to branches of the left circumflex artery and 28 to the right coronary artery or a posterior descending vessel; in addition, there were 11 internal mammary artery bypass grafts primarily into the left anterior descending or diagonal artery distribution. The sensitivity of detecting angiographically open grafts was 93.4%, the specificity of detecting angiographically closed grafts 88.9% and the predictive accuracy was 92.1%. A subsequent study (Part 2) was performed 9 months later to assess the ability to carry out technically adequate examinations. Of the 138 consecutive graft examinations (50 patients) included in this part of the study, 94.2% of the examinations were found to be technically adequate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3288675     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90348-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

Review 1.  Ultrafast CT and the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  M S Bleiweis; D Georgiou; B H Brundage
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

2.  Assessment of coronary artery stent patency by electron-beam CT.

Authors:  Friedrich D Knollmann; Jörg Möller; Axel Gebert; Christian Bethge; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging vs. ultrafast computed tomography for cardiac diagnosis.

Authors:  R M MacMillan
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

4.  Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Maria Luigia Storto; Nicola Maddestra; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Identification of coronary artery by-pass grafts: reliability of MRI in clinical practice.

Authors:  P Di Renzi; F Fedele; E Di Cesare; P Pavone; F Fabietti; S Sciomer; D C Vizza; A Dagianti; R Passariello
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

Review 6.  Advances in cardiovascular CT imaging: CT clinical imaging.

Authors:  William Stanford
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Computed tomography assessment of coronary bypass grafts: ready to replace conventional angiography?

Authors:  Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Does angioplasty need on site surgical cover? A surgeon's view.

Authors:  D J Parker
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-07

Review 9.  A practical approach to MRI of coronary artery bypass graft patency and flow.

Authors:  A C van Rossum; M A Galjee; J C Post; C A Visser
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

Review 10.  The role of magnetic resonance in the evaluation of functional results after CABG/PTCA.

Authors:  A C van Rossum; M A Galjee; T Doesburg; M Hofman; J Valk
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.