Mengdi Bao1, Erik Jensen2, Yu Chang1, Grant Korensky1, Ke Du1,3,4. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623, United States. 2. HJ Science & Technology Inc., Berkeley, California 94710, United States. 3. Department of Microsystems Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623, United States. 4. School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623, United States.
Abstract
We have developed a novel detection system that couples clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-Cas recognition of target sequences, Cas-mediated nucleic acid probe cleavage, and quantum dots as highly sensitive reporter molecules for simple detection of viral nucleic acid targets. After target recognition and Cas-mediated cleavage of biotinylated ssDNA probe molecules, the probe molecules are bound to magnetic beads. A complementary ssDNA oligonucleotide quantum dot conjugate is then added, which only hybridizes to uncleaved probes on the magnetic beads. After separating hybridized quantum dots, the collected supernatant is illuminated by a portable ultraviolet flashlight, and it provides a simple "Yes-or-No" nucleic acid detection answer. By using a DNA target matching part of the African swine fever virus, detection limits of ∼0.5 and ∼1.25 nM are achieved in buffer and porcine plasma, respectively. The positive samples are readily confirmed by visual inspection, completely avoiding the need for complicated devices and instruments. This work establishes the feasibility of a simple assay for nucleic acid screening in both hospitals and point-of-care settings.
We have developed a novel detection system that couples clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-Cas recognition of target sequences, Cas-mediated nucleic acid probe cleavage, and quantum dots as highly sensitive reporter molecules for simple detection of viral nucleic acid targets. After target recognition and Cas-mediated cleavage of biotinylated ssDNA probe molecules, the probe molecules are bound to magnetic beads. A complementary ssDNA oligonucleotide quantum dot conjugate is then added, which only hybridizes to uncleaved probes on the magnetic beads. After separating hybridized quantum dots, the collected supernatant is illuminated by a portable ultraviolet flashlight, and it provides a simple "Yes-or-No" nucleic acid detection answer. By using a DNA target matching part of the African swine fever virus, detection limits of ∼0.5 and ∼1.25 nM are achieved in buffer and porcine plasma, respectively. The positive samples are readily confirmed by visual inspection, completely avoiding the need for complicated devices and instruments. This work establishes the feasibility of a simple assay for nucleic acid screening in both hospitals and point-of-care settings.
Intensified infectious disease outbreaks occurred more frequently in the past
few decades due to the increased human population and global travel and
included viruses as SARS,[1,2] Ebola,[3,4]
Zika,[5,6] MERS,[7,8] and the novel coronavirus
(SARS-CoV-2).[9,10] The ongoing COVID-19 crisis has
evolved as a global pandemic since it was first reported in December 2019.
Due to the shortages of testing kits, vaccines, and treatments, the number
of cases still rapidly increases in many countries. Since the development of
vaccines and treatments for novel viruses can take as long as 18 months, the
most efficient immediate approach to slow down and contain epidemics is to
provide rapid and widespread testing followed by the isolation of positive
cases and their close contacts. The current standard tests for viral
infection use highly sensitive and specific real-time polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR).[11,12] Although these tests are highly sensitive accurate,
they require a laboratory setting for use, bulky instruments, sophisticated
operations, and they are therefore not field-deployable. These issues
present a significant bottleneck to rapid and widespread testing, hindering
our ability to respond to emerging pandemics. Recently, rapid point-of-care
(POC) systems using isothermal amplification were demonstrated for viral
pathogen detection;[13] however, they have very limited
throughput and are not field-deployable due to the complexity of the
instrumentation. Given the limitations of existing viral pathogen testing
methods, there is a significant need for simpler testing methodologies that
do not require complex instrumentation and that can be performed easily in
the field.An ideal POC device that can combat modern era pandemic crises should be
simple, inexpensive, and accurate and must be easily operated and understood
by people without special training. A recently discovered technology called
clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) in
conjunction with CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas) showed great promise as an
alternative to RT-PCR detection.[14,15] This method is significantly
simpler than RT-PCR since it does not require complicated instrumentation to
perform. Certain Cas nucleases such as Cas12a and Cas13a can be activated to
indiscriminately cleave single-stranded DNA or RNA substrates once they
identify and bind with the target DNA or RNA.[16,17] The activated
Cas enzymes cleave a nucleic acid probe, releasing a fluorophore from a
quencher molecule, thereby generating signals. CRISPR-Cas systems have also
been linked with isothermal amplification methods to achieve highly
sensitive and specific detection of pathogens.[18,19] However, most
of the CRISPR-Cas detection systems utilize reporter probes with organic
dyes and quenchers that require external instruments and possess a high
fluorescence background, which limits overall sensitivity.[20]In this study, we develop a novel probe system for CRISPR-Cas nucleic acid
assays that use quantum dots (Qdots) as a reporter. Compared to conventional
organic fluorescence dyes, Qdots have unique electronic and optical
properties such as stable signal intensity, a narrow emission spectrum, a
continuous broad excitation spectrum, and high quantum yields, making them
an ideal fluorescence indicator for in vitro
diagnostics.[21,22] After target recognition and
Cas-mediated cleavage of biotinylated ssDNA probe molecules, the probe
molecules are bound to streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. A complementary
ssDNA oligonucleotide quantum dot conjugate is then added, which only
hybridizes to uncleaved probes on the magnetic beads. After separation of
hybridized from unhybridized quantum dot conjugates by magnetic
sequestration, the signal is measured fluorometrically to provide a signal
to indicate the cleavage activity and therefore the presence of target
nucleic acid. Our use of magnetic bead sequestration effectively reduces the
background signal, enabling use of highly sensitive quantum dots as
reporters. As a proof of principle for viral pathogen detection, a
double-stranded DNA segment matching a portion of the Africanswinefever
virus (ASFV) genome was selected as the detection target.A CRISPR-Cas12a system, considered as a revolutionary tool for biosensing
applications, can identify double-stranded DNA targets and indiscriminately
degrade single-stranded DNA.[23,24,14] Unlike Cas9
proteins, Cas12a proteins are guided by a single-stranded RNA sequence
without any trans-activating CRISPR RNAs (tracrRNAs), thereby making them
simpler to design and operate.[25,26] In this work, a Cas12a enzyme is
chosen mainly because it can be activated by dsDNA, corresponding to the
structure of ASFV. Generally, the Cas12a enzyme relies on a short DNA
sequence, also called as a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), adjacent to the
complementary crRNA-dsDNA regions for target recognition. Since the Cas12a
enzyme requires a T nucleotide-rich PAM sequence adjacent to the
complementary crRNA-dsDNA regions for nucleic acid
identification,[23,24,14] we chose the
sequence following TTTC in the ASFV genome as the matching regions for Cas12
identification (Figure S2). Previous studies showed that CRISPR-Cas12a can
distinguish single- or double-base mismatches between the crRNA and
double-stranded DNA target.[27,28] In this work, we chose the matched
target and mismatched sequences both from the B646L gene of ASFV (accession
number NC_044959). Without target amplification, we achieved a
detection limit of 0.5 nM by using a small and inexpensive UV flashlight as
an excitation source. No fluorescence signal was detected in mismatched
samples, demonstrating the high selectivity of our strategy. Even though a
vision difference can lead to inevitable ambiguity for the visual detection
method, our sensitivity is determined based on the photographs that were
taken by the digital cameras with much lower light sensitivity than human
eyes.[29,30] To verify the reliability of visual detection, the
fluorescence intensity of every sample was also measured by a laser-based
fluorometer and was consistent with naked-eye observation. Our new protocol
adds a bead-washing protocol, thus significantly reducing the high
fluorescence background originated from dye-quencher substrates in bodily
fluids.[31] A comparable sensitivity in porcine
plasma and buffer is achieved without additional sample preparation steps.
This simple and colorimetric protocol paves the way for next-generation POC
and field-deployable viral pathogen detection applications.
Results
Figure a shows the workflow of the
Qdots-CRISPR-based colorimetric nucleic acid detection. Cas12a first binds
with crRNA, forming a Cas12a-crRNA complex. Then, oligonucleotide DNA linker
probes with a biotin label are added into the complex as substrates. With
the presence of a double-stranded target DNA (part of the ASFV genome), the
Cas12a-crRNA complex is activated and indiscriminately cleaves the
single-stranded linker probes in the assay. After the reaction,
streptavidin-coated magnetic beads are added, which bind both cleaved and
uncleaved linker probes. A complementary oligonucleotide DNA reporter probe,
which is conjugated to quantum dots, is then added. The reporter probe only
binds to uncleaved linker probes on the magnetic beads. An external magnet
is then applied to isolate the magnetic beads, leaving the unbound reporter
probes in the eluate for fluorescence analysis. Since the cleavage of the
linker probe is related to the amount of reporter probes remaining in the
eluate, the fluorescence signal indicates the presence of the starting
target in the sample.
Figure 1
(a) Scheme for the Qdots-CRISPR-based colorimetric nucleic acid
detection strategy. (b) Schematic of the simple detection by
using Qdots. (c) TEM images: (i) streptavidin-coated Qdots, (ii)
streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, and (iii) MB-Qdot
conjugation. The MB-Qdot conjugation includes magnetic beads,
linker probe A, reporter probe B, and Qdots. Scale bars are 50
nm.
(a) Scheme for the Qdots-CRISPR-based colorimetric nucleic acid
detection strategy. (b) Schematic of the simple detection by
using Qdots. (c) TEM images: (i) streptavidin-coated Qdots, (ii)
streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, and (iii) MB-Qdot
conjugation. The MB-Qdot conjugation includes magnetic beads,
linker probe A, reporter probe B, and Qdots. Scale bars are 50
nm.Figure b further shows the workflow
of our detection scheme: cleaved and uncleaved linker probes are immobilized
on the magnetic beads followed by the hybridization with Qdot reporter
probes. Magnetic isolation separates unhybridized reporter probes, leaving
probes in the eluate that indicates the presence of the starting target
nucleic acid. Then, fluorescence measurement can be performed with the
illumination of an inexpensive and portable flashlight.Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the streptavidin-coated
quantum dots (mean diameter of 17.5 nm), streptavidin-coated magnetic beads
(mean diameter of 1 μm), and hybridization of the Qdot reporter probe
onto linker probes bound to the magnetic beads are presented in Figure c. Numerous Qdots are
immobilized on the magnetic bead by the complementary hybridization of
reporter probes and linker probes.A custom-designed fluorometer was used to confirm the successful formation of
conjugates. As shown in Figure a,
streptavidin-coated Qdots (156 fmol) show a fluorescence intensity of
∼24 counts (Qdot, green). MB-Qdot conjugation composed of magnetic
beads (100 μg), linker probes A (25 pmol), reporter probes B (12.5
pmol), and Qdots (156 fmol) was mixed in a solution of 60 μL and
pulled down by a magnet. Since the input Qdots were saturated by the other
three components, no fluorescence signal was detected in the supernatant
(conjugation, red). To confirm that the MB-Qdot conjugation was made by the
hybridization of two DNA strands, we mixed magnetic beads, reporter probes,
and Qdots without the input of linker probes. After magnetic isolation, a
high fluorescence intensity (∼14 counts) was detected, indicating
that the MB-Qdot conjugate is mainly achieved by DNA complementary
hybridization rather than non-specific absorption (control, blue). In the
future, streptavidin-coated magnetic beads can be treated with blocking
reagents such as bovine serum albumin[32] to reduce the
non-specific binding. To further confirm the MB-Qdot conjugation, the beads
were washed 5 times followed by DNase I (EN0521, ThermoFisher Scientific)
treatment to degrade the hybridized DNA strands. As shown in Figure b, a distinct fluorescence
peak was detected in the conjugation sample (red), while no signal was
observed in the control sample (blue). The integrated signals of the
fluorescence spectra (550–700 nm) were plotted (inset of Figure b), where the conjugation
sample shows ∼2000 counts, which is approximately 13 times higher
than that of the control sample. In addition, for the conjugation sample,
the bright pink fluoresence signal is easily observed by using a
flashlight.
Figure 2
Validation of the MB-Qdot conjugation formation. (a) Emission
curves of collected supernatants. The conjugation sample
consists of magnetic beads, DNA probes, and Qdots. The control
sample consists of magnetic beads, Qdots, and reporter probes.
The Qdot sample is the streptavidin-coated Qdots (2.6 nM). (b)
Fluorescence signals of released Qdots by DNase treatment versus
streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. The inset shows the
integrated fluorescence signals and photographs of the
suspensions under UV illumination. Error bars are standard
deviation of the mean.
Validation of the MB-Qdot conjugation formation. (a) Emission
curves of collected supernatants. The conjugation sample
consists of magnetic beads, DNA probes, and Qdots. The control
sample consists of magnetic beads, Qdots, and reporter probes.
The Qdot sample is the streptavidin-coated Qdots (2.6 nM). (b)
Fluorescence signals of released Qdots by DNase treatment versus
streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. The inset shows the
integrated fluorescence signals and photographs of the
suspensions under UV illumination. Error bars are standard
deviation of the mean.We then optimized the MB-Qdot conjugation assay to decrease the fluorescence
background, which is essential for the CRISPR-Cas12a-based detection
strategy. Linker probes (100 pmol) with 3′ FAM modification
(/5BioTinTEG/TTATTCTTATTGTGTGAACTGCTCCTTCTTGACTCCACC/36-FAM/) were
introduced to bind with the magnetic beads at weights of 0, 25, 100, 400,
and 600 μg at room temperature for 15 min. After incubation, the
magnetic beads were isolated, and the fluorescence intensity of the
unbounded ssDNA was measured by using a commercial spectrofluorometer (JASCO
FP-8500, USA). As shown in Figure a, the integrated fluorescence intensity (500–700 nm)
dramatically drops with an increase in the magnetic bead input from 0 to 400
μg. Adding more magnetic beads does not decrease the fluorescence
intensity, indicating that the saturated ratio of magnetic beads to linker
probe A is ∼4 μg:1 pmol. Next, we optimized the ratio of
reporter probes B to Qdots, which is the key to eliminate the fluorescence
background. One pmol of Qdots was selected, and the load of reporter probe B
was varied from 0 to 80 pmol. As shown in Figure b, a ratio of 80:1 between reporter probe B
and Qdots shows the lowest background and is used for nucleic acid
detection. To determine the optimized hybridization condition of linker
probe A and reporter probe B, Qdots with a load of 0.5 pmol were premixed
with 40 pmol of reporter probe B (ratio of 1:80) and then allowed to
hybridize with magnetic bead-linker probe A conjugation (ratio of 4
μg:1 pmol). The retrieved Qdots were then measured by a
custom-designed fluorometer. The fluorescence intensity of the supernatant
drops significantly by increasing the load of linker probe A from 20 to 50
pmol (Figure c). However, the
intensity only shows a slight change when the load is further increased to
80 and 100 pmol. Thus, we concluded that the saturated ratio of linker probe
A to reporter probe B is ∼2:1.
Figure 3
Optimization of the MB-Qdot conjugation. (a) Integrated
fluorescence signal of unbound linker probe A versus the input
load of magnetic beads (0–600 μg). (b) Integrated
fluorescence signal of unbound Qdots versus the input load of
reporter probe B (0–80 pmol). (c) Integrated fluorescence
signals of the collected Qdot supernatant versus the input load
of linker probe A (0–100 pmol). Insets show the
photographs of Qdots under UV illumination. Error bars represent
standard deviation of the mean.
Optimization of the MB-Qdot conjugation. (a) Integrated
fluorescence signal of unbound linker probe A versus the input
load of magnetic beads (0–600 μg). (b) Integrated
fluorescence signal of unbound Qdots versus the input load of
reporter probe B (0–80 pmol). (c) Integrated fluorescence
signals of the collected Qdot supernatant versus the input load
of linker probe A (0–100 pmol). Insets show the
photographs of Qdots under UV illumination. Error bars represent
standard deviation of the mean.With the optimized MB-Qdot conjugation assay in hand, we then applied this
protocol for CRISPR detection. We added target DNA into a tube containing 50
nM Cas12a, 62.5 nM crRNA, and 1.25 μM linker probe A with a total
volume of 20 μL. The detection was performed in the dark, and the
flashlight was placed ∼40 cm over the Qdot supernatants. Photographs
of the supernatants were taken by a digital camera with 1/25 s exposure time
and an 800 iso value and used as the standard to determine the detection
sensitivity. As presented in Figure a, under flashlight illumination, a distinct pink color is
observed with a target concentration higher than 0.5 nM. No distinct
fluorescence difference with a concentration higher than 0.75 nM was
detected. This is caused by the high turnover rate of the CRISPR-Cas12a
complex, degrading almost all the linker probes and leaving the same amount
of Qdots-reporter probe B conjugates in the supernatant. On the other hand,
the collected supernatants do not show any fluorescence signals without a
target input or with a mismatched target sequence. These results were then
validated by using the custom-designed fluorometer and are presented in
Figure b. The intensities of
matched target DNA samples with concentrations of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2.5, 10, and
50 nM are significantly higher than those of the mismatched or blank
samples. The experiment was repeated three times on different days, and each
sample was measured three times to ensure the accuracy of the results. These
results were further confirmed by TEM imaging. As shown in Figure c, for blank and mismatched samples,
Qdots with an average diameter of 17.5 nm were linked on the magnetic bead
via linker probe A and reporter probe B hybridization. On the other hand,
for samples containing target DNA, Qdots are not observed in the TEM image,
indicating that the linker probes were denatured and left the Qdots
suspended in the solution for detection.
Figure 4
Qdots-CRISPR-based nucleic acid detections. (a) Fluorescence images
of samples containing (i) matched target DNA (positive), (ii)
mismatched target sequence (negative), and (iii) blank (no
target input). The samples were illuminated by a UV flashlight
(wavelength of 395 nm). (b) Integrated fluorescence signal
(624–1022 nm) of (i) matched target DNA (black triangle),
(ii) mismatched target sequence (green triangle), and (iii)
blank sample (0 nM). The red dashed line shows the logistic fit
of the integrated fluorescence intensity versus DNA
concentration. (c) TEM images of the magnetic beads mixed with
(i) matched target DNA, (ii) mismatched target sequence, and
(iii) blank (no target input).
Qdots-CRISPR-based nucleic acid detections. (a) Fluorescence images
of samples containing (i) matched target DNA (positive), (ii)
mismatched target sequence (negative), and (iii) blank (no
target input). The samples were illuminated by a UV flashlight
(wavelength of 395 nm). (b) Integrated fluorescence signal
(624–1022 nm) of (i) matched target DNA (black triangle),
(ii) mismatched target sequence (green triangle), and (iii)
blank sample (0 nM). The red dashed line shows the logistic fit
of the integrated fluorescence intensity versus DNA
concentration. (c) TEM images of the magnetic beads mixed with
(i) matched target DNA, (ii) mismatched target sequence, and
(iii) blank (no target input).To verify that our MB-Qdot assay can directly work with bodily fluids, we
spiked target DNA into porcine plasma (P2891-10 mL, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA)
and applied our MB-Qdot assay. As shown in Figure , a clear pink color is observed with a
target concentration higher than 1.25 nM, whereas the blank sample shows no
color. To validate the visual readout, the supernatants were measured by a
custom-designed fluorometer. The fluorescence intensities of target
concentrations at 1.25, 1.5, 2, and 10 nM are all higher than those of the
samples without a target.
Figure 5
Integrated fluorescence spectra (624–1022 nm) of
Qdots-CRISPR-based nucleic acid detection in porcine plasma,
measured by a custom-designed fluorometer. The samples are
composed of matched target DNA spiked into porcine plasma. The
red dashed line represents the logistic fit of integrated
fluorescence signals versus DNA concentration. (insets)
Fluorescence images of each sample with flashlight illumination
(excitation of 395 nm).
Integrated fluorescence spectra (624–1022 nm) of
Qdots-CRISPR-based nucleic acid detection in porcine plasma,
measured by a custom-designed fluorometer. The samples are
composed of matched target DNA spiked into porcine plasma. The
red dashed line represents the logistic fit of integrated
fluorescence signals versus DNA concentration. (insets)
Fluorescence images of each sample with flashlight illumination
(excitation of 395 nm).
Discussion
The work presented here leverages a CRISPR-Cas12a assay and uses Qdots as an
indicator. The product of the quantum yield and absorption coefficient in
Qdots is ∼3 fold higher than that of organic dyes, demonstrating
Qdots as an ideal reporter for simple visual detection.[33,21,34] CRISPR-Cas12a cleavage is a robust target
recognition method that can maintain high cleavage efficiency even after 16
h incubation.[31] Preassembled crRNA and Cas12a can also
protect crRNA from degradation.[35] Target-specific CRISPR
cleavage was performed at 37 °C, while other experiments were performed
at room temperature. Unlike methods such as PCR,[36,37]
electrochemical sensing,[38,39] and surface-enhanced Raman
spectroscopy,[40,41] our assay does not require
time-consuming sample processing, bulky sensing instruments, or complicated
expert operation and data interpretation. These unique advantages enable us
to demonstrate a simple diagnosis assay, ideal for on-field applications.
Our strategy can provide a simple “Yes-or-No” answer without
trained personnel, ideal for massive screening during outbreaks. It can be
used in many locations, such as stadiums, airports, and customs without
relying on bulky and complicated instruments.Using our Qdot-CRISPR-based DNA detection strategy, we report a very low
detection background compared to conventional CRISPR-Cas systems that use
fluorophore-quencher substrates as reporters. The cleaved ssDNA probes
linked to the Qdots are detected by isolating the magnetic beads, thus
avoiding the high background issues from the uncleaved fluorophore-quencher
probes in the assay. This is essential to enhance the overall detection
sensitivity of CRISPR-Cas systems and is especially useful for simple
detection in resource-limited environments.[42,43] More importantly, the
high background originated from fluorophore-quencher substrates in
unpurified bodily fluids is greatly reduced, which is the key to reduce
complicated sample preparation for “real-world”
diagnostics.We previously developed an integrated POC system for ASFV detection by using a
laser-based fluorometer and conventional dye-quencher substrates.[31] A high fluorescence background originated from
dye-quencher probes in unpurified porcine plasma was observed, and it
severely affected the detection sensitivity. In this work, we developed a
magnetic bead-Qdot conjugation protocol. Qdots provide much higher
fluorescence signals than organic dyes and can be excited by a portable
flashlight. The utilization of magnetic beads reduces the background from
the substrates in plasma, achieving comparable sensitivity in plasma and
buffer solutions.Unlike PCR that requires ultra-purified buffer solutions,[44,45] one of the
unique advantages of CRISPR-based detection is that the collateral cleavage
process is not affected much by the presence of nucleases in bodily fluids.
For example, numerous studies have shown the sensitive detection of nucleic
acid samples in urine,[46] saliva,[17] and
plasma[47] samples without stringent purification.
However, to meet the requirements of “real-world” POC
diagnostics, a nucleic acid concentration step may still be needed as the
lysis process could result in the dilution and loss of target samples,
especially when the viral load is low. In addition, CRISPR-based detection
can only work with known genomic sequences, which may take time to respond
during emerging outbreaks.Currently, our approach can achieve a detection limit of ∼0.5 nM without
any target amplification. To improve the detection sensitivity, our assay
can be easily integrated with well-established nucleic acid amplification
methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR),[48]
recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA),[16,49] and loop-mediated
isothermal amplification (LAMP).[50,51] The amplification reagents can be
mixed with CRISPR-Cas12a proteins and crRNA as a “one-pot”
assay.Furthermore, our assay is poised to be developed for high-throughput
multiplexing detection purposes. The current method can achieve
high-throughput detection as multiple samples can be excited at the same
time. In the future, robotic pipetting[52,53] and automated
microfluidics[54,55] can be integrated with our assay to
further increase the throughput. Because CRISPR-Cas12a assay is an
indiscriminate DNase activity,[14,31] linker probe A and reporter probe B
can be used as universal reporters for the detection of various DNA targets
by only changing the crRNA sequence to match the target sequence. In
addition, Cas13a proteins demonstrate a similar indiscriminate RNase
activity to Cas12a.[56,16] Our assay could work with RNA-based viruses by
including a well-established reverse transcription process or changing the
DNA probes to RNA probes.[57,58] Thus, our assay presented here
should be able to detect both DNA and RNA targets for multiplexing
detection.
Conclusions
To avoid bulky and complicated sensing instruments, in this work, we developed
a simple visual detection system coupled with quantum dots as an
ultra-brightness indicator and CRISPR-Cas12a assay for isothermal viral DNA
target sensing. Illuminated by a handheld flashlight, the positive samples
are visually distinguishable from negative samples. Multiple samples can be
simultaneously excited, making it ideal for rapid and large-scale POC
screening. Furthermore, by introducing a simple magnetic bead purification
process, a low fluorescence background in plasma samples was detected,
achieving a comparable detection sensitivity within buffer. Our work lays
down the foundation for future molecular diagnostics without using
expensive, tedious, and time-consuming sample purification and detection
instruments.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Both the matched target and mismatched sequence were chosen from the
B646L gene in the African swine fever virus strain (accession number
NC_044959), corresponding to the previous
outbreaks.[59] CRISPR RNA (crRNA) contains two
regions, a short direct repeat and a spacer that has a complementary
sequence to the ASFV target. Single-stranded linker DNA probes and
reporter probes were both labeled with biotin tags. Binding buffer
(1×) is composed of 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 0.1 mg/mL BSA. Synthetic RNAoligonucleotides
were purchased from IDT, Inc., and the pellets were suspended in TE
buffer (10 nM Tris, 0.1 nM EDTA, pH 8.0). Nuclease-free water and
RNase-free microtubes were used to prevent RNA degradation.
Instruments
A 395 nm flashlight (brand, Vansky; part number, VS-FL03-V; spectral
bandwidth of 30 nm) with 5 W output power was used to illuminate the
Qdots. A commercial spectrofluorometer (JASCO FP-8500, USA) and a
laser-based fluorometer were both used to measure the fluorescence
signals. The design of the sensitive fluorometer was presented in our
previous works.[31,56] Briefly, liquid samples were loaded in a
disposable cartridge and then placed on top of the fluorometer. The
fluorometer comprises a continuous laser (488 nm, 3 mW power) to
excite the samples, an off-axis parabolic (OAP) mirror to collect
fluorescence signals, and a 488 nm notch filter to filter excitation
light. An optical fiber (M93L01, Thorlabs) was used to transmit the
fluorescence signals, and a USB spectrometer (USB 2000+, Ocean Optics)
was used to record the spectra.
CRISPR-Cas12a-Based Linker Probe A Cleavage
The total volume of CRISPR-Cas12a-based cleavage assay was 20 μL
including LbCas12a proteins (New England BioLabs, Inc.), crRNA, linker
probe A, and binding buffer. Briefly, 50 nM LbCas12a was assembled
with 62.5 nM crRNA at room temperature for 10 min. Afterward, 1.25
μM linker probe A, 1× binding buffer, 14.5 μL of
nuclease-free water (IDT, Inc.), and target DNA (concentration ranging
from 0.1 to 50 nM) were mixed with the LbCas12a-crRNA complex to
initiate the reaction. The mixture was incubated in a water bath at 37
°C for 120 min to ensure optimized cleavage activity. All the
nucleic acids used in the assay were purchased from IDT, Inc., and the
sequences are given in Table .
First, 10 μL of magnetic beads (Dynabeads MyOne Stretpavidin C1,
ThermoFisher Scientific) was washed with PBS buffer (Gibco TM, PH 7.4)
three times and resuspended in 10 μL of PBS buffer. Next, the
washed magnetic beads were transferred to a new 0.2 mL PCR tube, and
the supernatant was discarded by isolating the magnetic beads with a
magnetic rack (NEBNext magnetic separation rack, New England BioLabs,
Inc.). The collateral cleaved products by CRISPR were then added to
the magnetic beads at room temperature for 15 min. After incubation,
the magnetic bead-linker probe A conjugation was washed and
resuspended in 20 μL PBS buffer for later use.
Reporter Probe B Conjugation with Quantum Dots (Qdots)
Qdots (Qdot 605 ITK streptavidin conjugate kit, ThermoFisher Scientific)
with a concentration of 15.6 nM were mixed with 1.25 μM reporter
probe B (IDT, Inc.) to reach a 10 μL reaction mixture. To avoid
photo-bleaching issues, the mixture was incubated in a dark
environment at room temperature for 15 min.
Hybridization of Linker Probe A and Reporter Probe B
The supernatant of the magnetic bead-linker probe A conjugation was first
evacuated followed by mixing with the reporter probe B-Qdot
conjugation. The mixture was placed on a tube rotator (BS-RTMNI-1,
STELLAR SCIENTIFIC) and allowed to react at room temperature under
mild shaking for 90 min. After that, the supernatant was collected and
transferred to a new PCR tube.
Colorimetric Detection and Fluorescence Quantification
For naked-eye detection, the samples were placed 40 cm away from a
portable flashlight (wavelength of 395 nm) in a dark room. Sensitivity
is determined based on the photographs taken by a digital camera with
1/25 s exposure time and an 800 iso value in the dark. To validate the
naked-eye detection, every sample was also quantified with a
custom-designed and calibrated fluorometer. As reported before,[31] the sample was added in a disposable cartridge and
excited by a continuous wave semiconductor laser (wavelength of 488
nm). The collected fluorescence signal was analyzed by a portable
spectrometer (USB 2000+, Ocean Optics).
TEM Characterization
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL 2010) with a point resolution
of 0.23 nm was used to characterize the samples. The supernatant
containing magnetic beads was deposited onto a carbon-coated copper
grid and left to evaporate. The TEM images were then captured through
an AMT XR81 bottom mount camera with a 60 kV electron microscope.
Authors: Marcelo F C Gomes; Ana Pastore Y Piontti; Luca Rossi; Dennis Chao; Ira Longini; M Elizabeth Halloran; Alessandro Vespignani Journal: PLoS Curr Date: 2014-09-02
Authors: Sergey Shmakov; Omar O Abudayyeh; Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Ekaterina Semenova; Leonid Minakhin; Julia Joung; Silvana Konermann; Konstantin Severinov; Feng Zhang; Eugene V Koonin Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Sun Young Cho; Ji-Man Kang; Young Eun Ha; Ga Eun Park; Ji Yeon Lee; Jae-Hoon Ko; Ji Yong Lee; Jong Min Kim; Cheol-In Kang; Ik Joon Jo; Jae Geum Ryu; Jong Rim Choi; Seonwoo Kim; Hee Jae Huh; Chang-Seok Ki; Eun-Suk Kang; Kyong Ran Peck; Hun-Jong Dhong; Jae-Hoon Song; Doo Ryeon Chung; Yae-Jean Kim Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gopikrishnan Gopalakrishnan Meena; Joel G Wright; Aaron R Hawkins; Holger Schmidt Journal: IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 4.653