Literature DB >> 32886279

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan as condition for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: comparison between combinations with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine.

Taku Kikuchi1, Takehiko Mori2, Chikako Ohwada3,4, Masahiro Onoda5, Hiroaki Shimizu6, Hiroki Yokoyama7, Makoto Onizuka8, Yuya Koda2, Jun Kato2, Yusuke Takeda3, Yutaro Hino3, Tatsuzo Mishina3, Emiko Sakaida3, Katsuhiro Shono5, Yuhei Nagao5, Akira Yokota5, Kana Matsumoto9, Kunihiko Morita9, Shinichiro Okamoto2.   

Abstract

Busulfan (Bu) has been used in combination with fludarabine (Flu; BuFlu) or cyclophosphamide (Cy; BuCy) as conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This multi-institutional prospective study compared pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of Bu between BuFlu and BuCy. Plasma Bu concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography at the first dose of the first and fourth days of intravenous Bu administrations (total of 16 doses of 0.8 mg/kg). Thirty-seven patients were evaluable (BuFlu, N = 18; BuCy, N = 19). The median age was significantly higher in BuFlu. In BuFlu, the median area under the blood concentration-time curve of Bu on the fourth day was 1183 μmol min/L (range 808-1509), which was significantly higher than that on the first day [1095 μmol min/L (range 822-1453), P < 0.01]. In contrast, such differences were not observed in BuCy. Consistently, there was a significant decrease in the clearance of Bu on the fourth day as compared with the first day in BuFlu. These results suggest that the PK of Bu was altered during the co-administration of Flu, which was not the case with Cy. A large-scale study is required to evaluate the significance of the differences in the PK of Bu between the conditionings on HSCT outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation; Busulfan; Pharmacokinetics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32886279     DOI: 10.1007/s12185-020-02990-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  4 in total

1.  Morbidity and non-relapse mortality after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in adult leukemia patients conditioned with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide: a retrospective comparison of oral versus intravenous busulfan.

Authors:  So-Eun Kim; Je-Hwan Lee; Seong-Jun Choi; Jung-Hee Lee; Seong-Gil Ryu; Kyoo-Hyung Lee
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Cancer pharmacology in the elderly.

Authors:  M J Egorin
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of oral busulfan during pretransplant conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Francine Attié de Castro; Vera Lucia Lanchote; Julio Cesar Voltarelli; Virgílio Antônio Rensi Colturato; Belinda Pinto Simões
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Graft-rejection and toxicity following bone marrow transplantation in relation to busulfan pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J T Slattery; J E Sanders; C D Buckner; R L Schaffer; K W Lambert; F P Langer; C Anasetti; W I Bensinger; L D Fisher; F R Appelbaum
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.483

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Impact of busulfan pharmacokinetics on outcome in adult patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Claire Seydoux; Raphael Battegay; Joerg Halter; Dominik Heim; Katharina M Rentsch; Jakob R Passweg; Michael Medinger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.174

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.