| Literature DB >> 32886117 |
Alex R Chang1,2, G Craig Wood3, Xin Chu3, Aditya Surapaneni4, Morgan E Grams4,5.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32886117 PMCID: PMC7489865 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14670
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA Netw Open ISSN: 2574-3805
Characteristics and Differences in Rate of eGFR Decline Between Individuals Who Underwent Bariatric Surgery and Those Who Did Not
| Characteristics | Individuals, No. (%) | Difference (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery (n = 144) | No surgery (n = 144) | |||
| Age, mean (SD), y | 47.9 (10.2) | 48.5 (10.7) | NC | .62 |
| Women | 126 (87.5) | 126 (87.5) | NC | >.99 |
| Black race | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.7) | NC | >.99 |
| Weight, mean (SD), kg | 126.2 (22.1) | 118.6 (19.3) | NC | .002 |
| BMI, mean (SD) | 46.2 (6.4) | 44.1 (6.1) | NC | .01 |
| Hypertension | 74 (51.4) | 71 (49.3) | NC | .72 |
| Diabetes | 59 (41.0) | 59 (41.0) | NC | >.99 |
| eGFRcr-cyc, mean (SD), mL/min/1.73 m2 | 82.6 (19.9) | 82.6 (18.2) | NC | >.99 |
| Time from baseline to follow-up serum samples, median (IQR), y | 9.17 (8.12 to 9.96) | 8.20 (7.46 to 8.80) | NC | <.001 |
| Weight change from baseline to follow-up, median (IQR), kg | –27.5 (–37.9 to –19.9) | –1.7 (–9.1 to 7.6) | NC | <.001 |
| Rate of eGFR decline, mL/min/1.73 m2/y, mean (95% CI) | ||||
| eGFRcr-cyc | –0.41 (–0.74 to –0.08) | –1.44 (–1.76 to –1.11) | 1.02 (0.56 to 1.49) | <.001 |
| eGFRcr | –0.86 (–1.16 to –0.56) | –1.49 (–1.84 to –1.15) | 0.63 (0.17 to 1.08) | .01 |
| eGFRcyc | –0.06 (–0.41 to 0.29) | –1.40 (–1.73 to –1.07) | 1.34 (0.85 to 1.82) | <.001 |
| eGFRβ2m | –0.18 (–0.43 to 0.06) | –0.79 (–1.02 to –0.57) | 0.60 (0.26 to 0.94) | .001 |
| eGFRβTP | –0.18 (–0.41 to 0.05) | –0.97 (–1.19 to –0.76) | 0.79 (0.47 to 1.10) | <.001 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); βTP, β-trace protein; β2m, β-2 microglobulin; cr, creatinine; cyc, cystatin C; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range; NC, not calculated.
Calculated using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology equations.
Figure. Rates of Kidney Function Decline Stratified by Baseline Kidney Function