Literature DB >> 32885663

One Piece of the Jigsaw for the Cancer Recovery Strategy: Prevalence of COVID-19 in Patients With Cancer.

Charlotte Moss1, Saoirse Dolly2, Beth Russell1, Mary Lei2, Sharmista Ghosh2, Sophie Papa2,3, Richard Sullivan3, Mieke Van Hemelrijck1, Anne Rigg2.   

Abstract

COVID-19 has forced governments to make drastic changes to healthcare systems. To start making informed decisions about cancer care, we need to understand the scale of COVID-19 infection. Therefore, we introduced swab testing for patients visiting Guy's Cancer Centre. Our Centre is one of the largest UK Cancer Centers at the epicenter of the UK COVID-19 epidemic. The first COVID-19 positive cancer patient was reported on 29 February 2020. We analyzed data from 7-15 May 2020 for COVID-19 tests in our cancer patients. 2,647 patients attended for outpatient, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy appointments. 654 were swabbed for COVID-19 (25%). Of those tested, 9 were positive for COVID-19 (1.38%) of which 7 were asymptomatic. Cancer service providers will need to understand their local cancer population prevalence. The absolute priority is that cancer patients have the confidence to attend hospitals and be reassured that they will be treated in a COVID-19 managed environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; UK; cancer recovery; prevalence; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32885663      PMCID: PMC7658857          DOI: 10.1177/1073274820950844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Control        ISSN: 1073-2748            Impact factor:   3.302


The COVID-19 pandemic has forced governments, including our own, to make drastic changes to the healthcare system to save lives. While such measures may have reduced COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, there have been serious unintended consequences on society and non-COVID-19 health issues. Well-established pathways to ensure patients with cancer are diagnosed, obtain rapid treatment, and receive ongoing care have been significantly disrupted.[1] This disruption is multifactorial: strong messaging to “stay at home” has been so successful that patients are frightened to attend appointments; there is little scientific literature as yet to guide clinicians about safety of cancer treatments during the pandemic; the clinical workforce has been reduced by COVID-19 illness and redeployment as well as fear about their risk exposures; and the availability and reliability of COVID-19 antigen and antibody testing remains fragmented. Currently, as cancer clinicians and academics, we are deeply concerned about the low numbers of patients presenting either to their GP or hospital services with signs and symptoms suspicious of cancer. Since the UK is emerging from the pandemic’s first peak, cancer recovery strategies are being developed at local/national levels to address associated delayed diagnoses and treatments.[1,2] However, the COVID-19 threat has not disappeared and the challenge is not just to deal with a backlog of work, but to continue to practice in a way that minimizes COVID-19 transmission. In the absence of a vaccine, it is likely that COVID-19-protected cancer pathways will be needed for months, if not years. Although questions remain about the wider consequences of a “semi-lockdown” strategy on welfare. Recently, several case series have been published including a Consortium of 900 cancer patients with COVID-19 from >85 institutions.[3] Although these initial data start to inform us how to care for cancer patients during COVID-19, there is as yet no long-term follow-up. To start making informed decisions about cancer care, it is crucial to understand the scale of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients. Therefore, we introduced swab testing for patients visiting Guy’s Cancer Centre. Our Centre in South-East London treats approximately 8,800 patients annually (including 4,500 new diagnoses) and is one of the largest Comprehensive Cancer Centers in the UK at the epicenter of the UK COVID-19 epidemic. The first COVID-19 positive cancer patient was reported on 29 February 2020. Until 30 April 2020, a COVID-19 swab was ordered for cancer patients with symptoms necessitating hospitalization or if they were scheduled to undergo a cancer-related treatment. From 1 May 2020, COVID-19 testing was introduced as standard of care, with about 25% of patients being swabbed daily depending upon staff and testing kit availability. An analysis of the first 156 COVID-19 positive cancer patients (29th February until 12th May 2020) at our Centre has been published elsewhere and focuses specifically on the cancer patient characteristics indicative of COVID-19 severity and death.[4] Here, we analyzed data from 7-15 May 2020 (i.e. 6 consecutive work days) for COVID-19 test results in all cancer patients at our Centre. All data was collected and analyzed as part of Guy’s Cancer Cohort (Ethics Reference number: 18/NW/0297).[5] 2,647 patients attended for outpatient, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy appointments from across South East London (and England) (Figure 1). Of these, 654 were swabbed for COVID-19 (25%). Over 57% of patients filled out a symptom assessment form which 97% were asymptomatic. Based on their demographics and tumor characteristics, this sample can be considered to be representative of the total population (Table 1). Of the patients tested, 9 were positive for COVID-19 (1.38%) of which 7 were asymptomatic. Reassuringly, patients with multiple attendances for radiotherapy or anti-cancer treatment were not at higher risk of infection.
Figure 1.

Overview of patients visiting Guy’s Cancer Centre between 7-15 May 2020.

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics of Cancer Patients Visiting Guy’s Cancer Centre From 7-15 May 2020.

Cancer patients attending cancer center (N = 2647)Cancer patients tested (N = 654)COVID-19 positive cancer patients (N = 9)
Median Age (Q1-Q3)61.90 (53.10-71.10)62.00 (53.10-70.50)53.70 (39.30-60.20)
Sex
 Male1221 (46.10)270 (41.30)6 (66.70)
 Female1426 (53.90)384 (58.7)3 (33.30)
Tumor type
 Breast454 (17.20)131 (20.00)1 (11.10)
 Urology356 (13.40)77 (11.80)1 (11.10)
 Head and Neck114 (4.30)26 (3.90)0 (0.00)
 Gastro-Intestinal517 (19.50)137 (21.00)2 (22.20)
 Lung294 (11.10)78 (11.90)1 (11.10)
 Gynecology299 (11.30)73 (11.20)0 (0.00)
 Hematology225 (8.50)40 (6.12)0 (0.00)
Other388 (14.70)92 (14.10)4 (44.40)
 Appointment type
 Chemotherapy511 (19.30)152 (23.20)2 (22.20)
 Radiotherapy533 (20.10)94 (14.40)1 (1.10)
 Outpatients1603 (60.60)408 (62.39)6 (66.67)
Ethnicity
 White1232 (46.50)293 (44.80)2 (22.20)
 Black346 (13.10)65 (9.90)2 (22.20)
 Asian70 (2.60)16 (2.50)0 (0.00)
 Mixed33 (1.20)5 (0.80)0 (0.00)
 Other50 (1.50)6 (0.90)0 (0.00)
 Missing926 (35.00)269 (41.10)5 (55.60)
SES
 Low2265 (85.50)570 (87.20)7 (77.80)
 Middle48 (1.80)8 (1.20)0 (0.00)
 High182 (6.90)37 (5.70)1 (11.10)
 Missing148 (5.60)39 (6.00)1 (11.10)
Overview of patients visiting Guy’s Cancer Centre between 7-15 May 2020. Descriptive Statistics of Cancer Patients Visiting Guy’s Cancer Centre From 7-15 May 2020. An awareness of the COVID-19 prevalence in asymptomatic cancer patients, while helpful, is only one aspect necessary to develop a successful cancer recovery strategy. It will be essential to understand and manage contamination of the physical environment, ensure ongoing availability and use of personal protective equipment plus viral antigen and antibody testing. Moreover, knowledge of COVID-19 status during cancer treatment can allow clinicians to make tailored decisions about timing and type of therapy. All asymptomatic COVID-19 positive patients had a conversation with their treating clinician about impact on their care. Based on data from the Office for National Statistics, between 28 April-10 May 2020 an average of 0.27% of the community population had COVID-19 (95%CI: 0.17-0.41). However, for those working in patient-facing healthcare or resident-facing social care roles, this was estimated at 1.33% (95CI%: 0.39-3.28).[6] Nevertheless, London has been the region hardest hit by COVID-19, so the rate of 1.38% among asymptomatic cancer patients, the majority of whom will have been shielding, is likely to be more representative of the local situation. A meta-analysis of prevalence studies in China recently reported a prevalence of COVID-19 of 2.59% (95% CI, 1.72% to 3.90%) in the cancer population.[7] This number is 1.9 times higher than ours, and may be a reflection of differences in lock-down strategies and timings of the pandemic. In addition, it needs to be noted that there may be variability in the accuracy of RT-PCR testing for COVID-19 as the sensitivity may vary by type of specimen.[8] However, this “snapshot” of prevalence is not enough for an evolving situation. To our knowledge most studies to date focus on the prevalence of cancer in the COVID-19 positive patients rather than the prevalence of COVID-19 in the cancer population. Currently, in our Cancer Centre we have discontinued routine testing due to the very low prevalence of COVID-19 in asymptomatic cancer patients. We continue to screen patients closely for symptoms and have low threshold for PCR and antibody testing to ensure maintenance of a COVID-19 minimal Centre. We are closely monitoring the number of local cases and would re-implement routine swabbing in the event of a surge in COVID-19 positive infections. Cancer service providers will need to understand their local cancer population prevalence and keep this under regular review.[9] The absolute priority and need of the hour is that cancer patients have the confidence to attend hospitals and be reassured that they will be treated in a COVID-19 managed environment.
  7 in total

1.  Interpreting a covid-19 test result.

Authors:  Jessica Watson; Penny F Whiting; John E Brush
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-05-12

2.  Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; Toni K Choueiri; Dimpy P Shah; Yu Shyr; Samuel M Rubinstein; Donna R Rivera; Sanjay Shete; Chih-Yuan Hsu; Aakash Desai; Gilberto de Lima Lopes; Petros Grivas; Corrie A Painter; Solange Peters; Michael A Thompson; Ziad Bakouny; Gerald Batist; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Mehmet A Bilen; Nathaniel Bouganim; Mateo Bover Larroya; Daniel Castellano; Salvatore A Del Prete; Deborah B Doroshow; Pamela C Egan; Arielle Elkrief; Dimitrios Farmakiotis; Daniel Flora; Matthew D Galsky; Michael J Glover; Elizabeth A Griffiths; Anthony P Gulati; Shilpa Gupta; Navid Hafez; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jessica E Hawley; Emily Hsu; Anup Kasi; Ali R Khaki; Christopher A Lemmon; Colleen Lewis; Barbara Logan; Tyler Masters; Rana R McKay; Ruben A Mesa; Alicia K Morgans; Mary F Mulcahy; Orestis A Panagiotou; Prakash Peddi; Nathan A Pennell; Kerry Reynolds; Lane R Rosen; Rachel Rosovsky; Mary Salazar; Andrew Schmidt; Sumit A Shah; Justin A Shaya; John Steinharter; Keith E Stockerl-Goldstein; Suki Subbiah; Donald C Vinh; Firas H Wehbe; Lisa B Weissmann; Julie Tsu-Yu Wu; Elizabeth Wulff-Burchfield; Zhuoer Xie; Albert Yeh; Peter P Yu; Alice Y Zhou; Leyre Zubiri; Sanjay Mishra; Gary H Lyman; Brian I Rini; Jeremy L Warner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19.

Authors:  Zhiru Gao; Yinghui Xu; Chao Sun; Xu Wang; Ye Guo; Shi Qiu; Kewei Ma
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.399

4.  Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Guy's cancer cohort - real world evidence for cancer pathways.

Authors:  C Moss; A Haire; F Cahill; D Enting; S Hughes; D Smith; E Sawyer; A Davies; J Zylstra; K Haire; A Rigg; M Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Cancer, COVID-19 and the precautionary principle: prioritizing treatment during a global pandemic.

Authors:  Timothy P Hanna; Gerald A Evans; Christopher M Booth
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 66.675

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  COVID-19 Infections in Cancer Patients Were Frequently Asymptomatic: Description From a French Prospective Multicenter Cohort (PAPESCO-19).

Authors:  Ke Zhou; Jean-Luc Raoul; Audrey Blanc-Lapierre; Valérie Seegers; Michèle Boisdron-Celle; Marianne Bourdon; Hakim Mahammedi; Aurélien Lambert; Camille Moreau-Bachelard; Mario Campone; Thierry Conroy; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Martine M Bellanger; Frédéric Bigot
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2022-04-18

2.  Important updates from the AACR virtual meeting: COVID-19 and cancer.

Authors:  Jacob Ripp; Anup Kasi
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-09-18

3.  Prevalence of COVID-19 Infection in Asymptomatic Cancer Patients in a District With High Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Italy.

Authors:  Luigi Cavanna; Chiara Citterio; Camilla Di Nunzio; Claudia Biasini; Maria Angela Palladino; Massimo Ambroggi; Serena Madaro; Livia Bidin; Rosa Porzio; Manuela Proietto
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  COVID-19 Risk Factors for Cancer Patients: A First Report with Comparator Data from COVID-19 Negative Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Beth Russell; Charlotte L Moss; Kieran Palmer; Rushan Sylva; Andrea D'Souza; Harriet Wylie; Anna Haire; Fidelma Cahill; Renee Steel; Angela Hoyes; Isabelle Wilson; Alyson Macneil; Belul Shifa; Maria J Monroy-Iglesias; Sophie Papa; Sheeba Irshad; Paul Ross; James Spicer; Shahram Kordasti; Danielle Crawley; Kamarul Zaki; Ailsa Sita-Lumsden; Debra Josephs; Deborah Enting; Angela Swampillai; Elinor Sawyer; Paul Fields; David Wrench; Anne Rigg; Richard Sullivan; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Saoirse Dolly
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.