Literature DB >> 32885509

Reliability of pelvimetry is affected by observer experience but not by breed and sex: A cross-sectional study in beef cattle.

Johannes Vernooij1, Florine de Munck1, Evelien van Nieuwenhuizen1, Edward Webb2, Herman Jonker1, Peter Vos1, Dietmar Holm3.   

Abstract

Pelvis size plays an important role to prevent dystocia in cattle caused by the foeto-maternal disproportion in commonly primiparous females. The reproducibility and repeatability are two important aspects for the reliability of the measurements to use in the selection of cattle for culling. Pelvic measures were taken with a Rice pelvimeter from 224 young cattle (180 females and 44 males) of four beef breeds in South Africa. One experienced and two inexperienced observers each measured pelvic height and width twice. The proportion measurements with a maximum difference of 0.5 cm within animal compared with the first measurement by the experienced observer are around 80% and by the inexperienced observers around 50% for pelvic height and around 60% for pelvic width. Breed and sex do not affect the reliability of pelvimetry by an experienced observer. Under- and overestimation of pelvis size were observed in inexperienced observers, which seems to be unrelated to breed and sex.
© 2020 The Authors. Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; experience; observer variability; pelvimetry; probit model

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32885509      PMCID: PMC7756854          DOI: 10.1111/rda.13814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim        ISSN: 0936-6768            Impact factor:   2.005


  8 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Clinical utility of calf front hoof circumference and maternal intrapelvic area in predicting dystocia in 103 late gestation Holstein-Friesian heifers and cows.

Authors:  Mark W H Hiew; Ameer A Megahed; Jonathan R Townsend; Wayne L Singleton; Peter D Constable
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  The predictive value of pelvimetry in beef cattle.

Authors:  J Van Donkersgoed; C S Ribble; C W Booker; D McCartney; E D Janzen
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  The impact of dystocia on dairy calf health, welfare, performance and survival.

Authors:  A C Barrier; M J Haskell; S Birch; A Bagnall; D J Bell; J Dickinson; A I Macrae; C M Dwyer
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  The usefulness of pelvic area measurements as an on-farm test for predicting calving difficulty in beef heifers.

Authors:  J Van Donkersgoed; C S Ribble; H G Townsend; E D Janzen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 6.  Prevalence and risk factors for dystocia in dairy cattle: a review.

Authors:  J F Mee
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.688

7.  A new application of pelvis area data as culling tool to aid in the management of dystocia in heifers.

Authors:  D E Holm; E C Webb; P N Thompson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Reliability of pelvimetry is affected by observer experience but not by breed and sex: A cross-sectional study in beef cattle.

Authors:  Johannes Vernooij; Florine de Munck; Evelien van Nieuwenhuizen; Edward Webb; Herman Jonker; Peter Vos; Dietmar Holm
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.005

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reliability of pelvimetry is affected by observer experience but not by breed and sex: A cross-sectional study in beef cattle.

Authors:  Johannes Vernooij; Florine de Munck; Evelien van Nieuwenhuizen; Edward Webb; Herman Jonker; Peter Vos; Dietmar Holm
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.005

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.