H C Melissant1,2,3, F Jansen4,5,6, S E Eerenstein1, P Cuijpers3, E Laan7, B I Lissenberg-Witte8, A S Schuit3, K A Sherman9, C R Leemans1, I M Verdonck-de Leeuw1,2,3. 1. Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands. 2. Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands. f.jansen1@amsterdamumc.nl. 5. Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.jansen1@amsterdamumc.nl. 6. Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.jansen1@amsterdamumc.nl. 7. Department of Sexology and Psychosomatic OBGYN, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 9. Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to investigate the prevalence of body image distress among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients after treatment and to examine its association with sociodemographic and clinical factors, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), HNC symptoms, sexuality, self-compassion, and psychological distress. Second, we aim to explore daily life experiences of HNC patients regarding body image. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey among HNC patients investigated the prevalence of body image distress based on the Body Image Scale. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to study associations with sociodemographic and clinical factors, HRQOL (EORTC QLQ-C30), HNC symptoms (QLQ-HN43), sexuality (FSFI-6; IIEF-5), self-compassion (SCS-SF), and psychological distress (HADS). Qualitative data from a body image writing intervention was used to explore experiences in daily life related to body image. RESULTS: Body image distress was prevalent in 13-20% (depending on cut-off scores) of 233 HNC patients. Symptoms of depression (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), problems with social contact (p = 0.001), problems with wound healing (p = 0.013), and larger extent of surgery (p = 0.014) were associated with having body image distress. This model explained 67% of variance. Writing interventions of 40 HNC patients showed that negative body image experiences were related to appearance and function, with social functioning problems described most often. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of body image distress in HNC patients, using different cut-off scores, is 13-20%. Younger patients, patients after extensive surgery, and patients who had wound healing problems are most at risk. There is a significant association between body image distress and depressive symptoms and social functioning.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to investigate the prevalence of body image distress among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients after treatment and to examine its association with sociodemographic and clinical factors, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), HNC symptoms, sexuality, self-compassion, and psychological distress. Second, we aim to explore daily life experiences of HNC patients regarding body image. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey among HNC patients investigated the prevalence of body image distress based on the Body Image Scale. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to study associations with sociodemographic and clinical factors, HRQOL (EORTC QLQ-C30), HNC symptoms (QLQ-HN43), sexuality (FSFI-6; IIEF-5), self-compassion (SCS-SF), and psychological distress (HADS). Qualitative data from a body image writing intervention was used to explore experiences in daily life related to body image. RESULTS: Body image distress was prevalent in 13-20% (depending on cut-off scores) of 233 HNC patients. Symptoms of depression (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), problems with social contact (p = 0.001), problems with wound healing (p = 0.013), and larger extent of surgery (p = 0.014) were associated with having body image distress. This model explained 67% of variance. Writing interventions of 40 HNC patients showed that negative body image experiences were related to appearance and function, with social functioning problems described most often. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of body image distress in HNC patients, using different cut-off scores, is 13-20%. Younger patients, patients after extensive surgery, and patients who had wound healing problems are most at risk. There is a significant association between body image distress and depressive symptoms and social functioning.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body image; Depression; Head and neck cancer; Health-related quality of life; Prevalence; Psychological distress
Authors: Christian A Falk Dahl; Kristin V Reinertsen; Inger-Lise Nesvold; Sophie D Fosså; Alv A Dahl Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: I M Verdonck-de Leeuw; F Jansen; R H Brakenhoff; J A Langendijk; R Takes; C H J Terhaard; R J Baatenburg de Jong; J H Smit; C R Leemans Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Maria Cherba; Boris H J M Brummans; Michael P Hier; Lauriane Giguère; Gabrielle Chartier; Hannah Jacobs; Véronique-Isabelle Forest; Alex Mlynarek; Khalil Sultanem; Melissa Henry Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Anthony D Nehlsen; Kunal K Sindhu; Brianna M Jones; Eric J Lehrer; Jared P Rowley; Richard L Bakst Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Melissa Henry; Justine G Albert; Saul Frenkiel; Michael Hier; Anthony Zeitouni; Karen Kost; Alex Mlynarek; Martin Black; Christina MacDonald; Keith Richardson; Marco Mascarella; Gregoire B Morand; Gabrielle Chartier; Nader Sadeghi; Christopher Lo; Zeev Rosberger Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-03-24
Authors: Justine G Albert; Christopher Lo; Zeev Rosberger; Saul Frenkiel; Michael Hier; Anthony Zeitouni; Karen Kost; Alex Mlynarek; Martin Black; Christina MacDonald; Keith Richardson; Marco Mascarella; Gregoire B Morand; Gabrielle Chartier; Nader Sadeghi; Khalil Sultanem; George Shenouda; Fabio L Cury; Melissa Henry Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: David Macias; Brittany N Hand; Patrik Pipkorn; Amy M Williams; Steven S Chang; Joseph Zenga; Marci L Nilsen; Bethany A Rhoten; Andrew T Huang; Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters; Stacey Maurer; Wendy Balliet; Hong Li; Kenneth J Ruggiero; Katherine R Sterba; Evan M Graboyes Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-12-10
Authors: Heleen C Melissant; Femke Jansen; Simone E J Eerenstein; Pim Cuijpers; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Kerry A Sherman; Ellen T M Laan; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 3.603