| Literature DB >> 32884558 |
Haiyue Tian1, Baicheng Xu2, Xinlan Wang1, Jinyan Wang3, Cuiping Zhong1.
Abstract
To investigate the correlation between environmental-meteorological factors and daily visits for acute otitis media (AOM) in Lanzhou, China.Entities:
Keywords: Acute otitis media; Air pollution and meteolofical factors; Exposure-response curve; Non-parametric generalized additive model; Relative risk
Year: 2020 PMID: 32884558 PMCID: PMC7451727 DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2020.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Otol ISSN: 1672-2930
Fig. 1Age distribution of AOM in Lanzhou from 2014 through 2016.
Fig. 2Age distribution of AOM under 10 years old in Lanzhou from 2014 through 2016.
Fig. 3Monthly AOM visits during 2014–2016 period in Lanzhou.
Fig. 4Monthly average AQI of Lanzhou during 2014 through 2016.
Spearman analysis of single lag effects on daily AOM visits by air pollutes and meteorological factors.
| Factors | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQI | 0.154∗∗ | 0.170∗∗ | 0.204∗∗ | 0.238∗∗ | 0.221∗∗ | 0.233∗∗ |
| CO | 0.150∗∗ | 0.154∗∗ | 0.185∗∗ | 0.169∗∗ | 0.170∗∗ | 0.180∗∗ |
| NO2 | 0.150∗∗ | 0.167∗∗ | 0.244∗∗ | 0.204∗∗ | 0.218∗∗ | 0.236∗∗ |
| O3 | −0.061∗ | −0.066∗ | −0.071∗ | −0.067∗ | −0.062∗ | −0.067∗ |
| PM2.5 | 0.177∗∗ | 0.196∗∗ | 0.204∗∗ | 0.244∗∗ | 0.226∗∗ | 0.241∗∗ |
| PM10 | 0.163∗∗ | 0.179∗∗ | 0.236∗∗ | 0.217∗∗ | 0.224∗∗ | 0.232∗∗ |
| SO2 | 0.111∗∗ | 0.112∗∗ | 0.118∗∗ | 0.116∗∗ | 0.110∗∗ | 0.112∗∗ |
| W | −0.018 | −0.023 | −0.017 | −0.031 | −0.023 | −0.037 |
| AP | 0.088∗∗ | 0.095∗∗ | 0.119∗∗ | 0.108∗∗ | 0.098∗∗ | 0.114∗∗ |
| RH | −0.069∗ | −0.072∗ | −0.091∗ | −0.081∗∗ | −0.083∗∗ | −0.088∗∗ |
| T | −0.080∗∗ | −0.082∗∗ | −0.097∗∗ | −0.089∗∗ | −0.094∗∗ | −0.096∗∗ |
∗P < 0.05 ∗∗P < 0.01.
Spearman analysis of cumulative lag effects on AOM by air pollutes and meteorological factors.
| Factors | L01 | L02 | L03 | L04 | L05 | LO6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQI | 0.154∗∗ | 0.170∗∗ | 0.233∗∗ | 0.208∗∗ | 0.221∗∗ | 0.204∗∗ |
| CO | 0.140∗∗ | 0.154∗∗ | 0.180∗∗ | 0.169∗∗ | 0.170∗∗ | 0.155∗∗ |
| NO2 | 0.150∗∗ | 0.167∗∗ | 0.184∗∗ | 0.236∗∗ | 0.218∗∗ | 0.206∗∗ |
| O3 | −0.071∗ | −0.071∗ | −0.069∗ | −0.067∗ | −0.062∗ | −0.067∗ |
| PM2.5 | 0.177∗∗ | 0.196∗∗ | 0.244∗∗ | 0.224∗∗ | 0.226∗∗ | 0.221∗∗ |
| PM10 | 0.163∗∗ | 0.179∗∗ | 0.236∗∗ | 0.217∗∗ | 0.224∗∗ | 0.218∗∗ |
| SO2 | 0.111∗∗ | 0.112∗∗ | 0.113∗∗ | 0.116∗∗ | 0.110∗∗ | 0.112∗∗ |
| W | −0.060 | −0.058 | −0.074 | −0.089 | −0.114 | −0.124 |
| AP | 0.124∗∗ | 0.122∗∗ | 0.133∗∗ | 0.129∗∗ | 0.107∗∗ | 0.130∗∗ |
| RH | −0.045∗ | −0.043∗ | −0.056∗ | −0.050∗ | −0.052∗ | −0.055∗ |
| T | −0.239∗∗ | −0.241∗∗ | −0.247∗∗ | −0.241∗∗ | −0.239∗∗ | −0.241∗∗ |
∗P < 0.05 ∗∗P < 0.01.
RR for single lag effects on AOM visits.
| L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQI | 1.002 | 1.002 | 1.003 | 1.002 | 1.002 | 1.002 |
| PM2.5 | 1.005 | 1.006 | 1.007 | 1.006 | 1.006 | 1.006 |
| PM10 | 1.001 | 1.001 | 1.002 | 1.001 | 1.001 | 1.001 |
| NO2 | 1.007∗ | 1.008∗ | 1.009∗ | 1.009∗ | 1.007∗ | 1.009∗ |
| SO2 | 1.009∗∗ | 1.008∗ | 1.010∗∗ | 1.010∗ | 1.009∗ | 1.008∗ |
| CO | 1.275∗ | 1.270∗ | 1.282∗ | 1.293∗ | 1.270∗ | 1.288∗ |
| O3 | 0.994 | 0.994∗ | 0.995∗∗ | 0.994 | 0.994 | 0.992 |
| RH | 0.999∗ | 1.000∗∗ | 0.982∗ | 0.982∗ | 0.981 | 0.981 |
| T | 0.981 | 0.982 | 0.995∗ | 0.995 | 0.993 | 0.993 |
| W | 0.998 | 0.998 | 1.000 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
| AP | 1.019∗ | 1.016∗ | 1.015∗ | 1.017∗∗ | 1.022 | 1.022 |
Significance codes:∗∗∗P = 0,∗∗P < 0.001,∗P < 0.01.
RR for cumulative lag effects on AOM visits.
| L01 | L02 | L03 | L04 | L05 | L06 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQI | 1.002 | 1.003 | 1.007 | 1.005 | 1.005 | 1.006 |
| PM2.5 | 1.007 | 1.009 | 1.014 | 1.011 | 1.012 | 1.013 |
| PM10 | 1.001 | 1.002 | 1.002 | 1.004 | 1.003 | 1.003 |
| NO2 | 1.009∗ | 1.010∗ | 1.016∗ | 1.013∗ | 1.014∗ | 1.015∗ |
| SO2 | 1.010∗ | 1.011∗∗ | 1.015∗ | 1.012∗∗ | 1.012∗ | 1.012∗ |
| CO | 1.297∗∗ | 1.333∗ | 1.433∗ | 1.387∗ | 1.270∗ | 1.422∗ |
| O3 | 0.993 | 0.993∗∗ | 0.993∗ | 0.992 | 0.993∗ | 0.992 |
| RH | 0.999∗ | 0.999∗ | 0.999∗ | 0.999∗ | 0.999∗ | 0.999∗ |
| T | 0.981∗ | 0.981∗ | 0.981∗ | 0.981∗ | 0.981∗ | 0.981∗ |
| W | 0.987 | 0.985 | 0.844 | 0.976 | 0.756 | 0.969 |
| AP | 1.031∗ | 1.035∗∗ | 1.030∗ | 1.040∗∗ | 1.032∗ | 1.044∗ |
Significance codes:∗∗∗P = 0,∗∗P < 0.001,∗P < 0.01.
Fig. 5Exposure-response curves of single lag effects.
Fig. 6Exposure-response curves of cumulative lag effects.