Søren Krogh1,2, Anette B Jønsson3,4, Jørgen Vibjerg3, Kaare Severinsen3, Per Aagaard5, Helge Kasch3,4. 1. Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark, Regional Hospital Viborg, Viborg, Denmark. sokrje@rm.dk. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. sokrje@rm.dk. 3. Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark, Regional Hospital Viborg, Viborg, Denmark. 4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 5. Department of Sports Science & Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Blood flow-restricted exercise (BFRE) appears to hold considerable potential in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation, due to its ability to induce beneficial functional changes and morphological alterations from low-intensity, low-load exercise. However, it remains unclear if this training approach is feasible and safe in individuals with autonomic dysreflexia (AD). CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old male with traumatic, cervical (C6), motor-complete (AIS: B) SCI and diagnosed AD completed eight sessions of BFRE for the upper extremities over 4 weeks. Blood pressure and heart rate recordings and perceptual pain responses were collected repeatedly during exercise. Blood samples were drawn pre- and post-training. Training was carried out in a neurorehabilitation hospital setting with appertaining medical staff readiness, and was supervised by a physiotherapist with expertise in AD in general as well as prior knowledge of the present patient's triggers and symptoms. Four incidences of AD (defined as systolic blood pressure increase >20 mmHg) were recorded across all training sessions, of which one was symptomatic. The patient's blood profile did not change considerably from pre- to post-training sessions. Self-reported average pain during training corresponded from "mild" to "moderate". DISCUSSION: The patient was able to perform 4 weeks of BFRE, but encountered episodes of AD. Similarly, two AD episodes were registered during a single conventional, free-flow resistance training session. Evidence from clinically controlled safety studies is needed in order to establish if and how BFRE can be applied in a rehabilitation strategy in SCI individuals with neurological level of injury at or above T6 level.
INTRODUCTION: Blood flow-restricted exercise (BFRE) appears to hold considerable potential in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation, due to its ability to induce beneficial functional changes and morphological alterations from low-intensity, low-load exercise. However, it remains unclear if this training approach is feasible and safe in individuals with autonomic dysreflexia (AD). CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old male with traumatic, cervical (C6), motor-complete (AIS: B) SCI and diagnosed AD completed eight sessions of BFRE for the upper extremities over 4 weeks. Blood pressure and heart rate recordings and perceptual pain responses were collected repeatedly during exercise. Blood samples were drawn pre- and post-training. Training was carried out in a neurorehabilitation hospital setting with appertaining medical staff readiness, and was supervised by a physiotherapist with expertise in AD in general as well as prior knowledge of the present patient's triggers and symptoms. Four incidences of AD (defined as systolic blood pressure increase >20 mmHg) were recorded across all training sessions, of which one was symptomatic. The patient's blood profile did not change considerably from pre- to post-training sessions. Self-reported average pain during training corresponded from "mild" to "moderate". DISCUSSION: The patient was able to perform 4 weeks of BFRE, but encountered episodes of AD. Similarly, two AD episodes were registered during a single conventional, free-flow resistance training session. Evidence from clinically controlled safety studies is needed in order to establish if and how BFRE can be applied in a rehabilitation strategy in SCI individuals with neurological level of injury at or above T6 level.
Authors: Ashraf S Gorgey; Mark K Timmons; David R Dolbow; Justin Bengel; Kendall C Fugate-Laus; Lori A Michener; David R Gater Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: B C Clark; T M Manini; R L Hoffman; P S Williams; M K Guiler; M J Knutson; M L McGlynn; M R Kushnick Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Anne M Boonstra; Roy E Stewart; Albère J A Köke; René F A Oosterwijk; Jeannette L Swaan; Karlein M G Schreurs; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2016-09-30