| Literature DB >> 32883699 |
Hisanori Kobara1, Tsutomu Miyamoto2, Hirofumi Ando1, Ryoichi Asaka1, Akiko Takatsu1, Ayumi Ohya3, Shiho Asaka4, Tanri Shiozawa1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia is a benign disorder of the uterine cervix, its potential as a precursor of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma has been reported. However, the natural history of the disease and the frequency of malignant change are not fully understood. We evaluated the frequency of malignant change of clinical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia and explored useful parameters indicating malignant change.Entities:
Keywords: adenocarcinoma; pathology; uterine cervical neoplasms
Year: 2020 PMID: 32883699 PMCID: PMC7548537 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer ISSN: 1048-891X Impact factor: 3.437
Figure 1Diagnosis and management of cervical multi-cystic lesions. This is a modified version of Figure 1 in our previous report.6 AGC-FN, atypical glandular cells-favor neoplastic; AGC-NOS, atypical glandular cells-not otherwise specified; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; RH, radical hysterectomy; sLEGH, suspected lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; sMDA-Ca, suspected minimal deviation adenocarcinoma or carcinoma; sNC, suspected nabothian cyst; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; TCR, transcervical resection; TLH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Figure 2Summary of the clinical course of patients with multi-cystic lesions of the uterine cervix, managed according to our protocol. LEGH, lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; MDA, minimal deviation adenocarcinoma; sLEGH, suspected lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; sMDA-Ca, suspected minimal deviation adenocarcinoma or carcinoma; sNC, suspected nabothian cyst.
Summary of 15 patients with suspected minimal deviation adenocarcinoma or carcinoma who underwent immediate hysterectomy
| Case No | Age (years) | MRI findings | Cytology | ‘Yellow/orange’ mucin | HIK1083 test | Cervical biopsy/ conization | Mode of surgery | Pathological diagnosis |
| 1 | 55 | SP | Adenocarcinoma | – | – | Adenocarcinoma/NA | LRH, BSO, PLN | GAS |
| 2 | 37 | SP | Adenocarcinoma | – | + | GAS/NA | RH, BSO, PLN | GAS |
| 3 | 77 | SP | AGC-FN | NA | NA | MDA/NA | TAH, BSO, PLN, PAN | GAS, MDA |
| 4 | 42 | SP | AGC-NOS | NA | NA | NA/NA | RH, BSO, PLN | MDA |
| 5 | 49 | SP, IP | AGC-FN | + | + | Adenocarcinoma/NA | RH, BSO, PLN, PAN | GAS, MDA, LEGH with atypia, LEGH |
| 6 | 41 | CP | Adenocarcinoma | + | + | Mucinous carcinoma, AIS/AIS | TAH, BSO | GAS, AIS, LEGH with atypia, LEGH |
| 7 | 46 | SP | Adenocarcinoma | NA | + | GAS/NA | RH, BSO, PLN, PAN | GAS, MDA, LEGH |
| 8 | 52 | MP | AGC-FN | + | + | Adenocarcinoma/adenocarcinoma LEGH | TAH, BSO | GAS, LEGH |
| 9 | 41 | SP | AGC-FN | + | + | Adenocarcinoma/NA | RH, BSO, PLN | GAS, UEA |
| 10 | 62 | SP, IP | Adenocarcinoma | NA | NA | Adenocarcinoma/NA | RH, BSO, PLN | Serous carcinoma, LEGH |
| 11 | 57 | SP, IP | NILM | – | – | Normal/NA | TAH, BSO | LEGH with atypia |
| 12 | 33 | MP | AGC-FN | + | + | NA/LEGH with atypia | TAH | LEGH with atypia |
| 13 | 44 | IP | AGC-NOS | + | + | LEGH with atypia/NA | TAH | LEGH with atypia |
| 14 | 42 | CP | AGC-FN | + | + | Normal/LEGH with atypia | TLH | LEGH with atypia |
| 15 | 47 | MP | NILM | – | NA | NA/NA | RH, BSO, PLN | LEGH |
AGC-FN, atypical glandular cells-favor neoplastic; AGC-NOS, atypical glandular cells-not otherwise specified; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; CP, cosmos pattern; GAS, gastric-type mucinous carcinoma; IP, invasion pattern; LEGH, lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; LRH, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; MDA, minimal deviation adenocarcinoma; MP, microcystic pattern; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not available; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; PAN, para-aortic lymphadenectomy; PLN, pelvic lymphadenectomy; RH, radical hysterectomy; SP, solid pattern; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; TLH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy; UEA, usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Summary of 13 patients with suspected lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia who underwent immediate hysterectomy
| Case | Age | MRI findings | Cytology | ‘Yellow/orange’ mucin | HIK1083 test | Cervical biopsy /Conization | Mode of surgery | Pathological diagnosis |
| 16 | 48 | CP | NILM | – | + | NA/NA | TAH | LEGH with atypia |
| 17 | 33 | MP | AGC-NOS | + | + | LEGH with atypia/LEGH with atypia | TLH | LEGH with atypia |
| 18 | 40 | CP | NILM | – | + | LEGH/NA | TAH, BSO | LEGH |
| 19 | 46 | CP | NILM | NA | + | Normal/NA | TAH | LEGH |
| 20 | 57 | CP | AGC-NOS | + | + | NA/NA | TAH | LEGH |
| 21 | 42 | CCP | AGC-NOS | – | + | NA/NA | TAH | LEGH |
| 22 | 68 | CCP | NILM | + | + | NA/NA | TAH | LEGH |
| 23 | 47 | CCP | NILM | – | + | Normal/NA | TAH, BSO | LEGH |
| 24 | 53 | CP | AGC-NOS | + | + | NA/LEGH | TLH, BSO | LEGH |
| 25 | 49 | MP | AGC-NOS | + | + | CIN3, LEGH/NA | TAH | CIN3, LEGH |
| 26 | 52 | CP | AGC-NOS | + | + | AIS, LEGH/AIS, LEGH | TLH | AIS, LEGH |
| 27 | 53 | CP | NILM | – | – | Normal/NA | TLH, BSO | Tunnel cluster* |
| 28 | 48 | MP | NILM | – | + | NA/NA | TAH, BSO | NC† |
*With atypical polypoid adenomyoma.
†With endometrial carcinoma.
AGC-NOS, atypical glandular cells-not otherwise specified; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; CCP, coarse cystic pattern; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CP, cosmos pattern; LEGH, lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; MP, microcystic pattern; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not available; NC, nabothian cyst; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; sLEGH, suspected lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; TLH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Summary of 12 patients with suspected lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia who underwent hysterectomy after follow-up
| Case No | Age (years) | Reason for operation | Reasons for s/o malig | MRI findings | Growth rate (%) | Cytology | ‘Yellow/orange’ mucin | HIK1083 test | Cervical biopsy /conization | Mode of surgery | Pathological diagnosis, stage | F/U period (months) | State at last F/U |
| 29 | 50 | s/o malig | Increased size, worsening cytology | CP | 38.1 | AGC-NOS→AGC-FN | + | + | s/o Adenoca/MDA | RH, BSO, PLN, OM | MDA, IIB | 58 | NED |
| 30 | 55 | s/o malig | Increased size | CP | 87.5 | AGC-NOS | + | + | NA/NA | TAH, BSO | LEGH with atypia | 3 | NED |
| 31 | 33 | s/o malig | Increased size | CP | 148 | NILM→AGC-NOS | - → + | - → + | NA/LEGH with atypia | TAH, BSO | LEGH with atypia | 154 | NED |
| 32 | 49 | s/o malig | Increased size, DR | CP | 29.1 | AGC-NOS | + | + | NA/LEGH | TAH, BSO | LEGH | 31 | NED |
| 33 | 49 | s/o malig | Increased size | CP | 33.3 | AGC-NOS | + | + | NA/NA | TLH, BSO | LEGH | 51 | NED |
| 34 | 41 | s/o malig | Increased size, IP | CP | 45 | AGC-NOS | + | + | No malig/NA | TLH | LEGH | 61 | NED |
| 35 | 39 | s/o malig | Increased size | CP | 42.9 | AGC-NOS | + | + | LEGH/NA | TAH | LEGH | 68 | NED |
| 36 | 36 | s/o malig | Increased size, DR, worsening cytology | CP | 28.5 | AGC-NOS→AGC-FN | + | + | NA/LEGH | TAH | LEGH | 91 | NED |
| 37 | 34 | s/o malig | Increased size, SP | CP | 100 | AGC-NOS | + | + | NA/NA | TLH | LEGH | 47 | NED |
| 38 | 33 | s/o malig | Worsening cytology | CP | −14.3 | AGC-NOS→AGC-FN | – | + | NA/NA | TAH, BSO, OM | LEGH | 25 | Died of OvCa |
| 39 | 37 | Other disease* | – | CP | −29.2 | AGC-NOS | + | + | No malig/LEGH | TLH, BSO | LEGH | 96 | NED |
| 40 | 35 | Other disease† | – | CP | −31.8 | AGC-NOS | + | + | NA/NA | TLH | LEGH | 72 | NED |
*Atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
†Adenomyosis.
AGC-FN, atypical glandular cells-favor neoplastic; AGC-NOS, atypical glandular cells-not otherwise specified; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; ca, carcinoma; CP, cosmos pattern; DR, diffusion restriction; F/U, follow-up; IP, invasion pattern; LEGH, lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; MDA, minimal deviation adenocarcinoma; MRI, magnetic resonance image; NA, not available; NED, no evidence of disease; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; No malig, no malignancy; OM, omentectomy; OvCa, ovarian cancer; PLN, pelvic lymphadenectomy; RH, radical hysterectomy; sLEGH, suspected lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; s/o Adenoca, suspicious of adenocarcinoma; s/o malig, suspicious of malignancy; SP, solid pattern; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; TLH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy.