| Literature DB >> 27718288 |
Hirofumi Ando1, Tsutomu Miyamoto2, Hiroyasu Kashima1, Akiko Takatsu1, Keiko Ishii3, Yasunari Fujinaga4, Tanri Shiozawa1.
Abstract
AIM: The proper preoperative diagnosis and management of cervical proliferative disorders presenting with multiple cysts, including minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA), lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH), and nabothian cyst (NC), have not been fully established. We previously proposed a management protocol comprising a diagnostic approach using cytology, magnetic resonance imaging, and gastric-type mucin and subsequent treatment. We herein evaluate the usefulness of this protocol and implications of GNAS mutations in LEGH.Entities:
Keywords: adenocarcinoma; follow-up studies; gastric mucins; mutation; uterine cervical neoplasms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27718288 PMCID: PMC5108490 DOI: 10.1111/jog.13083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res ISSN: 1341-8076 Impact factor: 1.730
Figure 1Flow chart for the diagnosis and management of cervical multicystic lesions. This figure is a modified version of our original protocol. AGC‐FN, atypical glandular cells – favor neoplastic; AGC‐NOS, atypical glandular cells – not otherwise significant; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; Ca, carcinoma; LEGH, lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; MDA, minimal deviation adenocarcinoma; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; RH, radical hysterectomy; S/O, suspicion of; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy.
Patient characteristics
| Clinical diagnosis | Number of cases | Age | Watery discharge | Abnormal cytology (Gl. atypia) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD |
|
| ||
| S/O MDA‐Ca | 10 | 50.7 ± 12.2 | 5 (50%) | 7 (70%) |
| S/O LEGH | 59 | 46.7 ± 9.8 | 30 (50.8%) | 5 (8.5%) |
| NC | 25 | 48.9 ± 11.2 | 4 (16%) | 0 (0%) |
| Total | 94 | 47.8 ± 10.5 | 39 (41.5%) | 12 (12.8%) |
Gl. atypia, glandular atypia; NC, nabothian cyst; SD, standard deviation; S/O MDA‐Ca, suspicious of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma or carcinoma; S/O LEGH, suspicious of lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia.
Figure 2Summary of clinical courses of patients with multicystic lesions of the uterine cervix, managed according to our protocol. Ca, carcinoma; LEGH, lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; MDA, minimal deviation adenocarcinoma; NC, nabothian cyst; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; RH, radical hysterectomy; S/O, suspicion of; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; TLH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Clinicopathologic summary of patients who underwent hysterectomy
| Clinical diagnosis | Case | MRI finding | Cytology | HIK test | Cervical biopsy | Mode of surgery | Pathological diagnosis | LM / LVSI | Ovarian‐meta | Stage | F/U period (months) | Status at last F/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S/O MDA‐Ca | 1 | Solid and invasion pattern | Adenoca. | NA | Adenoca. | RH, BSO, PLN | Serous adenoca, LEGH | − | − | IB1 | 68 | Alive |
| 2 | Solid and invasion pattern | AGC‐FN | + | Adenoca. | RH, BSO, PLN, PAN | GAS, MDA, LEGH with atypia, LEGH | + | − | IIB | 33 | Alive | |
| 3 | Solid pattern | AGC‐FN | + | Adenoca. | RH, BSO, PLN | GAS, Endocervical type muc. adenoca. | + | + | IIA1 | 19 | DOD | |
| 4 | Solid pattern | AGC‐FN | NA | MDA | TAH, BSO, PLN, PAN | GAS, MDA | + | + | IB2 | 5 | DOD | |
| 5 | Solid pattern | Adenoca. | + | Adenoca. | RH, BSO, PLN. PAN | GAS, MDA, LEGH | + | − | IB2 | 3 | Alive | |
| 6 | Microcystic pattern | AGC‐FN | + | Adenoca. | TAH, BSO | GAS, LEGH | − | − | IIA1 | 4 | Alive | |
| 7 | Solid pattern | AGC‐NOS | NA | NA | RH, BSO, PLN | MDA | − | − | IB1 | 24 | DOD | |
| 8 | Microcystic pattern | AGC‐FN | + | NA | TAH | LEGH with atypia | − | − | − | 63 | Alive | |
| 9 | Solid and invasion pattern | NILM | − | Normal | TAH, BSO | LEGH with atypia + mucinous adenoma | − | − | − | 20 | Alive | |
| 10 | Microcystic pattern | NILM | NA | Normal | RH, BSO, PLN | LEGH | − | − | − | 131 | Alive | |
| S/O LEGH | 11 | Cosmos pattern | NILM | + | NA | TAH | LEGH with atypia | − | − | − | 32 | Alive |
| 12 | Cosmos pattern | AGC‐NOS | + | NA | TAH | LEGH | − | − | − | 33 | Alive | |
| 13 | Coarse cystic pattern | AGC‐NOS | + | NA | TAH | LEGH | − | − | − | 85 | Alive | |
| 14 | Microcystic pattern | AGC‐NOS | + | LEGH | TAH, BSO | LEGH | − | − | − | 33 | DOO | |
| 15 | Cosmos pattern | AGC‐NOS | + | NA | TAH | LEGH | − | − | − | 21 | Alive | |
| 16 | Cosmos pattern | NILM | + | Normal | TAH | LEGH | − | − | − | 61 | Alive | |
| 17 | Cosmos pattern | NILM | + | LEGH | TAH, BSO | LEGH | − | − | − | 12 | Alive | |
| 18 | Cosmos pattern | AGC‐NOS | + | NA | TLH, BSO | LEGH | − | − | − | 17 | Alive | |
| 19 | Coarse cystic pattern | NILM | + | NA | TAH | LEGH | − | − | − | 136 | Alive | |
| 20 | Coarse cystic pattern | NILM | + | Normal | TAH, BSO | LEGH | − | − | − | 122 | Alive |
Adenoca., adenocarcinoma; AGC‐FN: atypical glandular cells‐favor neoplastic, AGC‐NOS: atypical glandular cells‐not otherwise significant, BSO: bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy, DOD: dead of disease, DOO: dead of other causes; F/U, follow‐up; GAS: gastric‐type adenocarcinoma, LEGH: lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia, LM: lymph node metastasis, LVSI: lymphovascular space invasion, MDA, minimal deviation adenocarcinoma; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; muc. adenoca., mucinous adenocarcinoma; NA, not available; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; PAN: para‐aortic lymphadenectomy, PLN: pelvic lymphadenectomy, RH: radical hysterectomy, TAH: total abdominal hysterectomy, TLH: total laparoscopic hysterectomy; S/O MDA‐Ca, suspicious of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma or carcinoma; S/O LEGH, suspicious of lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia.
Figure 3Magnetic resonance imaging findings of patients who underwent hysterectomy, as shown in Table 2. (a,b) A typical solid pattern was observed in case 5. (c,d) A combination of solid pattern and invasion pattern. Microcystic and solid components (arrows) existed in the lateral portion of the cervix, suggesting stromal invasion, as observed in Case 1. (e,f) A typical cosmos pattern observed in Case 18 (i.e., small cysts or solid parts were surrounded by larger cysts). (g,h) A microcystic pattern: the aggregation of micro cysts, with the absence of large surrounding cysts or signs of invasion in Case 14.
Figure 4Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathologic findings of two cases with increased lesion sizes during the follow‐up. (a–c) Case 21. (a) MRI showed the lesion size to be 15 × 10 × 8 mm at the first visit. (b) The lesion increased to 21 × 21 × 14 mm with more small cysts. (c) Hysterectomy specimen histologically showed lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) with atypia. (d–i) Case 22. (d) The lesion size was 39 × 33 × 33 mm with a typical cosmos pattern at the first visit. (e) The lesion size increased 4 years later. (f) The lesion increased 66 × 45 × 37 mm 12 years after the first MRI. (g) A hysterectomy specimen showing a watery discharge. (h,i) LEGH with atypia was noted.
Mutational analysis of the GNAS gene
| Case | Age (years) | Clinical signs | HIK test | Increased lesion size | Histology of the dissected area | GNAS gene mutation | Peptide alteration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 49 | Watery discharge, | + | No | MDA | WT | WT |
| Vaginal bleeding | LEGH with atypia | WT | WT | ||||
| LEGH | WT | WT | |||||
| 7 | 42 | Vaginal bleeding | NA | No | MDA | WT | WT |
| 8 | 34 | Watery discharge | + | No | LEGH with atypia | WT | WT |
| 9 | 57 | Cervical cyst | − | No | LEGH with atypia | c.601 C > T | p.R201C |
| Vaginal bleeding | LEGH | WT | WT | ||||
| 21 | 54 | Watery discharge | + | Yes | LEGH with atypia | c.602 G > A | p.R201H |
| 22 | 33 | Watery discharge | + | Yes | LEGH with atypia | WT | WT |
| 12 | 42 | Watery discharge | + | No | LEGH | WT | WT |
| 13 | 42 | Cervical cyst | + | No | LEGH | WT | WT |
| 14 | 49 | Cervical cyst | + | No | LEGH | WT | WT |
| 16 | 46 | Watery discharge | + | No | LEGH | WT | WT |
| 17 | 40 | Watery discharge | + | No | LEGH | WT | WT |
| 19 | 68 | Vaginal bleeding | + | No | LEGH | WT | WT |
| 10 | 47 | Watery discharge | NA | No | LEGH | WT | WT |
| 23 | 48 | Uterine prolapse | NA | No | LEGH | WT | WT |
In Case 2 and 9, each lesions (MDA, LEGH with atypia and LEGH) were separately collected and used for the analysis. LEGH, lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; MDA, minimal deviation adenocarcinoma; NA, not available; WT, wild type.