Literature DB >> 32883625

Real-time Augmented Reality Three-dimensional Guided Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Experience and Evaluation of the Impact on Surgical Planning.

Riccardo Schiavina1, Lorenzo Bianchi2, Simone Lodi3, Laura Cercenelli4, Francesco Chessa1, Barbara Bortolani5, Caterina Gaudiano6, Carlo Casablanca7, Matteo Droghetti7, Angelo Porreca8, Daniele Romagnoli8, Rita Golfieri6, Francesca Giunchi9, Michelangelo Fiorentino9, Emanuela Marcelli3, Stefano Diciotti10, Eugenio Brunocilla1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) is a novel technology adopted in prostatic surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a 3D model with AR (AR-3D model), to guide nerve sparing (NS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), on surgical planning. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results available were scheduled for AR-3D NS RARP. INTERVENTION: Segmentation of mpMRI and creation of 3D virtual models were achieved. To develop AR guidance, the surgical DaVinci video stream was sent to an AR-dedicated personal computer, and the 3D virtual model was superimposed and manipulated in real time on the robotic console. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The concordance of localisation of the index lesion between the 3D model and the pathological specimen was evaluated using a prostate map of 32 specific areas. A preliminary surgical plan to determinate the extent of the NS approach was recorded based on mpMRI. The final surgical plan was reassessed during surgery by implementation of the AR-3D model guidance. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was 15.4% in the overall patient population; three patients (11.5%) had PSMs at the level of the index lesion. AR-3D technology changed the NS surgical plan in 38.5% of men on patient-based and in 34.6% of sides on side-based analysis, resulting in overall appropriateness of 94.4%. The 3D model revealed 70%, 100%, and 92% of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, at the 32-area map analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: AR-3D guided surgery is useful for improving the real-time identification of the index lesion and allows changing of the NS approach in approximately one out of three cases, with overall appropriateness of 94.4%. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Augmented reality three-dimensional guided robot-assisted radical prostatectomy allows identification of the index prostate cancer during surgery, to tailor the surgical dissection to the index lesion and to change the extent of nerve-sparing dissection.
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Index lesion; Real-time guided surgery; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy; Three-dimensional reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32883625     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  10 in total

Review 1.  PI-RADS version 2.1 for the evaluation of transition zone lesions: a practical guide for radiologists.

Authors:  Caterina Gaudiano; Arianna Rustici; Beniamino Corcioni; Federica Ciccarese; Lorenzo Bianchi; Riccardo Schiavina; Francesca Giunchi; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Eugenio Brunocilla; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Development and clinical applicability of MRI-based 3D prostate models in the planning of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hans Veerman; Thierry N Boellaard; Jari A van der Eijk; Judith H Sluijter; Ton A Roeleveld; Tim M van der Sluis; Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen; Esther Wit; Maarten J A van Alphen; Robert L P van Veen; André N Vis; Henk G van der Poel; Pim J van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  The impact of 3D models on positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Cristian Fiori; Francesco Porpiglia; Enrico Checcucci; Angela Pecoraro; Daniele Amparore; Sabrina De Cillis; Stefano Granato; Gabriele Volpi; Michele Sica; Paolo Verri; Alberto Piana; Pietro Piazzolla; Matteo Manfredi; Enrico Vezzetti; Michele Di Dio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Augmented Reality to Assist Skin Paddle Harvesting in Osteomyocutaneous Fibular Flap Reconstructive Surgery: A Pilot Evaluation on a 3D-Printed Leg Phantom.

Authors:  Laura Cercenelli; Federico Babini; Giovanni Badiali; Salvatore Battaglia; Achille Tarsitano; Claudio Marchetti; Emanuela Marcelli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  [Virtual and augmented reality in urology].

Authors:  P Sparwasser; M Haack; L Frey; A Haferkamp; H Borgmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  AEducaAR, Anatomical Education in Augmented Reality: A Pilot Experience of an Innovative Educational Tool Combining AR Technology and 3D Printing.

Authors:  Laura Cercenelli; Alessia De Stefano; Anna Maria Billi; Alessandra Ruggeri; Emanuela Marcelli; Claudio Marchetti; Lucia Manzoli; Stefano Ratti; Giovanni Badiali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Advancements in surgical technique and perioperative care.

Authors:  Isaac Palma-Zamora; Firas Abdollah; Craig Rogers; Wooju Jeong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-27

8.  The Role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the Characterization of High-Risk Primary Prostate Cancer: Comparison with [11C]Choline PET/CT and Histopathological Analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zanoni; Riccardo Mei; Lorenzo Bianchi; Francesca Giunchi; Lorenzo Maltoni; Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone; Cristina Nanni; Irene Bossert; Antonella Matti; Riccardo Schiavina; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Cristina Fonti; Filippo Lodi; Antonietta D'Errico; Eugenio Brunocilla; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Anatomical Fundamentals and Current Surgical Knowledge of Prostate Anatomy Related to Functional and Oncological Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benedikt Hoeh; Mike Wenzel; Lukas Hohenhorst; Jens Köllermann; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Derya Tilki; Jochen Walz; Marina Kosiba; Andreas Becker; Severine Banek; Luis A Kluth; Philipp Mandel; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Felix K H Chun; Felix Preisser
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 10.  Mixed reality applications in urology: Requirements and future potential.

Authors:  Gerd Reis; Mehmet Yilmaz; Jason Rambach; Alain Pagani; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Arkadiusz Miernik; Paul Lesur; Nareg Minaskan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.