| Literature DB >> 32883049 |
Anita M van den Hoek1, Lars Verschuren2, Nicole Worms1, Anita van Nieuwkoop1, Christa de Ruiter1, Joline Attema1, Aswin L Menke1, Martien P M Caspers2, Sridhar Radhakrishnan3, Kanita Salic1, Robert Kleemann1,4.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a fast-growing liver disorder that is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Animal models adequately mimicking this condition are scarce. We herein investigate whether Ldlr-/-. Leiden mice on different high-fat diets represent a suitable NASH model. Ldlr-/-. Leiden mice were fed a healthy chow diet or fed a high-fat diet (HFD) containing lard or a fast food diet (FFD) containing milk fat. Additionally, the response to treatment with obeticholic acid (OCA) was evaluated. Both high-fat diets induced obesity, hyperlipidemia, hyperinsulinemia, and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. Mice on both diets developed progressive macro- and microvesicular steatosis, hepatic inflammation, and fibrosis, along with atherosclerosis. HFD induced more severe hyperinsulinemia, while FFD induced more severe hepatic inflammation with advanced (F3) bridging fibrosis, as well as more severe atherosclerosis. OCA treatment significantly reduced hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, and it did not affect atherosclerosis. Hepatic transcriptome analysis was compared with human NASH and illustrated similarity. The present study defines a translational model of NASH with progressive liver fibrosis and simultaneous atherosclerosis development. By adaptation of the fat content of the diet, either insulin resistance (HFD) or hepatic inflammation and fibrosis (FFD) can be aggravated.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; NASH; animal model; atherosclerosis; fibrosis; inflammation; metabolic syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32883049 PMCID: PMC7565967 DOI: 10.3390/cells9092014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Metabolic parameters.
| Chow | HFD | FFD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 38.3 ± 1.5 | 52.3 ± 1.1 *** | 48.7 ± 1.5 *** |
| Food intake (kCal/mouse/day) | 13.5 ± 0.8 | 12.5 ± 0.6 | 14.9 ± 1.9 |
| Liver weight (g) | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.2 *** | 5.9 ± 0.4 * |
| Liver weight (% of body weight) | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.2 *** | 7.1 ± 0.3 *** |
| Blood glucose (mM) | 7.7 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 6.5 ± 0.3 ** |
| Plasma insulin (ng/mL) | 2.9 ± 0.6 | 14.7 ± 4.2 *** | 3.9 ± 0.4 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 1.4 ** | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| Plasma cholesterol (mM) | 8.0 ± 0.7 | 32.2 ± 3.7 *** | 41.3 ± 4.7 *** |
| Plasma triglycerides (mM) | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 1.3 ** | 8.3 ± 1.2 *** |
| Plasma ALT (U/L) | 53.3 ± 7.1 | 363.7 ± 64.8 ** | 348.6 ± 33.0 *** |
| Plasma AST (U/L) | 88.2 ± 8.2 | 449.1 ± 69.1 *** | 342.9 ± 58.4 *** |
| Plasma SAA (µg/mL) | 39.6 ± 4.2 | 244.6 ± 54.6 *** | 318.6 ± 73.3 *** |
| Plasma E-selectin (ng/mL) | 61.3 ± 3.7 | 83.0 ± 10.1 * | 83.7 ± 3.4 *** |
| Plasma MCP-1 (pg/mL) | 33.2 ± 6.5 | 75.4 ± 11.2 ** | 70.7 ± 6.3 ** |
Ldlr−/−.Leiden mice were fed a healthy chow diet or fed a high-fat (HFD) diet containing lard fat or a fast food diet (FFD) containing milk fat for 28 weeks. Data represent mean ± SEM for n ≥ 8 mice/group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. chow. ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, SAA: serum amyloid A.
Figure 1Representative images of perigonadal white adipose tissue (WAT) cross-sections (A) stained with hematoxylin–phloxine–saffron (HPS) and WAT weight of different adipose tissue depots (B) from Ldlr−/−.Leiden mice fed a healthy chow diet or fed a high-fat diet (HFD) containing lard or a fast food diet (FFD) containing milk fat for 28 weeks. Perigonadal WAT inflammation was analyzed by measuring the number of crown-like-structures (CLS)/mm2 (C). Values represent mean ± SEM for ≥8 mice per group. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. chow; # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001 FFD vs. HFD.
Figure 2Representative images of liver cross-sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Sirius Red (A) and quantitative analysis (B–F) from Ldlr−/−.Leiden mice fed a healthy chow diet or fed a high-fat diet (HFD) containing lard or a fast food diet (FFD) containing milk fat for 28 weeks. Macrovesicular (B) and microvesicular (C) steatosis as a percentage of total liver area, inflammation as number of inflammatory aggregates per mm2 microscopic field (D), and hepatic fibrosis were analyzed as percentage Sirius Red of surface area (E) or biochemically analyzed hepatic collagen/mg protein (F). Values represent mean ± SEM for ≥8 mice per group. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. chow; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 FFD vs. HFD.
Figure 3Quantitative analysis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) from Ldlr−/−.Leiden mice fed a healthy chow diet for 28 weeks or fed a fast food diet (FFD) containing milk fat for 12, 22, or 28 weeks. Data of FFD for 12 weeks were obtained by taking a liver biopsy of the mice that continued on the FFD for 22 weeks and are from a separate group of animals than mice that were fed the different diets for 28 weeks. In addition, mice were fed the FFD and treated with a relatively low dose of obeticholic acid (OCA) (10 mg/kg/d) from week 18 to 28. Macrovesicular (A) and microvesicular (B) steatosis as the percentage of total liver area, inflammation as the number of inflammatory aggregates per mm2 microscopic field (C), and hepatic fibrosis as the percentage of Sirius Red of surface area (D) were analyzed. Values represent mean ± SEM for ≥8 mice per group. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. chow or * p < 0.05 FFD + OCA vs. FFD t = 28 (as indicated by bar).
Figure 4Venn diagram (A) illustrating the overlap of differentially expressed pathways (pathway pval < 0.01) of livers between Ldlr−/−.Leiden mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) vs. healthy chow diet (blue circle) or fed a fast food diet (FFD) vs. healthy chow diet (green circle) for 28 weeks. N ≥ 8 mice per group. The shared top 10 of significantly enriched biological processes (−log (p-value)) for the genes affected by HFD (blue bars) and FFD (green bars) vs. chow (B). Differences between HFD and FFD in downregulation of ATP synthases in complex V of oxidative phosphorylation (C). Quantification of 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) marker of oxidative stress using stained liver sections ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. chow or * p < 0.05 FFD + OCA vs. FFD t = 28 (as indicated by bar) (D). Effect of HFD and FFD on different inflammatory pathways, expressed as median (2logR) of all genes in the listed inflammatory pathway (E). Heatmap showing expression of genes differentially regulated in human non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) vs. normal controls [6] in Ldlr−/−.Leiden mice fed the HFD or FFD for 28 weeks relative to chow (F). Blue color indicates downregulation, and red color indicates upregulation. Genes with # indicate genes with differential regulation vs. human regulation. Visualization (G) of the differentially expressed pathways (DEPs) distinguishing human NASH patients vs. normal controls and representation thereof in the mice on HFD or FFD.
Figure 5Representative images of atherosclerotic plaques in aortic root section (A) stained with hematoxylin–phloxine–saffron (HPS) from Ldlr−/−.Leiden mice fed a healthy chow diet for 28 weeks or fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 28 weeks or fed a fast food diet (FFD) for 22 or 28 weeks. In addition, mice were fed the FFD and supplemented with a relatively low dose of OCA (10 mg/kg/d) from weeks 18 to 28. Total lesion area per cross-section was quantified (B) and lesion severity (C) was assessed, categorized as mild lesions (type I–III) and severe lesions (IV–V). Values represent mean ± SEM for ≥8 mice per group. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. chow.