UNLABELLED: Clinicians rely upon the severity of liver fibrosis to segregate patients with well-compensated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) into subpopulations at high- versus low-risk for eventual liver-related morbidity and mortality. We compared hepatic gene expression profiles in high- and low-risk NAFLD patients to identify processes that distinguish the two groups and hence might be novel biomarkers or treatment targets. Microarray analysis was used to characterize gene expression in percutaneous liver biopsies from low-risk, "mild" NAFLD patients (fibrosis stage 0-1; n = 40) and high-risk, "severe" NAFLD patients (fibrosis stage 3-4; n = 32). Findings were validated in a second, independent cohort and confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry (IHC). As a group, patients at risk for bad NAFLD outcomes had significantly worse liver injury and more advanced fibrosis (severe NAFLD) than clinically indistinguishable NAFLD patients with a good prognosis (mild NAFLD). A 64-gene profile reproducibly differentiated severe NAFLD from mild NAFLD, and a 20-gene subset within this profile correlated with NAFLD severity, independent of other factors known to influence NAFLD progression. Multiple genes involved with tissue repair/regeneration and certain metabolism-related genes were induced in severe NAFLD. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and IHC confirmed deregulation of metabolic and regenerative pathways in severe NAFLD and revealed overlap among the gene expression patterns of severe NAFLD, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. CONCLUSION: By demonstrating specific metabolic and repair pathways that are differentially activated in livers with severe NAFLD, gene profiling identified novel targets that can be exploited to improve diagnosis and treatment of patients who are at greatest risk for NAFLD-related morbidity and mortality.
UNLABELLED: Clinicians rely upon the severity of liver fibrosis to segregate patients with well-compensated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) into subpopulations at high- versus low-risk for eventual liver-related morbidity and mortality. We compared hepatic gene expression profiles in high- and low-risk NAFLD patients to identify processes that distinguish the two groups and hence might be novel biomarkers or treatment targets. Microarray analysis was used to characterize gene expression in percutaneous liver biopsies from low-risk, "mild" NAFLD patients (fibrosis stage 0-1; n = 40) and high-risk, "severe" NAFLD patients (fibrosis stage 3-4; n = 32). Findings were validated in a second, independent cohort and confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry (IHC). As a group, patients at risk for bad NAFLD outcomes had significantly worse liver injury and more advanced fibrosis (severe NAFLD) than clinically indistinguishable NAFLD patients with a good prognosis (mild NAFLD). A 64-gene profile reproducibly differentiated severe NAFLD from mild NAFLD, and a 20-gene subset within this profile correlated with NAFLD severity, independent of other factors known to influence NAFLD progression. Multiple genes involved with tissue repair/regeneration and certain metabolism-related genes were induced in severe NAFLD. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and IHC confirmed deregulation of metabolic and regenerative pathways in severe NAFLD and revealed overlap among the gene expression patterns of severe NAFLD, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. CONCLUSION: By demonstrating specific metabolic and repair pathways that are differentially activated in livers with severe NAFLD, gene profiling identified novel targets that can be exploited to improve diagnosis and treatment of patients who are at greatest risk for NAFLD-related morbidity and mortality.
Authors: S C Lu; L Alvarez; Z Z Huang; L Chen; W An; F J Corrales; M A Avila; G Kanel; J M Mato Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-04-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Steven Woon-Choy Tsang; Tina Fan; Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu; Jean Woo; Anthony Wing-Hung Chan; Paul Cheung-Lung Choi; Angel Mei-Ling Chim; James Yun-Wong Lau; Francis Ka-Leung Chan; Joseph Jao-Yiu Sung; Henry Lik-Yuen Chan Journal: Gut Date: 2011-02-21 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Chun-Tao Wai; Joel K Greenson; Robert J Fontana; John D Kalbfleisch; Jorge A Marrero; Hari S Conjeevaram; Anna S-F Lok Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Gregory A Michelotti; Guanhua Xie; Marzena Swiderska; Steve S Choi; Gamze Karaca; Leandi Krüger; Richard Premont; Liu Yang; Wing-Kin Syn; Daniel Metzger; Anna Mae Diehl Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Wing-Kin Syn; Steve S Choi; Evaggelia Liaskou; Gamze F Karaca; Kolade M Agboola; Ye Htun Oo; Zhiyong Mi; Thiago A Pereira; Marzena Zdanowicz; Padmini Malladi; Yuping Chen; Cynthia Moylan; Youngmi Jung; Syamal D Bhattacharya; Vanessa Teaberry; Alessia Omenetti; Manal F Abdelmalek; Cynthia D Guy; David H Adams; Paul C Kuo; Gregory A Michelotti; Peter F Whitington; Anna Mae Diehl Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Joel T Haas; Luisa Vonghia; Denis A Mogilenko; An Verrijken; Olivier Molendi-Coste; Sébastien Fleury; Audrey Deprince; Artemii Nikitin; Eloïse Woitrain; Lucie Ducrocq-Geoffroy; Samuel Pic; Bruno Derudas; Hélène Dehondt; Céline Gheeraert; Luc Van Gaal; Ann Driessen; Philippe Lefebvre; Bart Staels; Sven Francque; David Dombrowicz Journal: Nat Metab Date: 2019-06-14
Authors: Maud Voisin; Matthew C Gage; Natalia Becares; Elina Shrestha; Edward A Fisher; Ines Pineda-Torra; Michael J Garabedian Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Mark J Canet; Rhiannon N Hardwick; April D Lake; Anika L Dzierlenga; John D Clarke; Michael J Goedken; Nathan J Cherrington Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Nicolas Goossens; Yujin Hoshida; Won Min Song; Minoa Jung; Philippe Morel; Shigeki Nakagawa; Bin Zhang; Jean-Louis Frossard; Laurent Spahr; Scott L Friedman; Francesco Negro; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Emiliano Giostra Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 11.382