Literature DB >> 32882126

When Good Intentions Go Bad-False Positive Microplastic Detection Caused by Disposable Gloves.

Cordula S Witzig1, Corinna Földi2, Katharina Wörle3, Peter Habermehl1, Marco Pittroff1, Yanina K Müller1, Tim Lauschke2, Peter Fiener4, Georg Dierkes2, Korbinian P Freier3, Nicole Zumbülte1.   

Abstract

Apart from being considered a potential threat to ecosystems and human health, the ubiquity of microplastics presents analytical challenges. There is a high risk of sample contamination during sampling, sample preparation, and analysis. In this study, the potential of sample contamination or misinterpretation due to substances associated with disposable laboratory gloves or reagents used during sample preparation was investigated. Leachates of 10 different types of disposable gloves were analyzed using Raman microspectroscopy (μ-Raman), Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy (μ-FTIR), and pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (pyr-GC/MS). There appeared to be polyethylene (PE) in almost all investigated glove leachates and with all applied methods. Closer investigations revealed that the leachates contained long-chain compounds such as stearates or fatty acids, which were falsely identified as PE by the applied analytical methods. Sodium dodecyl sulfate, which is commonly applied in microplastic research during sample preparation, may also be mistaken for PE. Therefore, μ-Raman, μ-FTIR, and pyr-GC/MS were further tested for their capability to distinguish among PE, sodium dodecyl sulfate, and stearates. It became clear that stearates and sodium dodecyl sulfates can cause substantial overestimation of PE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32882126     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

Review 1.  Microplastics in environment: global concern, challenges, and controlling measures.

Authors:  G Lamichhane; A Acharya; R Marahatha; B Modi; R Paudel; A Adhikari; B K Raut; S Aryal; N Parajuli
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Autofluorescence of Model Polyethylene Terephthalate Nanoplastics for Cell Interaction Studies.

Authors:  Francesca Lionetto; Maria Giulia Lionetto; Claudio Mele; Carola Esposito Corcione; Sonia Bagheri; Gayatri Udayan; Alfonso Maffezzoli
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Detection and characterization of small-sized microplastics (≥ 5 µm) in milk products.

Authors:  Paulo A Da Costa Filho; Daniel Andrey; Bjorn Eriksen; Rafael P Peixoto; Benoit M Carreres; Mark E Ambühl; Josep B Descarrega; Stephane Dubascoux; Pascal Zbinden; Alexandre Panchaud; Eric Poitevin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Impact of coronavirus pandemic litters on microfiber pollution-effect of personal protective equipment and disposable face masks.

Authors:  R Rathinamoorthy; S Raja Balasaraswathi
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 5.  Analysis of microplastics in drinking water and other clean water samples with micro-Raman and micro-infrared spectroscopy: minimum requirements and best practice guidelines.

Authors:  Darena Schymanski; Barbara E Oßmann; Nizar Benismail; Kada Boukerma; Gerald Dallmann; Elisabeth von der Esch; Dieter Fischer; Franziska Fischer; Douglas Gilliland; Karl Glas; Thomas Hofmann; Andrea Käppler; Sílvia Lacorte; Julie Marco; Maria El Rakwe; Jana Weisser; Cordula Witzig; Nicole Zumbülte; Natalia P Ivleva
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.142

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.