| Literature DB >> 32880993 |
Mingshan Xue1, Teng Zhang2, Haisheng Hu1, Zhifeng Huang1, Yingjie Zhen1, Yueting Liang1, Yifeng Zeng1, Tengchuan Jin3, Luqian Zhou1, Xiaohua D Zhang2, Baoqing Sun1.
Abstract
Our study intended to longitudinally explore the prediction effect of immunoglobulin A (IgA) on pulmonary exudation progression in COVID-19 patients. The serum IgA was tested with chemiluminescence method. Autoregressive moving average model was used to extrapolate the IgA levels before hospital admission. The positive rate of IgA and IgG in our cohort was 97% and 79.0%, respectively. In this study, the IgA levels peaks within 10-15 days after admission, while the IgG levels peaks at admission. We found that the time difference between their peaks was about 10 days. Viral RNA detection results showed that the positive rate in sputum and feces were the highest. Blood gas analysis showed that deterioration of hypoxia with the enlargement of pulmonary exudation area. And alveolar-arterial oxygen difference and oxygenation index were correlated with IgA and IgG. The results of biopsy showed that the epithelium of lung was exfoliated and the mucosa was edematous. In severe COVID-19 patients, the combination of IgA and IgG can predict the progress of pulmonary lesions and is closely related to hypoxemia and both also play an important defense role in invasion and destruction of bronchial and alveolar epithelium by SARS-CoV-2.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; IgA; IgG; prediction effects
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32880993 PMCID: PMC7461178 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Virol ISSN: 0146-6615 Impact factor: 20.693
Patient characteristics
| Common | Severe |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7 | 14 | |
| Age, y | 51.00 (49.00, 69.00) | 59.50 (49.00, 69.00) | .350 |
| Gender, male/female | 3/4 | 12/2 | .120 |
| IgA, mg/L | 10.34 (7.03, 31.49) | 14.33 (6.82, 28.72) | .005 |
| IgG, mg/L | 21.06 (16.53, 37.24) | 25.71 (15.43, 40.71) | .181 |
| CRP, mg/L | 2.54 (0.92, 12.29) | 7.07 (2.71, 12.29) | .009 |
| Hospital stays, days | 34.00 (27.00, 39.00) | 58.50 (44.00, 63.25) | .002 |
| D‐Dimer, μg/L | 558.0 (263.00, 853.00) | 4624.00 (2406.00, 9068.00) | .001 |
| AST, U/L | 27.40 (20.80, 37.20) | 39.20 (27.60, 62.30) | .001 |
|
| |||
| PaO2, mm Hg | 98.10 (83.95, 107.20) | 102.80 (82.28, 126.90) | .620 |
| PaCO2, mm Hg | 48.35 (41.15, 48.35) | 42.80 (39.80, 47.45) | .022 |
| Oxygenation index | 386.0 (253.30, 495.80) | 203.00 (136.00, 276.50) | .001 |
| Spiro‐index | 46 (−0.50, 133.50) | 210.00 (125.50, 372.00) | .001 |
| PA‐aDO2, mm Hg | 53.70 (23.10, 161.90) | 219.3 (158.60, 311.10) | .001 |
|
| |||
| White blood cell, 109/L | 4.80 (3.90, 6.20) | 8.60 (6.80, 11.50) | .001 |
| Neutrophil count, 109/L | 2.90 (2.30, 4.00) | 6.80 (4.80, 9.50) | .001 |
| Lymphocyte count, 109/L | 1.10 (0.90, 1.30) | 0.80 (0.60, 1.20) | .001 |
| Platelet count, 109/L | 250.0 (169.00, 332.00) | 172.5 (112.3, 233.0) | .001 |
| IL‐2, U/L | 0.56 (0.44, 0.70) | 0.73 (0.55, 1.09) | .001 |
| IL‐4, U/L | 0.94 (0.72, 1.36) | 1.13 (0.72, 1.88) | .264 |
| IL‐6, U/L | 5.18 (2.63, 9.84) | 34.62 (6.75, 108.10) | .001 |
| IL‐10, U/L | 2.82 (2.10, 3.98) | 4.68 (3.14, 7.67) | .001 |
| TNF‐α, U/L | 0.75 (0.56, 1.01) | 0.96 (0.70, 1.44) | .001 |
| IFN‐γ, U/L | 0.78 (0.51, 1.10) | 0.95 (0.60, 1.41) | .022 |
Note: The statistics in the table are the median (IQR) of the indices collected at all the time points during hospitalization.
Abbreviations: A‐aDO2, alveolar‐arterial oxygen difference; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CRP, C‐reactive protein; IFN, interferon; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IL, interleukin; PaO2, partial pressure of oxygen; PaCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 1The dynamics of IgA and IgG levels in severe COVID‐19 patients. The red points represented the median of IgA levels and the error bar represented the upper and lower quartiles. The trend of IgA levels before admission time was predicted by ARMA (1,1,0). The green points represented the median of IgG levels and the error bar represented the upper and lower quartiles. ARMA, autoregressive moving average; IgA, immunoglobulin A
Figure 2The trend of chest PA&LAT lung involvement analysis. A, The trend of chest PA&LAT and CT lung involvement area in severe COVID‐19 patients. The trend of chest PA&LAT before admission time was predicted by ARMA (0,2,0). The CT data in 1 to 5 days were missing, and no modeling and prediction of ARMA was carried out. B, The cross correlation between lung involvement area (chest PA&LAT and DR) and IgA levels. When the lag days of IgA was 10 days, the correlation was high (correlation coefficient is .6663, P < .05). C, The change of chest PA&LAT lung involvement area in severe COVID‐19 patients with remission of pulmonary lesions. The black points represent the predicting values of ARMA (0,2,0) before admission time. D, The change of chest PA&LAT lung involvement area in severe COVID‐19 patients with deterioration of pulmonary lesions. The black points represent the predicting values of ARMA (0,1,0) before admission time. ARMA, autoregressive moving average; CT, computed tomography; IgA, immunoglobulin A; LAT, lateral PA, posteroanterior
Figure 3The trend of hypoxia degree and the affected area of IgA and lung lesions. A‐aDO2, alveolar‐arterial oxygen difference; ABE, actual base residue; IgA, immunoglobulin A; DR: Digital X ‐ ray photography system (This is the same as what was mentioned above chest posteroanterior oblique and lateral views); PaO2, partial pressure of oxygen; PaCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; SBE, standard base residue. *P < .05, **P < .01