Ahuva Averin1, Amanda Silvia1, Lois Lamerato2, Kathryn Richert-Boe3, Manpreet Kaur2, Devi Sundaresan4, Neel Shah5, Mark Hatfield5, Tatiana Lawrence5, Gary H Lyman6, Derek Weycker7. 1. Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA. 2. Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA. 3. Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA. 4. Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, USA. 5. Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. 6. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 7. Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA. dweycker@pai2.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in US patients with selected metastatic cancers and chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and associated outcomes among the subgroup who did not receive prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at four US health systems and included adults with metastatic cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy (2009-2017). Patients were stratified by FN risk level based on risk factors and chemotherapy (low/unclassified risk, intermediate risk without any risk factors, intermediate risk with ≥ 1 risk factor [IR + 1], high risk [HR]). G-CSF use was evaluated among all patients stratified by FN risk, and FN/FN-related outcomes were evaluated among patients who did not receive first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis. RESULTS: Among 1457 metastatic cancer patients, 20.5% and 28.1% were classified as HR and IR + 1, respectively. First-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis use was 48.5% among HR patients and 13.9% among IR + 1 patients. In the subgroup not receiving first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis, FN incidence in cycle 1 was 7.8% for HR patients and 4.8% for IR + 1 patients; during the course, corresponding values were 16.9% and 15.9%. Most (> 90%) FN episodes required hospitalization, and mortality risk ranged from 7.1 to 26.9% across subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the majority of metastatic cancer chemotherapy patients for whom G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended did not receive it; FN incidence in this subgroup was notably high. Patients with elevated FN risk should be carefully identified and managed to ensure appropriate use of supportive care.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in US patients with selected metastatic cancers and chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and associated outcomes among the subgroup who did not receive prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at four US health systems and included adults with metastatic cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy (2009-2017). Patients were stratified by FN risk level based on risk factors and chemotherapy (low/unclassified risk, intermediate risk without any risk factors, intermediate risk with ≥ 1 risk factor [IR + 1], high risk [HR]). G-CSF use was evaluated among all patients stratified by FN risk, and FN/FN-related outcomes were evaluated among patients who did not receive first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis. RESULTS: Among 1457 metastatic cancerpatients, 20.5% and 28.1% were classified as HR and IR + 1, respectively. First-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis use was 48.5% among HR patients and 13.9% among IR + 1 patients. In the subgroup not receiving first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis, FN incidence in cycle 1 was 7.8% for HR patients and 4.8% for IR + 1 patients; during the course, corresponding values were 16.9% and 15.9%. Most (> 90%) FN episodes required hospitalization, and mortality risk ranged from 7.1 to 26.9% across subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the majority of metastatic cancer chemotherapy patients for whom G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended did not receive it; FN incidence in this subgroup was notably high. Patients with elevated FN risk should be carefully identified and managed to ensure appropriate use of supportive care.
Authors: Walter T Hughes; Donald Armstrong; Gerald P Bodey; Eric J Bow; Arthur E Brown; Thierry Calandra; Ronald Feld; Philip A Pizzo; Kenneth V I Rolston; Jerry L Shenep; Lowell S Young Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Arnold L Potosky; Jennifer L Malin; Benjamin Kim; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Solomon B Makgoeng; Nadia Howlader; Jane C Weeks Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-06-13 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J Crawford; H Ozer; R Stoller; D Johnson; G Lyman; I Tabbara; M Kris; J Grous; V Picozzi; G Rausch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gary H Lyman; Shannon L Michels; Matthew W Reynolds; Rich Barron; Karen Smoyer Tomic; Jingbo Yu Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jeffrey Crawford; Neelima Denduluri; Debra Patt; Xiaolong Jiao; Phuong Khanh Morrow; Jacob Garcia; Richard Barron; Gary H Lyman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Reshma L Mahtani; Rajesh Belani; Jeffrey Crawford; David Dale; Lucy DeCosta; Prasad L Gawade; Chanh Huynh; Tatiana Lawrence; Sandra Lewis; William W MacLaughlin; Mohit Narang; Robert Rifkin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael Gerard Baracy; Karen Hagglund; Sanjana Kulkarni; Fareeza Afzal; Katherine Arends; Robert T Morris; Leigh Ann Solomon; Muhammad Faisal Aslam; Logan Corey Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-07-24