Literature DB >> 21670423

Use of colony-stimulating factors with chemotherapy: opportunities for cost savings and improved outcomes.

Arnold L Potosky1, Jennifer L Malin, Benjamin Kim, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Solomon B Makgoeng, Nadia Howlader, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

Myeloid colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) decrease the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) from high-risk chemotherapy regimens administered to patients at 20% or greater risk of FN, but little is known about their use in clinical practice. We evaluated CSF use in a multiregional population-based cohort of lung and colorectal cancer patients (N = 1849). Only 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8% to 26%) patients treated with high-risk chemotherapy regimens received CSFs, compared with 18% (95% CI = 16% to 20%) and 10% (95% CI = 8% to 12%) of patients treated with intermediate- (10%-20% risk of FN) and low-risk (<10% risk of FN) chemotherapy regimens, respectively. Using a generalized estimating equation model, we found that enrollment in a health maintenance organization (HMO) was strongly associated with a lower adjusted odds of discretionary CSF use, compared with non-HMO patients (odds ratio = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.60, P < .001). All statistical tests were two-sided. Overall, 96% (95% CI = 93% to 98%) of CSFs were administered in scenarios where CSF therapy is not recommended by evidence-based guidelines. This finding suggests that policies to decrease CSF use in patients at lower or intermediate risk of FN may yield substantial cost savings without compromising patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21670423      PMCID: PMC3119647          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  14 in total

1.  Perspectives on the value of American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines as reported by oncologists and health maintenance organizations.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Mark R Somerfield; David G Pfister; Cecilia Tomori; Sofia Yakren; Peter B Bach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Robert H Fletcher; Mona N Fouad; David P Harrington; Katherine L Kahn; Catarina I Kiefe; Joseph Lipscomb; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold L Potosky; Dawn T Provenzale; Robert S Sandler; Michelle van Ryn; Robert B Wallace; Jane C Weeks; Dee W West
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  NCCN guidelines advocate wider use of colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  Caroline McNeil
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Myeloid growth factors. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

Authors:  Jeffrey Crawford; Betsy Althaus; James Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles Bennett; Douglas W Blayney; Spero R Cataland; David C Dale; George D Demetri; Harry P Erba; James Foran; Alison G Freifeld; Mark L Heaney; Sally Htoy; Dwight D Kloth; Gary H Lyman; Wells A Messersmith; Laura Boehnke Michaud; Sarah C Miyata; Amy Robbins; Martin S Tallman; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Peter Westervelt; Michael K Wong
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: comparison of the 1994 and 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology surveys regarding ASCO clinical practice guidelines. Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  C L Bennett; J A Weeks; M R Somerfield; J Feinglass; T J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Growth factor usage patterns and outcomes in the community setting: collection through a practice-based computerized clinical information system.

Authors:  G Swanson; K Bergstrom; E Stump; T Miyahara; E T Herfindal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Surveillance of colony-stimulating factor use in US academic health centers.

Authors:  J M Yim; K A Matuszewski; L C Vermeulen; T A Ratko; D A Burnett; P H Vlasses
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Development of a new head and neck cancer-specific comorbidity index.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Peter D Lacy; Arindam Basu; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-10

10.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Ryan M Tierney; Irene Costas; Lori Grove; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  44 in total

1.  Re: personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Jennifer L Malin; Benjamin Kim; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  A way forward on the medically appropriate use of white cell growth factors.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Uptake and economic impact of first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use during adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Elizabeth T Wilde; Jason D Wright; Donna L Buono; Kevin Kalinsky; Jennifer L Malin; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic colony stimulating factor: insights from a Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Scott A Strassels; Michael Dickson; Leann B Norris; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Can Appealing to Patient Altruism Reduce Overuse of Health Care Services? An Experimental Survey.

Authors:  Kevin R Riggs; Peter A Ubel; Brendan Saloner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Cancer care burden: aiming at the Achilles heel.

Authors:  S Ahmed; R K Shahid; K Gesy
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor.

Authors:  Derek Weycker; Xiaoyan Li; Spiros Tzivelekis; Mark Atwood; Jacob Garcia; Yanli Li; Maureen Reiner; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Are specialty drug prices destroying insurers and hurting consumers?: a number of efforts are under way to reduce price pressure.

Authors:  Stephen Barlas
Journal:  P T       Date:  2014-08

10.  The MASCC Neutropenia, Infection and Myelosuppression Study Group evaluates recent new concepts for the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prevention of febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Jean Klastersky; Harry Raftopoulos; Bernardo Rapoport
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.