Literature DB >> 32879369

Sylvian fissure development is linked to differential genetic expression in the pre-folded brain.

Arka N Mallela1, Hansen Deng1, Alyssa K Brisbin2, Alan Bush3, Ezequiel Goldschmidt4.   

Abstract

The mechanisms by which the human cerebral cortex folds into its final form remain poorly understood. With most of the current models and evidence addressing secondary folds, we sought to focus on the global geometry of the mature brain by studying its most distinctive feature, the Sylvian fissure. A digital human fetal brain atlas was developed using previously obtained MRI imaging of 81 healthy fetuses between gestational ages 21 and 38 weeks. To account for the development of the Sylvian fissure, we compared the growth of the frontotemporal opercula over the insular cortex and compared the transcriptome of the developing cortices for both regions. Spatiotemporal mapping of the lateral hemispheric surface showed the highest rate of organized growth in regions bordering the Sylvian fissure of the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes. Volumetric changes were first observed in the posterior aspect of the fissure moving anteriorly to the frontal lobe and laterally in the direction of the temporal pole. The insular region, delineated by the limiting insular gyri, expanded to a much lesser degree. The gene expression profile, before folding begins in the maturing brain, was significantly different in the developing opercular cortex compared to the insula. The Sylvian fissure forms by the relative overgrowth of the frontal and temporal lobes over the insula, corresponding to domains of highly expressed transcription factors involved in neuroepithelial cell differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32879369      PMCID: PMC7468287          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71535-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

The human cerebral cortex at birth has completed the formation of all major gyral and sulcal folds. The cerebral surface grows from a largely smooth surface beginning at the sixth month of gestation to the characteristic patterns of gyrification[1-10]. A number of hypotheses have been proposed on the mechanisms of preterm brain folding[11,12]. These include mechanical instability that can arise from the outer gray matter expanding at a faster rate than the underlying white matter, the axonal tension hypothesis in which white matter axons draw together overlying cortical regions to form gyri, and genetic prepatterning of the cortex to form convolutions[2,3,13,14]. Postnatally, cortical expansion continues through differential local growth that extend into adulthood, without altering the newborn’s brain folded outline[15]. With most of the current evidence focusing on the formation of intralobar folds, how the brain acquires its final global form is largely unknown, including the development of its most distinctive feature, the formation of the Sylvian fissure[2,3,5,13,16-18]. Observations of cortical development in preterm infants have shown that maximal directional growth occurs from the central sulcus toward the parietal lobe, then toward the frontal and temporal regions[19,20]. The normal process of cortical development follows a predictable sequence[21]. The Sylvian fissure, the deepest sulcus on the lateral hemispheric surface, can be identified as early as 12 weeks of gestation and serves as a major landmark for the dynamic changes of the brain surface. Abnormal morphologic features of the Sylvian fissure can be frequently associated with neuronal migration disorders[22,23]. The development of this prominent fold defines the global shape of the brain and cannot be explained by current models, which render aleatory sulci and gyri, with no distinctive and reproducible large scale structure[18]. The Sylvian fissure forms by the convergence of the frontal and temporal lobes over the insula, which is a distinctive and unique mechanism not shared by any other sulcus[24]. The characteristic radial migration pathway from the ventricular and subventricular zones, that forms most of the brain gyri, appears to be absent in the insula, which cells originate from the pallial/subpallial boundary and migrate in an oblique fashion around the basal ganglia[25]. In the present study, our goal is to evaluate the development of the Sylvian fissure as a result of asymmetric cortical growth between the frontoparietal and temporal opercula with respect to the insular cortex. Our hypothesis is that the convergence of the frontal and temporal opercula over the insula, driven by discrete regions of high growth, are responsible for the formation of the fissure and are associated with differential genetic expression patterns.

Results

Differential cortical expansion and convergence drives the formation of the Sylvian fissure

We calculated the local expansion (growth) of each area of the brain by registering each gestational week to the next one on a week by week basis. To determine local growth, we calculated the Jacobian determinant, which represents the local volumetric change (Fig. 1). This spatiotemporal mapping of the lateral hemispheres demonstrates early growth in the frontal, temporal, and parietal opercula, closing the Sylvian fissure from gestational weeks (GW) 23–25. Our analysis demonstrates that focal areas of cortical growth (volumetric expansion) and convergent growth of the opercula close the Sylvian fissure. In later weeks (GW 27–31) differential cortical expansion drives the formation of the major cortical sulci, progressing outward from the central sulcus in the frontal and parietal lobes and inferiorly in the temporal lobe. Although comparable, the left and right hemispheres exhibited asymmetric deformations and gained volume in similar places but at slightly different times, never exceeding 2 weeks of dyscoordination.
Figure 1

Volumetric changes on the lateral hemispheric surface during gestation. Spatiotemporal mapping of the lateral hemispheres. Blue–red color code indicates the Jacobian determinant of the week-to-week co-registration warping, a measure of local volume growth. The Jacobian determinant is normalized for global volume growth, as described in the methods. Postconceptional weeks are indicated. As can be observed, the highest rate of organized growth localizes to the opercula of insula. The first of these “hot zones” is located to the supramarginal gyrus, with the frontal and temporal poles increasing their local expansion at later times. The scale represents the weekly proportional growth (i.e. 1.1 represents a 10% weekly relative expansion). Note that week labels are gestational week (GW).

Volumetric changes on the lateral hemispheric surface during gestation. Spatiotemporal mapping of the lateral hemispheres. Blue–red color code indicates the Jacobian determinant of the week-to-week co-registration warping, a measure of local volume growth. The Jacobian determinant is normalized for global volume growth, as described in the methods. Postconceptional weeks are indicated. As can be observed, the highest rate of organized growth localizes to the opercula of insula. The first of these “hot zones” is located to the supramarginal gyrus, with the frontal and temporal poles increasing their local expansion at later times. The scale represents the weekly proportional growth (i.e. 1.1 represents a 10% weekly relative expansion). Note that week labels are gestational week (GW). Using the same registration described previously, we created a vector map demonstrating the magnitude and direction of local tissue displacements (Fig. 2). This analysis demonstrates the direction of tissue growth in contrast to the Jacobian analysis which demonstrates the degree of overall tissue growth. Only cortical regions exhibited high magnitude vectors whereas the telencephalic white matter rendered neutral or small deformation levels. Both the temporal and frontotemporal opercula converged over the insula, coinciding with volumetric growth described previously. Convergence of the frontal and temporal lobes over the insula led to the formation of the Sylvian fissure. Notably, no posteroventral folding or bending was observed. This was evident at every gestational age but diminished in magnitude as the gestation progressed (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Vector displacement during development. Week-to-week displacements, calculating local tissue displacement, after normalizing for volumetric growth, were calculated for each voxel. The magnitude (total displacement) is indicated by the white to red scale (black is shading from arrows) Axial, median and coronal views at the indicated postconceptional weeks are shown. High magnitude vectors are observed close to the evolving cortex but are sparse in the white matter. The frontoparietal and temporal opercula converge over the insular cortex that is ultimately covered by them forming the Sylvian fissure. The opercula correspond to areas of high relative growth consistently throughout gestation. Note that week labels are gestational week (GW).

Vector displacement during development. Week-to-week displacements, calculating local tissue displacement, after normalizing for volumetric growth, were calculated for each voxel. The magnitude (total displacement) is indicated by the white to red scale (black is shading from arrows) Axial, median and coronal views at the indicated postconceptional weeks are shown. High magnitude vectors are observed close to the evolving cortex but are sparse in the white matter. The frontoparietal and temporal opercula converge over the insular cortex that is ultimately covered by them forming the Sylvian fissure. The opercula correspond to areas of high relative growth consistently throughout gestation. Note that week labels are gestational week (GW).

Developmental gene expression

Cortical progenitors commonly form and migrate outward from the ventricular zone by using radial glial fibers as a scaffold. As a consequence, neurons born from the same progenitor area in the ventricular zone occupy neighboring positions in the mature cortex. This is, however, not true for the insular cortex, which neurons migrate obliquely from the pallial/subpallial boundary around the basal ganglia[25]. We therefore analyzed the transcriptomes of the maturing cortices of the areas of high growth (defined by the opercula outside the insular limiting sulci, target structure) and the insula (limited by the limiting insular sulci, contrast structure). We report the top 0.1% most overexpressed genes relative to the insula, for each cellular layer of interest: subpial granular zone (SZ), marginal zone (MZ), cortical plate (CP) and subcortical plate (SP) (Table 1).
Table 1

Genetic expression analysis.

LayerOMIM IDGene symbolFull nameChrFold changeFunctionPathological conditionsReferences
SG617314SH3YL1SH3 domain containing, Ysc84-like 1221.843Hair follicle development, meiosis, cell migration, and dorsal ruffle formationBlessing 2016, Hasegawa 2011
SG605012SUPT16HSuppressor of Ty 16 homolog1420.767Component of the FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) complex, a chromatin-specific factor required for transcription elongation as well as for DNA replication and repairBelotserkovskaya 2003
SG608788SOCS7Suppressor of cytokine signaling 71719.992Expressed at high levels in the nervous system at embryonic day 12.5 and in the cortical plate at embryonic day 15.5Hydrocephalus in mouse modelKrebs 2004
SG604522DEFA3Defensin, alpha 3, neutrophil-specific819.385Anti-HIV activity by directly inactivating HIV particlesMackewicz 2003
SG609842EDC3Enhancer of mRNA decapping 3 homolog1519.23Removal of the 5-prime cap from mRNA prior to its degradation from the 5-prime endMental retardation, autosomal rec. 50Fenger-Gron 2005, Ahmed 2015
SGN/AZNF563Zinc finger protein 5631918.768DNA Bindinghttps://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q8TA94
SG600981PGM5Phospho-glucomutase 5916.804Phosphotransferase involved in interconversion of glucose-1-phosphate and glucose-6-phosphateEdwards 1995
SG609518THAP7-AS1THAP7 antisense RNA 12216.626Binds to N-terminal histone tails of histones H3 and H4. Promotes deacetylation (repression)Macfarlan 2005
SGN/AIQUBIQ motif and ubiquitin domain containing716.172Ubiquitin proteinhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=IQUB
SG610519LOC146880Rho GTPase activating protein 27 pseudogene1715.708Involved in many cellular processes, inactive in the GDP-bound state and active in the GTP-bound statKatoh and Katoh 2004
SGN/AVSIG8115.628Immunoglobulin domainhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=VSIG8
SG603560SBF1SET binding factor 12214.732SBF1 acts as a protective factor that prevents substrate dephosphorylation, modulates growth controlCharcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 4B3Cui 1998, Nakhro 2013
SG609207MREGMelanoregulin214.473Melanocyte regulationO'Sullivan 2004
SG607753SMUG1Single-strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 11214.45Base excision repair—glycosylase that removes uracil from single- and double-stranded DNA in nuclear chromatinBoorstein 2001
SG614308FONG214.128UnknownKou 2011
SG609209IVNS1ABPInfluenza virus NS1A binding protein114.044Actin cytoskeletal stabilizationSasagawa 2002
SG601534KCNJ3Potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 3213.96Subunit of inward-rectifying potassium channelKennedy 1999
SG608214SCN3BSodium channel, voltage-gated, type III, beta subunit1113.792Subunit of voltage-sensitive sodium channelAtrial fibrillation (familial, type 16), Brugada syndrome 7Morgan 2000, Wang 2010, Hu 2009
MZ601038DIO3Deiodinase, iodothyronine, type III1439.355Deactivates T4/T3. Too high T4/3 can be deleterious to CNS developmentSalvatore 1995
MZ162660NTF3Neurotrophin 31227.893Thalamocortical connection formation, promotes the survival of, and induces neurite outgrowth from, a subset of neural crest and placode-derived neuronsKalcheim 1992, Ma 2002
MZN/AOR14C36Olfactory receptor, family 14, subf. C, member 36122.236Olfactory receptorhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=OR14C36
MZ300255OGTO-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) transferaseX22.162Single N-acetylglucosamine in O-glycosidic linkage to serine or threonine residuesMental retardation, X-linked 106Shafi 2000, Vaidyanathan 2017, Willems 2017
MZN/AOR11A1Olfactory receptor, family 11, subf. A, member 1618.384Olfactory receptorhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=OR11A1
MZ612176MYSM1Myb-like, SWIRM and MPN domains 1117.024Metalloprotease that targets monoubiquitinated histone H2A, a mark for epigenetic transcriptional repression and chromatin inaccessibilityBone marrow failure syndrome 4Panda 2015, Al Sultan 2013
MZ606198IRX2Iroquois homeobox 2516.821Pattern formation of vertebrate embryosBosse 1997
MZ606446SLAMF6SLAM family member 6116.416Expressed on NK cells and cooperate in the induction of NK cell activityBottino 2011
MZ602372ZANZonadhesin715.498Localizes to the anterior part of the sperm head and acts as a receptor to the zona pellucida matrix of the eggGasper and Swanson 2006
MZ162660NTF3Neurotrophin 31214.293Thalamocortical connection formation, promotes the survival of, and induces neurite outgrowth from, a subset of neural crest and placode-derived neuronsKalcheim 1992, Ma 2002
MZ605799AMNAmnionless homolog1413.684Encodes a type I transmembrane protein that is expressed exclusively in the extraembryonic visceral endoderm layer during gastrulationMegaloblastic anemia-1, Norwegian typeKalantry 2001
MZN/ACYB561D1Cytochrome b-561 domain containing 1112.995Cytochromehttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=CYB561D1
MZ609082FBXL16F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 161612.441Acts as protein-ubiquitin ligases. F-box proteins interact with SKP1 through the F box, and they interact with ubiquitination targetsJin 2004
MZ131550EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor711.919Involved in diverse cellular functions, including cell proliferation, differentiation, motility, and survival, and in tissue developmentInflammatory skin and bowel disease, neonatal, 2; lung cancerWang 2004
MZ114761CA5ACarbonic anhydrase VA, mitochondrial1611.394Encodes an intramitochondrial carbonic anhydrase, which is pivotal for providing bicarbonate (HCO3-) for multiple mitochondrial enzymesHyperammonemia due to carbonic anhydrase VA deficiencyvan Karnebeek 2014
MZ612185CASKIN2CASK interacting protein 21711.27Binds to CASK protein, neurexinsTabuchi 2002
MZN/ATRIM4Tripartite motif containing 4710.999Tripartite motif, localizes to cytoplasmhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=TRIM4
MZN/AOR10J3Olfactory receptor, family 10, subf. J, member 3110.3Olfactory receptorhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=OR10J3
MZN/ACSAG2CSAG family, member 2X10.177Associated with chondrosarcomahttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=CSAG2
MZN/AGRIP2Glutamate receptor interacting protein 239.362Interacts with Glutamate receptorhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=GRIP2
MZ609626MDGA1MAM domain containing glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchor 169.129GPI-anchored membrane proteinDe Juan 2002
MZN/AOR5B17Olfactory receptor, family 5, subf. B, member 17118.702Olfactory receptorhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=OR5B17
MZ607419GEMIN7Gem (nuclear organelle) associated protein 7198.537Assembly of small nuclear ribonuculeoproteins (snRNPs). Component of Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) ComplexBaccon 2002
MZ607971SLC6A15Solute carrier family 6 (neutral amino acid transporter), member 15128.475Sodium-coupled amino acid (neurotransmitter) transporterTakanaga 2005
MZ607407EBF3Early B-cell factor 3108.26Transcription factorHypotonia, ataxia, and delayed development syndrome (HADDS)Chao 2017, Harms 2017
MZ602767KRT85Keratin 85128.245Keratin, component of hair follicleEctodermal dysplasia, Type 4Naeem 2006
MZN/AZNF677Zinc finger protein 677198.192Zinc finger protein (hypothetical)https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=ZNF677
CP609730PDZRN4PDZ domain containing ring finger 4125.887UnknownKatoh 2004
CP602150SNAI2Snail homolog 285.137SNAI2 triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transitions and plays an important role in developmental processes, evolutionarily conservedWaardenburg syndrome type IIPerez-Mancera 2007; Sanchez-Martin 2002
CP607047ATXN3Ataxin 3144.983Exhibit deubiquitinase activity and appears to be a component of the ubiquitin proteasome system. It may also have roles in transcriptional regulation and neuroprotectionMachado-Joseph disease (spinocerebellar ataxia-3)Haacke 2006, Kawaguchi 1994
CP608896SGCGSarcoglycan, gamma (35 kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein)134.871The dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC) comprises a group of proteins that span the sarcolemma and bind actin to the extracellular matrix of muscle cellsMuscular dystrophy, limb-girdle, autosomal recessive 5Noguchi 1995, Piccolo 1996
CP603054GREM1Gremlin 1154.7Proposed to control diverse processes in growth and development by selectively antagonizing the activities of different subsets of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta ligandHsu 1998
CP162660NTF3Neurotrophin 3124.604Thalamocortical connection formation, promotes the survival of, and induces neurite outgrowth from, a subset of neural crest and placode-derived neuronsKalcheim 1992, Ma 2002
CP137141GABRA4Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor, alpha 444.453Posttranslational regulatory role of protein receptor GABRA4 subunit involved in GABAergic neurotransmissionMu 2002
CP123900EZREzrin64.069Scaffold between the actin cytoskeleton and transmembrane proteins facilitating cell–cell interactions and receptor retentionRoumier 2001
CP164860METMet proto-oncogene (hepatocyte growth factor receptor)73.883Cell-surface receptor for hepatocyte growth factorDeafness, autosomal recessive 97; Hepatocellular carcinomaBottaro 1991
CP615730DOCK7Dedicator of cytokinesis 713.86DOCK7 plays a role in priming 1 neurite to become the axonEpileptic encephalopathy, early infantile, 23Watabe-Uchida 2006, Perrault 2014
CP608789NCKAP5NCK-associated protein 523.858The NAP5 protein contains pro-rich sequences and a putative nuclear localization signal. NAP5 expression was detected in fetal and adult brain, leukocytes, and fetal fibroblastsMatuoka 1997
CP142622HPCAHippocalcin13.74Neuron-specific Ca(2+)-binding protein found in the retina and brainTakamatsu 1994
CP605790STK31Serine/threonine kinase 3173.707Encodes a putative protein kinase with a tudor domain, found in RNA-interacting proteins, and a coiled-coil domainWang 2001
CP610851AP1ARAdaptor-related protein complex 1 associated regulatory protein43.637Membrane protein, unknown functionSimpson 2000
CP612891LRRC8ELeucine rich repeat containing eight family, member E193.635UnknownKubota 2004
CP601642IL12RB2Interleukin 12 receptor, beta 213.521Expressed on Th1 and Th2 lymphocytesKim 2001
CPN/AOR4D6Olfactory receptor, family 4, subf. D, member 6113.48Olfactory receptorhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=OR4D6
CP606899CACNG7Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, gamma subunit 7193.359Component of voltage-gated calcium channelBurgess 2001
SP606198IRX2Iroquois homeobox 2530.2Pattern formation of vertebrate embryosBosse 1997
SP615388ADAT2Adenosine deaminase, tRNA-specific 2612.961Converts adenosine to inosine by hydrolytic deamination of genomically encoded adenosine on tRNAsGerber 1999
SP617922GYPAGlycophorin A411.829One of the most abundant red-cell proteins, with about 1 million copies of GYPA per red cell. SiaolomucinCooling 2015
SP607667CTNNA3Catenin (cadherin-associated protein), alpha 31011.647Cell adhesion molecule. In intercalated discs of the heart, CTNNA3 is a component of a unique hybrid adhering junction, or area compositaArrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, familial, 13Li 2012, van Hengel 2013
SP601724NEUROD1Neuronal differentiation 1210.769Generate functional neurons from human pluripotent stem cells as early as 6 days after transgene activationMaturity-onset diabetes of the young 6Naya 1995, Pang 2011, Malecki 1999
SP602830HIST1H4EHistone cluster 1, H4e68.564H4 Histone FamilyMarzluff 2002
SP601567LMAN1Lectin, mannose-binding, 1187.921May function as a molecular chaperone for the transport from ER to Golgi of a specific subset of secreted proteins, including coagulation factors V and VIIICombined factor V and VIII deficiencyNichols 1998
SP160740MYH2Myosin, heavy chain 2, skeletal muscle, adult177.796Encodes the myosin heavy chain isoform that is expressed in fast type 2A muscle fibersProximal myopathy and ophthalmoplegiaTajsharghi 2014
SP118493CHRM2Cholinergic receptor, muscarinic 277.455Shares structural features with other muscarinic receptors, including 7 transmembrane domains, an extracellular N terminus, and an intracellular C terminusPeralta 1987
SP600618ETV6Ets variant 6127.441May act as a tumor suppressor geneLeukemia, acute myeloid, somaticStegmaier 1995
SP608255TRAF3IP3TRAF3 interacting prot. 317.262interacted with the isoleucine zipper domain of Traf3 and activated JNKDadgostar 2003
SP607937NANOGNanog homeobox127.101Nanog is a critical factor underlying pluripotency in both ICM and ES cellsMitsui 2003
SP615717PLK1S1Polo-like kinase 1 substrate 1207.027Mediates mitotic chromosome stabilzationRetinitis Pigmentosa 69Oshimori 2006, El Shamieh 2014
SP615680CARD16Caspase recruitment domain fam., member 16117.001Caspase recruitment, apoptosisLee 2001
SPN/ALRRC70Leucine rich repeat containing 7057.001Unknownhttps://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=LRRC70
SP607512ADAMTS18ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 18166.925Zinc-dependent proteaseMicrocornea, myopic chorioretinal atrophy, and telecanthusAldahmesh 2013

Genes differentially expressed in the progenitor layers of the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes when compared to the insula at 15 weeks post-conception in the BrainSpan atlas (https://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=138322603) at the 99.9th percentile.

Ref: 2010 Allen Institute for Brain Science. BrainSpan Atlas of the Developing Human Brain[51].

SG subpial granular Zone, MZ marginal Zone, CP cortical plate, SP subplate.

Genetic expression analysis. Genes differentially expressed in the progenitor layers of the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes when compared to the insula at 15 weeks post-conception in the BrainSpan atlas (https://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=138322603) at the 99.9th percentile. Ref: 2010 Allen Institute for Brain Science. BrainSpan Atlas of the Developing Human Brain[51]. SG subpial granular Zone, MZ marginal Zone, CP cortical plate, SP subplate. We found extensive differences in the transcriptome for every region, which may indicate a different origin of the cells forming these structures and may drive their differing growth rates. In the subpial granular zone, the 0.1% relative highest expressed genes had a 13.7-fold (opercula/insula) expression ratio (Fig. 3A). Amongst these, the SH3YL1 gene (related to cellular migration) and the SOCS7 gene (related to hydrocephalus in mice) are involved in CNS development. In the marginal zone the cutoff was 8.2-fold (Fig. 3B). Among the genes overexpressed in the opercular regions related to brain growth, we found DIO3, which deactivates T4 to T3 conversion; NTF3, involved in the formation of thalamocortical connections and neurite growth and survival and IRX2, involved in developmental pattern formation. For the cortical plate the fold difference to reach the 0.1 percentile was 3.4 (Fig. 3C). Several of the most overexpressed genes in this region are involved in neuronal growth including SNAI2, related to epithelial mesenchymal transitions; ATXN3, related to transcriptional regulation and neuroprotection; GREM1, proposed to control development by selectively antagonizing the activities of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta ligand; NTF3; GABRA4, that regulates GABAergic activity and; EZR4, that acts as a scaffold between the actin cytoskeleton and transmembrane proteins facilitating cell–cell interactions and receptor retention and DOCK7, that plays a role in priming neurites to become the axons. For the subcortical plate the threshold for reporting was 6.9 (Fig. 3D) including IRX2 and NEUROD1, that generates functional neurons from human pluripotent stem cells.
Figure 3

Comparison of the genetic expression in the maturing cortex of the opercula and the insula at 21 post-conceptional weeks (GW 23). A marked difference between the transcriptome of cortical areas (frontal parietal, temporal opercula) and the insular cortex. This may drive the higher degree of expansion that was observed at every level of the maturing cortex [(A) subpial granular zone; (B) marginal zone; (C) cortical plate and (D) subplate]. M1 primary motor cortex, S1 primary somatosensory cortex, Lateral T/O lateral temporooccipital. Ref: 2010 Allen Institute for Brain Science. BrainSpan Atlas of the Developing Human Brain[51].

Comparison of the genetic expression in the maturing cortex of the opercula and the insula at 21 post-conceptional weeks (GW 23). A marked difference between the transcriptome of cortical areas (frontal parietal, temporal opercula) and the insular cortex. This may drive the higher degree of expansion that was observed at every level of the maturing cortex [(A) subpial granular zone; (B) marginal zone; (C) cortical plate and (D) subplate]. M1 primary motor cortex, S1 primary somatosensory cortex, Lateral T/O lateral temporooccipital. Ref: 2010 Allen Institute for Brain Science. BrainSpan Atlas of the Developing Human Brain[51].

Discussion

During the last two-thirds of gestation, the cerebral cortex expands and folds into a conserved arrangement of sulci and gyri[1-3,5]. The physical mechanisms by which the distinctive convoluted cortical pattern develops have been addressed in numerous publications[18-20]. Nevertheless, these models fail to account for the global geometry of the brain and do not explain the development of the Sylvian fissure[18-20]. Here, we found that the anterior and posterior poles of the telencephalic vesicle converge over the central region forming the frontal and temporal lobes, and the Insula, respectively. This process is triggered by the differential expansion of the fronto-temporal opercula very early during GW 23–25, preceding any bending process[22]. These two different regions exhibited a consistent difference in their transcriptomes in the pre-folded brain, with the temporal, frontal and parietal opercular cortices having consistent expression patterns that were different from that of the insula. We interrogated the BrainSpan Atlas to determine which genes are preferentially expressed in the developing cortices of the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes compared to the insular at 21 PCW, corresponding to gestation week (GW) 23. Given the lack of longitudinal data in the BrainSpan dataset, we were not able to determine the temporal sequence of transcriptional changes that lead to folding nor the specific pathways by which these transcriptional changes effect changes in growth. Per our analysis of the Gholipour atlas, the Sylvian fissure largely closes from 23 to 25 GW, suggesting that genetic expression immediately preceding this may drive this process. Further, while MRI changes may lag anatomic changes, the closure of the Sylvian fissure is a large-scale process that is clearly visible on fetal MRI (Fig. 1). Our aim was to identify transcriptional differences at the beginning of this period (week 21) that may drive this difference in growth pattern. Many of the overexpressed genes in the opercula have a well-defined or plausible role in neuronal migration or survival during development. SOCS7 is a protein coding gene that regulates signaling cascades and its involved in terminating neuronal migration[26]. Although the process is complex and incompletely understood, it is known that the complex SOCS7-Cul5-Rbx2 regulates termination of migration and disruption of that system results in abnormally position neurons in the CP[26]. Similarly, Neurotrophin 3 (NTF3), IRX2, and DOCK7, have roles in neuronal differentiation and survival. NTF3 controls the survival and differentiation of neurons and is thought to promote neuronal survival in the developing brain[27,28]. In contrast, while IRX2 does not have a defined role in telencephalic development, it is known to participate in the rostro caudal differentiation of the hindbrain[29]. DOCK7 codes for a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, which in turn activates Rac 1 and 3 and Rho amongst others.DOCK7 has a direct role in brain development by regulating the fate of the radial glia[30,31]. Mutations on this gene cause epileptic encephalopathy and cortical blindness[32]. Other proteins we identified do not have a clearly identified role (as of yet) in brain development. Ataxin 3 (ATX3) is involved in protein ubiquitination, a trinucleotide expansion of this gene (CAG) causes Machado-Joseph disease or spinocerebellar ataxia, although this mutation is associated with neuronal death, so far ATX does not have a well-defined role in brain development[33,34]. GREM1 codes for a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonist and can modulate organogenesis. In mouse it conveys the Sonic Hedgehog polarizing signal and is involved in limb development. A role in cortical folding has not been described[35]. Apart from the physical principles involved in brain folding, numerous reports evidenced that this process is under heavy genetic regulation[5,36-40]. Recently de Juan Romero et al. described a genetic patterning in the ferret’s VZ and outer ventricular zone (OVZ), matching the folded geometry of the brain and present before gyrification started. These differentially expressed genes (DEG) are composed of thousands of sequences that are expressed in an on and off fashion alternating between sulci and gyri, including Trnp1, Ccnd1, EOMES, Notch, Shh, MAPK and Wnt[17,39,40]. This pattern conforms a blueprint for individual folds but do not explain the large-scale arrangement of the brain lobes. A comparison between our findings and the DEGs described by de Juan Romero would be inaccurate; on one side they analyzed the ventricular and subventricular zones and not the cortices themselves; on the other, the mechanism involved in forming cortical convolutions in ferrets and humans are different and may be governed by different mechanisms[39,41,42]. The genetic expression at the pallial/subpallial boundary was described by Carney et al.[43]. This region is highly heterogeneous and expresses a mixed array of genes from the pallium (Pax6) and subpallium (Gsh2). Our findings suggest that the insular progenitor cells have a distinct transcriptional signature than the populations that develop into the frontal/temporal/parietal operculae. The latter expand at a much higher rate than the former, thus closing the Sylvian fissure on the lateral hemispheric surface. The work of de Juan Romero et al.[40] and Carney et al.[43] suggests that the insular progenitors may follow an oblique migration pathway in contrast to the direct radial migration pathway leading to the lateral hemispheric cortical surface (Fig. 4). The developing basal ganglia may block a direct pathway for progenitor cells in the ventricular zone to the insula. The distinct gyral configuration of the insula (5 relatively linear gyri that converge to the limen insulae) in contrast to the convoluted gyri of the lateral hemispheric surface may also be related to this[44]. Future studies must investigate the genetic makeup of these progenitor populations and how this drives the connectivity and morphology of the insula and operculae.
Figure 4

Different origins and migration paths explain the differences in growth between the insula and the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes and define the large-scale morphology of the human brain. Schematic of a 21 post-conceptional week (GW 23) brain. Radial migration from the ventricular zone (blue arrows) forms almost the entire lateral hemispheric cortical surface (blue) and is linked to the appearance of known sulci and gyri. On the other hand, the insular cortex (green) is isolated from periventricular proliferating zones by the basal ganglia and is formed by cells originating from the pallial-sub pallial boundary, defining an oblique migration pathway, which is linked with less expansion and morphologically distinct sulci.

Different origins and migration paths explain the differences in growth between the insula and the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes and define the large-scale morphology of the human brain. Schematic of a 21 post-conceptional week (GW 23) brain. Radial migration from the ventricular zone (blue arrows) forms almost the entire lateral hemispheric cortical surface (blue) and is linked to the appearance of known sulci and gyri. On the other hand, the insular cortex (green) is isolated from periventricular proliferating zones by the basal ganglia and is formed by cells originating from the pallial-sub pallial boundary, defining an oblique migration pathway, which is linked with less expansion and morphologically distinct sulci. The atlas developed by Gholipour et al. is derived from 81 healthy, normally-developing fetuses[45], while the gene expression data is derived from two 21 PCW (23 GW) fetuses as described in the BrainSpan documentation. It is important to note that the Gholipour atlas uses gestational week as a measure of time, which is approximately 2 weeks ahead of post-conceptional week. Thus, the genetic information from the BrainSpan Atlas corresponds to the very beginning of the Gholipour atlas. Although different individuals were used to construct both datasets, we argue that the genetic drivers of Sylvian fissure formation are highly conserved across individuals given the universal formation of the fissure in the healthy human brain. Our findings are limited by the small number of analyzed specimens, the use of bulk mRNA instead of single cell expression, and the difficulty of matching the time and spatial dimensions between a dataset generated from MRI and one constructed directly from fetal brain tissue. Given the ethical constraints in obtaining fetal brain tissue, the number of specimens available for genetic analysis is inherently limited. Further, given these same ethical limits, longitudinal imaging and genetic analysis is not possible in the same individual. Despite these constraints, this study deepens our understanding of the geometry and the transcriptome of the normal development of the Sylvian fissure.

Conclusion

The Sylvian fissure forms by the relative overgrowth of the frontal and temporal lobes over the insula, with the developing cortices exhibiting sharply different transcriptomes. It is interesting to note that some of these genes are related to neuronal proliferation and differentiation functions and can be part of the landscape of the genes responsible for the general geometry of the brain.

Methods

Guidelines statement

All data used in this analysis were obtained from publicly available databases that were obtained in accordance with all relevant guidelines and regulations. Specifically, for the fetal MRI atlas by Gholipour et al.[45] the study was approved by the Boston Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board and the Committee on Clinical Investigation and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. For the BrainSpan atlas, all work was performed following guidelines for the research use of human brain tissue of the University of Washington and Advanced Bioscience Resources (Alameda, California) with approval by the Human Investigation Committees and Institutional Ethics Committees of each institute.

Developmental MRI assessment

Atlas

We analyzed the fetal brain atlas described by Gholipour et al.[45,46]. This atlas was reconstructed from weekly fetal T2-weighted MRI images of 81 healthy fetuses from gestational week 21 to 38 segmented to identify multiple key subcortical and cortical regions. A description of the Atlas and its full content can be accessed at https://crl.med.harvard.edu/research/fetal_brain_atlas/.

Registration

To analyze fetal brain development over time, we utilized the SyN algorithm in the ANTs (Advanced Normalization Tools)[47] package to register the atlas fetal MRI on a week by week basis. This is a nonlinear, diffeomorphic registration paradigm. We performed two types of registration. First (part A), we registered images on a week-by-week basis (week 38 to week 37, week 37 to week 36, etc.) using the full SyN algorithm in the reverse direction. Second (Part B), in order identify nonlinear changes such as gyral growth or folding and ignore gross volumetric changes, we registered all weeks to week 38 using an affine transformation (performed using ANTs). Subsequently we performed nonlinear registration using SyN to identify these nonlinear changes.

Registration validation

In order to validate the accuracy of our registration, we warped the week 38 segmentation to the desired week using our registration method[45]. We then compared the overlap of the atlas segmentation for the desired week to the warped segmentation using the multiclass Dice similarity coefficient, as implemented in the Scikit-learn package in Python.

Jacobian analysis

To determine volumetric changes on a week by week basis, we calculated the Jacobian determinant of Part A registration described above (week-to-week) using ANTS. The Jacobian determinant is the determinant of the Jacobian matrix, a matrix of the first order partial derivatives of the transformation, and represents the local volumetric change associated with the transformation. A determinant greater than 1 represents expansion and vice versa. We used this to generate Jacobian maps for each week representing the relative volume expansion/contraction for each voxel for each week (after correcting for global scaling). Note that the Jacobian determinants are normalized for global volume change—e.g. if overall global volume growth was 9%, an area with Jacobian determinant of 0.95 still grew 3.5%. We rendered these maps in 2D and 3D using Nibabel, matplotlib, and nilearn, all publicly available Python packages[48,49].

Displacement maps

To visualize the direction and magnitude of local displacements, we rendered the normalized (part B), registration using arrow plots, which allow for visualization of local deformation[50]. In addition, we overlaid these plots with a heat map of the magnitude (total displacement) of each area. This was performed using Nibabel and matplotlib[50]. In the current study, the BrainSpan atlas was utilized to profile gene transcription at different stages of brain maturation. The BrainSpan atlas is an ARRA-funded grant through the NIH to a consortium consisting of the Allen Institute for Brain Science; Yale University; the University of Southern California; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging; the University of California, Los Angeles; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center[51]. All data are publicly accessible. The methods and processes used to generate gene expression data have been previously published and can be accessed via https://www.brainspan.org[51]. Postmortem human brain specimens were from the following: the Department of Neurobiology at Yale School of Medicine and the National Institute of Mental Health; the Human Fetal Tissue Repository at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine; the Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders at the University of Maryland; the Birth Defects Research Laboratory at the University of Washington; the MRC-Wellcome Trust Human Developmental Biology Resource at the Institute of Human Genetics, University of Newcastle, U.K. The protocol was approved by the respective IRBs. Informed consent was obtained. The BrainSpan Atlas sampled over 90 substructures in the developing brain, listed at https://help.brain-map.org/download/attachments/3506181/Prenatal_LMD_Microarray.pdf, building on the previous work by Kang et al.[7]. This includes the granular and dysgranular insular cortices (listed under “Neocortex” in Table 2 in the white paper at the link), and the surrounding opercular areas. Because the BrainSpan Atlas transcriptome is not referenced in the stereotactic space (it is provided in coronal slices), we defined the insula and operculae with anatomical landmarks visible both in the MRI dataset and the BrainSpan Atlas. The insula was defined as the cortical region within the limiting insular sulci, which corresponded to the dysgranular and granular insular cortices in the BrainSpan Atlas. We then identified substructures in the BrainSpan atlas that correspond to the superior (frontal and parietal lobe), and inferior (temporal) operculae. Note that not all substructures had transcriptomic data for all layers (subpial granular zone, marginal zone, cortical plate, subplate). The included opercular structures from the BrainSpan atlas were—frontopolar cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, orbital frontal cortex, primary motor cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, inferior parietal cortex, parainsular temporal cortex (e.g. auditory cortex), lateral temporooccipital cortex, and superior temporal cortex. We acknowledge that several of these structures span areas beyond the conventional definition of the operculae but given the parcellation from the BrainSpan atlas, we were limited to this. This is illustrated in Figs. 5 and 6.
Figure 5

Matching areas of relatively high and slow growth with their respective transcriptomes. In order to match anatomical areas on the MR with defined regions on the transcriptome reference atlas, we referenced our analyses to constant anatomical landmarks present in both. Based on the results rendered by the MR analysis, the area within the boundaries of the limiting insular gyri, with a low relative growth rate, was compared with the fast growing opercular cortices. From superficial to deep the developing cortical regions analyzed were the subpial granular zone (SG), the marginal zone (MZ), cortical plate (CP) and the subplate (SP). The dashed blue lines connect the insular limiting sulci, which were used as reference, since they are clearly demarcated both in the genomics atlas (A) as well as present in our MR analysis (B).

Figure 6

Locations of prenatal microarray profiling at PCW 21 (GW 23) and demarcations of cortical areas. Per the methodology described at the Allen Brain Atlas (https://help.brain-map.org/download/attachments/3506181/Prenatal_LMD_Microarray.pdf), the insula and surrounding operculae were specifically delineated and profiled. This figure highlights these areas—specifically for the insula (blue) and the frontal-parietal (superior—yellow) and temporal (inferior—green) operculae. The included structures from the BrainSpan atlas were—granular insular cortex, dysgranular insular cortex, frontopolar cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, orbital frontal cortex, primary motor cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, inferior parietal cortex, parainsular temporal cortex (e.g. auditory cortex), lateral temporooccipital cortex, and superior temporal cortex. (A) Surface illustration of the insula and operculae at PCW 21 (GW 23). The red squares indicate the locations of slices. (B) Coronal slices at indicated locations. These coronal slices are directly comparable to the BrainSpan atlas sections. Each region was sampled at as many as four layers—SG subpial granular zone, MZ marginal zone, CP cortical plate, SP subplate.

Matching areas of relatively high and slow growth with their respective transcriptomes. In order to match anatomical areas on the MR with defined regions on the transcriptome reference atlas, we referenced our analyses to constant anatomical landmarks present in both. Based on the results rendered by the MR analysis, the area within the boundaries of the limiting insular gyri, with a low relative growth rate, was compared with the fast growing opercular cortices. From superficial to deep the developing cortical regions analyzed were the subpial granular zone (SG), the marginal zone (MZ), cortical plate (CP) and the subplate (SP). The dashed blue lines connect the insular limiting sulci, which were used as reference, since they are clearly demarcated both in the genomics atlas (A) as well as present in our MR analysis (B). Locations of prenatal microarray profiling at PCW 21 (GW 23) and demarcations of cortical areas. Per the methodology described at the Allen Brain Atlas (https://help.brain-map.org/download/attachments/3506181/Prenatal_LMD_Microarray.pdf), the insula and surrounding operculae were specifically delineated and profiled. This figure highlights these areas—specifically for the insula (blue) and the frontal-parietal (superior—yellow) and temporal (inferior—green) operculae. The included structures from the BrainSpan atlas were—granular insular cortex, dysgranular insular cortex, frontopolar cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, orbital frontal cortex, primary motor cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, inferior parietal cortex, parainsular temporal cortex (e.g. auditory cortex), lateral temporooccipital cortex, and superior temporal cortex. (A) Surface illustration of the insula and operculae at PCW 21 (GW 23). The red squares indicate the locations of slices. (B) Coronal slices at indicated locations. These coronal slices are directly comparable to the BrainSpan atlas sections. Each region was sampled at as many as four layers—SG subpial granular zone, MZ marginal zone, CP cortical plate, SP subplate.

Comparative whole transcriptome analysis

We analyzed the transcriptional profile at 21 postconceptional weeks (PCW) available for a total of two specimens. We interrogated the atlas based on the result of the fetal MR analysis described above. We aimed to compare the expression profile of the developing cortex in areas of high growth with cortical regions exhibiting minimal relative expansion. The subpial granular zone (SZ), marginal zone (MZ), cortical plate (CP) and subcortical plate (SP) corresponding to the frontoparietal and temporal opercula were compared to the insula. A comparative search of genes consistently over expressed in the target regions (opercular cortex) compared to the contrast region (insular cortex) was performed. We report on the 99.9 highest expressed percentile of around 35,000 genes analyzed for each region, which selects the top 35 overexpressed genes in each area. The cut off (in folds) was 13.7 for the SG, 8.2 for the MZ, 3.4 for the CP and 6.9 for the SP.
  50 in total

1.  The protomap is propagated to cortical plate neurons through an Eomes-dependent intermediate map.

Authors:  Gina E Elsen; Rebecca D Hodge; Francesco Bedogni; Ray A M Daza; Branden R Nelson; Naoko Shiba; Steven L Reiner; Robert F Hevner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanics of cortical folding: stress, growth and stability.

Authors:  K E Garcia; C D Kroenke; P V Bayly
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  How Cells Fold the Cerebral Cortex.

Authors:  Víctor Borrell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spatial convergence of distant cortical regions during folding explains why arteries do not cross the sylvian fissure.

Authors:  Alan Bush; Maximiliano Nuñez; Alyssa K Brisbin; Robert M Friedlander; Ezequiel Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration.

Authors:  Brian B Avants; Nicholas J Tustison; Gang Song; Philip A Cook; Arno Klein; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Differential toxicity of ataxin-3 isoforms in Drosophila models of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3.

Authors:  Sean L Johnson; Jessica R Blount; Kozeta Libohova; Bedri Ranxhi; Henry L Paulson; Wei-Ling Tsou; Sokol V Todi
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Temporal slice registration and robust diffusion-tensor reconstruction for improved fetal brain structural connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Bahram Marami; Seyed Sadegh Mohseni Salehi; Onur Afacan; Benoit Scherrer; Caitlin K Rollins; Edward Yang; Judy A Estroff; Simon K Warfield; Ali Gholipour
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Mapping region-specific longitudinal cortical surface expansion from birth to 2 years of age.

Authors:  Gang Li; Jingxin Nie; Li Wang; Feng Shi; Weili Lin; John H Gilmore; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Explicit B-spline regularization in diffeomorphic image registration.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain.

Authors:  Jeremy A Miller; Song-Lin Ding; Susan M Sunkin; Kimberly A Smith; Lydia Ng; Aaron Szafer; Amanda Ebbert; Zackery L Riley; Joshua J Royall; Kaylynn Aiona; James M Arnold; Crissa Bennet; Darren Bertagnolli; Krissy Brouner; Stephanie Butler; Shiella Caldejon; Anita Carey; Christine Cuhaciyan; Rachel A Dalley; Nick Dee; Tim A Dolbeare; Benjamin A C Facer; David Feng; Tim P Fliss; Garrett Gee; Jeff Goldy; Lindsey Gourley; Benjamin W Gregor; Guangyu Gu; Robert E Howard; Jayson M Jochim; Chihchau L Kuan; Christopher Lau; Chang-Kyu Lee; Felix Lee; Tracy A Lemon; Phil Lesnar; Bergen McMurray; Naveed Mastan; Nerick Mosqueda; Theresa Naluai-Cecchini; Nhan-Kiet Ngo; Julie Nyhus; Aaron Oldre; Eric Olson; Jody Parente; Patrick D Parker; Sheana E Parry; Allison Stevens; Mihovil Pletikos; Melissa Reding; Kate Roll; David Sandman; Melaine Sarreal; Sheila Shapouri; Nadiya V Shapovalova; Elaine H Shen; Nathan Sjoquist; Clifford R Slaughterbeck; Michael Smith; Andy J Sodt; Derric Williams; Lilla Zöllei; Bruce Fischl; Mark B Gerstein; Daniel H Geschwind; Ian A Glass; Michael J Hawrylycz; Robert F Hevner; Hao Huang; Allan R Jones; James A Knowles; Pat Levitt; John W Phillips; Nenad Sestan; Paul Wohnoutka; Chinh Dang; Amy Bernard; John G Hohmann; Ed S Lein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Brain folding shapes the branching pattern of the middle cerebral artery.

Authors:  Diego E Shalom; Marcos A Trevisan; Arka Mallela; Maximiliano Nuñez; Ezequiel Goldschmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cadaveric White Matter Dissection Study of the Telencephalic Flexure: Surgical Implications.

Authors:  Pablo González-López; Giulia Cossu; Cynthia M Thomas; Jeffery S Marston; Cristina Gómez; Etienne Pralong; Mahmoud Messerer; Roy T Daniel
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.