| Literature DB >> 32876675 |
Liqiong Hu1, Hao Chen2, Xingliang Zhang3, Zhencheng Feng4, Haifeng Zhang5, Qingqi Meng4.
Abstract
Radiation-induced acute intestinal injury is a common and serious occurrence following abdominal and pelvic irradiation. The Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3)-dependant inflammasome and inflammation activation is crucial in this process. In a pre-experimental design of radiation-induced intestinal injury, we found that rosiglitazone inhibited caspase-1 which is a key marker of inflammasome activation. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the inhibitory effect of rosiglitazone on the NLRP3 inflammasome both in vivo and in vitro. Radiation-induced intestinal injury after rosiglitazone treatment, and the expression of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), caspase-1 and NLRP3 in a radiation-induced intestinal injury model in a rat and macrophages were observed. We found that rosiglitazone ameliorated radiation-induced intestinal injury in rats by suppressing the expression of caspase-1, NLRP3, IL-1β and TNF-α. Treatment with rosiglitazone in vitro reduced the expression of NLRP3, and the NLRP3 activator monosodium urate (MSU) reversed the inhibition of IL-1β and TNF-α by rosiglitazone in macrophages. MSU reversed the protective effect of rosiglitazone on radiation-induced intestinal injury in rats by reversing the rosiglitazone-induced inhibition of IL-1β and TNF-α. Taken together, these findings indicate that the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist, rosiglitazone, ameliorates radiation-induced intestine inflammation in rats via inhibiting the induction of the NLRP3-dependent inflammasome in macrophages.Entities:
Keywords: Rosiglitazone; TNF-α; inflammasome; inflammation; radiation-induced intestinal injury
Year: 2020 PMID: 32876675 PMCID: PMC7674707 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Radiat Res ISSN: 0449-3060 Impact factor: 2.724
Fig. 1.HE staining of rat small intestines. (A) control group; (B) irradiation (IR) 24 h post ABI; (B1) IR group 72 h post ABI; (C) IR + rosiglitazone group 24 h post ABI; (C1) IR + rosiglitazone group 72 hours post ABI. Each experiment was repeated three times.
Villus height and the number of crypts and inflammatory cells in each of the three groups. Results are given as mean ± SD; each experiment was repeated at least five times (one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons post hoc test)
| Villus height (height) | Number of crypts | Number of inflammatory cells (fold increase compared with control) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 377.43 ± 37.81 | 89.59 ± 10.30 | 1.00 ± 0.15 |
| Irradiation | 254.32 ± 29.62* | 22.35 ± 4.35* | 10.33 ± 0.77* |
| Rosiglitazone | 308.47 ± 31.25*,** | 48.21 ± 5.62*,** | 5.75 ± 0.42*,** |
* P < 0.05 vs control; **
P < 0.05 vs IR.
Fig. 2.The protein expression of caspase-1 and NLRP3, and the concentration of IL-1β and TNF-α in control, irradiation (IR) and IR + rosiglitazone (Rosi) groups. (A) IL -1β expression level; (B) representative western blots showing the effects of rosiglitazone on caspase-1 and NLRP3; (C) TNF-α expression level; (D) relative caspase-1 and NLRP3 protein level. Each experiment was repeated at least three times (one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons post test).
Fig. 3.Identification of macrophages using flow cytometry.
Fig. 4.The protein expression of NLRP3 and the concentration of IL-1β and TNF-α in control, MSU and rosiglitazone groups. (A) IL -1β expression level; (B) representative western blots showing the effects of rosiglitazone on NLRP3; (C) TNF-α expression level; (D) relative NLRP3 protein level. Each experiment was repeated at least three times (one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons post test).
Fig. 5.HE staining of rat small intestines 24 h post ABI. (A) Irradiation (IR) group; (B) rosiglitazone group; (C) rosiglitazone + MSU group. Each experiment was repeated three times.
Villus height, and the number of crypts and inflammatory cells in the irradiation, rosiglitazone and rosiglitazone + MSU groups. Each experiment was repeated at least five times (one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons post hoc test).
| Villus height | Number of crypts | Number of Inflammatory cells (fold increase vs control) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Irradiation | 257.44 ± 32.54 | 19.22 ± 3.21 | 1 ± 0.12 |
| Rosiglitazone | 332.58 ± 34.37* | 47.39 ± 5.87* | 0.11 ± 0.02* |
| Rosiglitazone + MSU | 271.61 ± 35.57** | 20.23 ± 2.75** | 1.12 ± 0.14** |
* P < 0.05 compared with control group;
** P < 0.05 compared with rosiglitazone group.
Fig. 6.The concentration of IL-1β and TNF-α in control, rosiglitazone and rosiglitazone + MSU groups. (A) IL -1β expression level; (B) TNF-α expression level. Each experiment was repeated at least three times (one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons post test).