Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek1, Vladimir Stevanovic2, Irena Tabain1, Ljiljana Betica-Radic3, Dario Sabadi4, Ljiljana Peric4, Maja Bogdanic1, Maja Vilibic5, Branko Kolaric6, Boris Kudumija7, Goranka Petrovic8, Anna Mrzljak9, Svjetlana Karabuva10, Irena Hrstic11, Krunoslav Capak12, Jasmina Kucinar13, Vladimir Savic14, Ljubo Barbic2. 1. Department of Virology, Croatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia. 2. Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases, General Hospital Dubrovnik, Dubrovnik, Croatia. 4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Clinical Hospital Center Osijek, Osijek, Croatia. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia. 6. Department of Public Health Gerontology, Andrija Stampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia. 7. B. Braun Avitum Polyclinic for Internal Medicine and Dialysis, Zagreb, Croatia. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Croatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia. 9. School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. 10. Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Center Split, Split, Croatia. 11. Department of Medicine, General Hospital Pula, Pula, Croatia. 12. Environmental Health Department, Croatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia. 13. Department of Serology and Immunology, Istria County Institute of Public Health, Pula, Croatia. 14. Laboratory for Virology and Serology, Croatian Veterinary Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dear Editor,Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory disease caused by severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). After the emergence of COVID-19 in
Wuhan (China) in December 2019, the number of global cases increased significantly, and
in March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared it a pandemic
. Human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 occurs primarily through close
contact and respiratory droplets. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies from
asymptomatic infection to severe and even fatal pneumonia
. Since the initial surveillance focused primarily on symptomatic COVID-19patients, the full spectrum of the disease or extent of mild or asymptomatic infection
not requiring medical attention was unclear. Statistical estimates of COVID-19 incidence
indicated that the number of asymptomatic cases was significant
. Healthcare personnel, particularly infectious disease and intensive care
physicians, emergency doctors, epidemiologists, microbiologists, nurses, and even
cleaning staff, have frequent direct or indirect exposure to patients or infected
materials. Estimation of asymptomatic and mild cases, including healthcare workers
(HCWs), is important for understanding COVID-19 transmission, providing insight into the
epidemic spread
.In Croatia, the first COVID-19 case was confirmed on February 25, 2020. A total of 3,272
cases and 113 deaths from COVID-19 were reported by July 7, 2020 (data of the Croatian
Institute of Public Health). To date, there are no data on the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2infection in healthcare settings. We analyzed the seroprevalence of COVID-19 in
different professionally exposed populations.From April 25 to May 24, 2020, when the COVID-19 epidemic curve was approaching the end
of the first wave in Croatia, a total of 592 serum samples from HCWs and
allied/auxiliary HCWs were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Convenient
samples were collected from six counties with a high incidence of COVID-19. WHO defined
HCWs as all people at healthcare facilities involved in the provision of care for
COVID-19patients as well as those who may not have provided direct care to patients but
may have come in contact with patients' body fluids, potentially contaminated materials
or devices, and equipment linked to patients or environmental surfaces
. The study group included: a) healthcare professionals working in different
hospital/emergency wards; b) laboratory personnel included in the phlebotomy and
SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic units; c) patient transporters; d) cleaning personnel; and e)
others (social workers, physical therapists, and administrative workers). All
participants included in the study filled out a questionnaire regarding their
demographic information, clinical symptoms, and possible exposure to COVID-19.Serum samples were initially screened for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies.
Reactive samples were further tested for IgM/IgA antibodies. Serological tests were
performed with a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using spike
glycoprotein (S) and nucleocapsid protein (N) antigens (Vircell, Granada, Spain). All
positive samples were confirmed using a virus neutralization test (VNT). For VNT, the
SARS-CoV-2 HR1/8933 was isolated in Vero E6 cells from the nasopharyngeal swab of a
COVID-19patient. Maximum cytopathic effect was visible on the 4th day, and
virus replication was confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR). Heat-inactivated serum samples (56°C/30 min) were tested in duplicate in
96-well plates. Two-fold serum dilutions starting from 1:2 were prepared and mixed with
the equal-volume (25 µL) suspension containing median tissue culture infectious dose
(100 TCID50) of the virus. After 1 h of incubation (37°C) in a CO2
incubator, a 50-µL suspension of Vero E6 cells (concentration: 2×105
cells/mL) was added to each well and incubated for 4 days. The antibody titer was
defined as the reciprocal value of the highest serum dilution that showed 100%
neutralization in at least half of the infected wells. Titers >8 were considered
positive.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Croatian Institute of
Public Health. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.Table 1 shows the characteristics of study
participants and potential risk exposures to COVID-19. The tested group included 152
(25.7%) men and 440 (74.3%) women, aged 20 to 65 years. As a possible risk factor, 116
(19.6%), 108 (18.2%), and 62 (10.5%) participants reported contact with a confirmed
COVID-19patient, participation in large community events, and travelling to areas with
documented COVID-19 transmission, respectively. Clinical symptoms consistent with
COVID-19 were reported by 300 (50.7%) participants. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was performed for
180 (30.4%) participants.
TABLE 1:
Epidemiological data and occupational exposure of study
participants.
Characteristic
N (%) tested
Sex
Male
152 (25.7%)
Female
440 (74.3%)
Travelling to an area with documented COVID-19
circulation
COVID-19: coronavirus disease; RT-PCR:
reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction;
SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2.Using ELISA, IgG and IgM/IgA antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 16 (2.7%) and
9 (1.5%) participants, respectively. Neutralizing antibodies were confirmed in 9 (1.5%)
participants (titers: 32 to 256). Five seropositive HCWs were also RT-PCR-positive. All
of them showed both IgG (antibody index [AI]: 17.08-37.31) and IgM/IgA (AI: 20.70-49.60)
antibodies with neutralizing antibody titers from 32 to 256. Seven seropositive persons
were healthcare professionals (medical doctor, nurses, and technicians), while two were
administrative workers. All but one HCW worked in the infectious disease department.
Three of them reported experiencing clinical symptoms in the past 2 months, while six
were asymptomatic.As of April 8, 2020, more than 22,000 cases of COVID-19 among HCWs from 52 countries have
been reported to WHO
. Using RT-PCR, the COVID-19 prevalence of 6% was found in HCWs at two Dutch
teaching hospitals (Breda and Tilburg). There was no clustering of infected HCWs in any
specific department
. Two studies from the United Kingdom showed that 18% of symptomatic HCWs
and 3% of asymptomatic HCWs tested RT-PCR-positive for SARS-CoV-2
.Data are limited on the seroprevalence of COVID-19 among HCWs. In this study, using
ELISA, SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were detected in 2.7% of participants, while
neutralizing antibodies were detected in 1.5% of participants, indicating a low
seroprevalence among HCWs in Croatia. Preliminary results from the Croatian Institute of
Public Health showed a slightly higher seroprevalence rate in the general population
(2.3%). While a positive ELISA result, even if specific, provides evidence of prior
infection with SARS-CoV-2, it does not ensure protective immunity, since neutralizing
antibodies correlate with protection. Screening with SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA (high
sensitivity) followed by VNT (high specificity) is a reliable approach for
seroepidemiological studies
.A seroprevalence study from Germany analyzed three groups of HCWs: a high-risk group with
daily contact to known/suspected COVID-19patients, an intermediate-risk group with
daily contact to patients without known/suspected COVID-19infection at admission, and a
low-risk group without patient contact. As in this study, the overall seroprevalence of
SARS-CoV-2 was low (1.6%). The seropositivity was higher in the intermediate-risk group
compared to the high-risk group (5.4% vs. 1.2%); however, this difference was not
statistically significant. Four of the five seropositive subjects reported experiencing
COVID-19-associated symptoms in the past 3 months
. Another study conducted in Barcelona found that 9.3% of 578 tested HCWs were
seropositive to SARS-CoV-2
. In the present study, three seropositive HCWs reported experiencing
COVID-19-consistent clinical symptoms, while six were asymptomatic.In conclusion, the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in healthcare facilities in Croatia is low,
indicating that protective measures have been effective. However, further large-scale
seroepidemiological studies are required to confirm this observation.
Authors: Johannes Korth; Benjamin Wilde; Sebastian Dolff; Olympia E Anastasiou; Adalbert Krawczyk; Michael Jahn; Sebastian Cordes; Birgit Ross; Stefan Esser; Monika Lindemann; Andreas Kribben; Ulf Dittmer; Oliver Witzke; Anke Herrmann Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Ranawaka Apm Perera; Chris Kp Mok; Owen Ty Tsang; Huibin Lv; Ronald Lw Ko; Nicholas C Wu; Meng Yuan; Wai Shing Leung; Jacky Mc Chan; Thomas Sh Chik; Chris Yc Choi; Kathy Leung; Kin Ho Chan; Karl Ck Chan; Ka-Chi Li; Joseph T Wu; Ian A Wilson; Arnold S Monto; Leo Lm Poon; Malik Peiris Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2020-04
Authors: Lucy Rivett; Sushmita Sridhar; Dominic Sparkes; Matthew Routledge; Nick K Jones; Ian G Goodfellow; Stephen Baker; Michael P Weekes; Sally Forrest; Jamie Young; Joana Pereira-Dias; William L Hamilton; Mark Ferris; M Estee Torok; Luke Meredith; Martin D Curran; Stewart Fuller; Afzal Chaudhry; Ashley Shaw; Richard J Samworth; John R Bradley; Gordon Dougan; Kenneth Gc Smith; Paul J Lehner; Nicholas J Matheson; Giles Wright Journal: Elife Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Alexander J Keeley; Cariad Evans; Hayley Colton; Michael Ankcorn; Alison Cope; Amy State; Tracy Bennett; Prosenjit Giri; Thushan I de Silva; Mohammad Raza Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2020-04
Authors: Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek; Ljubo Barbic; Anna Mrzljak; Dragan Brnic; Ana Klobucar; Maja Ilic; Natasa Janev-Holcer; Maja Bogdanic; Lorena Jemersic; Vladimir Stevanovic; Irena Tabain; Stjepan Krcmar; Marko Vucelja; Jelena Prpic; Marko Boljfetic; Pavle Jelicic; Josip Madic; Ivana Ferencak; Vladimir Savic Journal: Pathogens Date: 2021-01-15
Authors: Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek; Vladimir Stevanovic; Diana Brlek-Gorski; Ivana Ferencak; Thomas Ferenc; Magdalena Ujevic-Bosnjak; Irena Tabain; Natasa Janev-Holcer; Ivana Perkovic; Mario Anticevic; Barbara Bekavac; Bernard Kaic; Anna Mrzljak; Marin Ganjto; Ljiljana Zmak; Maja Mauric Maljkovic; Pavle Jelicic; Lovro Bucic; Ljubo Barbic Journal: Viruses Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Admire S Murongazvombo; Rachael S Jones; Michael Rayment; Nabeela Mughal; Berge Azadian; Hugo Donaldson; Gary W Davies; Luke Sp Moore; Alexander M Aiken Journal: Infect Prev Pract Date: 2021-06-22