| Literature DB >> 32874002 |
Mejo C Korah1, Junaid Rahman1, R Rajeswari1, Haja Sherief1, V Lalitha1, S Sengottavelu1, T Sivakumar2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study is to investigate the diuretic and antiurolithiatic activities of ethanolic leaf extract of Annona squamosa Linn. in experimental animals.Entities:
Keywords: Antiurolithiatic; diuretic; ethylene glycol; triterpenes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32874002 PMCID: PMC7446677 DOI: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_92_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 1.200
Effect of ethanolic leaf extract of Annona squamosa Linn. on diuretic index and Lipchitz value
| Groups | Treatments | Urine volume (ml/100 g/24 h) | Urinary pH | Diuretic index | Lipchitz value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Normal saline 5 (ml/kg) | 8.46±0.23 | 7.13±0.13 | - | - |
| Group II | Furosemide 20 (mg/kg) | 13.21±0.21** | 8.13±0.117** | 2.46 | - |
| Group III | EEAS 250 (mg/kg) | 9.85±0.19** | 8.08±0.122** | 1.80 | 0.74 |
| Group IV | EEAS 500 (mg/kg) | 11.91±0.28** | 8.53±0.098** | 2.18 | 0.90 |
Values are mean±SEM; n=6 in each group; **P<0.01when compared to normal control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test). ANOVA=Analysis of variance, SEM=Standard error of mean, EEAS= Ethanolic extract of annona squamosa
Effect of ethanolic leaf extract of Annona squamosa Linn. on natriuretic activity and index
| Groups | Treatment | Urinary electrolyte concentration (mEq/24 h) | Natriuretic activity (Na+/K+ ratio) | Natriuretic index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na+ | K+ | ||||
| Group I | Normal saline 5 (ml/kg) | 79.23±0.64 | 39.2±0.313 | 2.02 | - |
| Group II | Furosemide 5 (mg/kg) | 186.06±0.867** | 85.96±0.414** | 2.26 | 1.11 |
| Group III | EEAS 250 (mg/kg) | 153.35±0.922** | 74.16±0.30** | 2.06 | 1.01 |
| Group IV | EEAS 500 (mg/kg) | 178.76±0.569** | 80.35±0.076** | 2.19 | 1.08 |
Values are mean±SEM; n=6 in each group; **P<0.01when compared to normal control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test). ANOVA=Analysis of variance, SEM=Standard error of mean, EEAS= Ethanolic extract of annona squamosa
Effect of ethanolic leaf extract of Annona squamosa Linn. on urinary volume, urinary pH, and body weight in ethylene glycol-induced urolithiatic rats
| Groups | Urinary volume (ml/24 h) | Urinary pH | Body weight (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | |||
| Normal control | 8.03±0.33 | 7.1±0.129 | 150.32±1.45 | 164.66±1.11 |
| Negative control (EG) | 4.625±0.202a | 5.75±0.076a | 157.58±0.76 | 150.16±1.13a |
| Positive control (Cystone 750 mg/kg) | 8.31±0.139b | 7.5±0.09b | 161.62±1.2 | 168.16±0.87b |
| Test I (EEAS 250 mg/kg) | 6.58±0.060b | 6.75±0.66b | 169.54±1.14 | 172.83±0.477b |
| Test II (EEAS 500 mg/kg) | 7.98±0.094b | 7.43±0.143b | 169.21±3.3 | 176.12±0.47b |
Values are mean±SEM; n=6 in each group; aP<0.01 when compared to normal control; bP<0.01 when compared to urolithiatic control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test). EG=Ethylene glycol, ANOVA=Analysis of variance, SEM=Standard error of mean, EEAS= Ethanolic extract of annona squamosa
Figure 1Effect of ethanolic leaf extract of Annona squamosa Linn. on serum creatinine and uric acid in ethylene glycol-induced urolithiatic rats. Values are mean ± standard error of mean; n = 6 in each group; aP < 0.01 when compared to normal control; bP < 0.01 when compared to negative control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test)
Figure 2Effect of ethanolic leaf extract of Annona squamosa Linn. on urine (a) creatinine and urea, (b) calcium, and (c) uric acid in ethylene glycol-induced urolithiatic rats. Values are mean ± standard error of mean; n = 6 in each group; aP < 0.01 when compared to normal control; bP < 0.01 when compared to negative control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test)
Figure 3Effect of ethanolic leaf extract of Annona squamosa Linn. on kidney antioxidant parameters in ethylene glycol-induced urolithiatic rats. (a) Superoxide dismutase, glutathione and lipid hydroperoxidase. (b) Malondialdehyde. (c) Catalase
Figure 4Histopathological examination of the kidney. (a) Kidney section of normal rats which shows normal morphology of kidney tissues, (b) rat kidney section treated with ethylene glycol which shows the presence of calcium oxalate crystals with mild tubular injury and lymphocytic infiltration, (c) rat kidney section of Cystone (750 mg/kg) that shows similar morphology to normal rat kidney section and mild interstitial inflammation, (d) rat kidney treated with EEAS (250 mg/kg) which shows mild tubular injury and light congestion of blood vessels, (e) rat kidney treated with EEAS (500 mg/kg) that shows normal kidney tissue morphology and mild swelling of glomeruli