Literature DB >> 3287335

Diethyl pyrocarbonate can detect a modified DNA structure induced by the binding of quinoxaline antibiotics.

J Portugal1, K R Fox, M J McLean, J L Richenberg, M J Waring.   

Abstract

The reactivity of the 160 bp tyrT DNA fragment towards diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) has been investigated in the presence of bis-intercalating quinoxaline antibiotics and the synthetic depsipeptide TANDEM. At moderate concentrations of each ligand, specific purine residues (mainly adenosines) exhibit enhanced reactivity towards the probe, and several sites of enhancement appear to be related to the sequence selectivity of drug binding. Further experiments were performed with echinomycin at pH 5.5 and 4.6 to facilitate the protonation of cytosine required for formation of Hoogsteen GC base pairs. No significant increase in reactivity was observed under these conditions. Additionally, no protection of deoxyguanosine residues from methylation by dimethyl sulphate was observed in the presence of echinomycin. We conclude that the structural anomaly giving rise to drug-dependent enhanced DEPC reaction is not simply the formation of Hoogsteen base pairs adjacent to antibiotic binding sites. Nor is it due to a general unwinding of the double helix, since we show that conditions which are supposed to unwind the helix lead to a uniform increase in purine reactivity, regardless of the surrounding nucleotide sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3287335      PMCID: PMC336548          DOI: 10.1093/nar/16.9.3655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  29 in total

Review 1.  DNA structure and perturbation by drug binding.

Authors:  S Neidle; L H Pearl; J V Skelly
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1987-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Interactions of polynucleotides and thier components. I. Dissociation constants of the bases and their derivatives.

Authors:  J Clauwaert; J Stockx
Journal:  Z Naturforsch B       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 1.047

3.  Reaction of diethyl pyrocarbonate with nucleic acid components. Bases and nucleosides derived from guanine, cytosine, and uracil.

Authors:  A Vincze; R E Henderson; J J McDonald; N J Leonard
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1973-04-18       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  DNA modification and cancer.

Authors:  M J Waring
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  DNA structural variations in the E. coli tyrT promoter.

Authors:  H R Drew; A A Travers
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages.

Authors:  A M Maxam; W Gilbert
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Unwinding of double-stranded DNA helix by dehydration.

Authors:  C H Lee; H Mizusawa; T Kakefuda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chemical probes for higher-order structure in RNA.

Authors:  D A Peattie; W Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Does irehdiamine kink DNA?

Authors:  N Dattagupta; M Hogan; D M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Interaction between synthetic analogues of quinoxaline antibiotics and nucleic acids. Changes in mechanism and specificity related to structural alterations.

Authors:  J S Lee; M J Waring
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1978-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more
  15 in total

1.  Interaction of echinomycin with An.Tn. and (AT)n regions flanking its CG binding site.

Authors:  K Waterloh; K R Fox
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Sequence-selective binding of an ellipticine derivative to DNA.

Authors:  C Bailly; C OhUigin; C Rivalle; E Bisagni; J P Hénichart; M J Waring
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Chemical reactivity of matched cytosine and thymine bases near mismatched and unmatched bases in a heteroduplex between DNA strands with multiple differences.

Authors:  R G Cotton; R D Campbell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-06-12       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Unstable Hoogsteen base pairs adjacent to echinomycin binding sites within a DNA duplex.

Authors:  D E Gilbert; G A van der Marel; J H van Boom; J Feigon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Structural characterization of intrinsically curved AT-rich DNA sequences.

Authors:  P Carrera; F Azorín
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Localized chemical reactivity in DNA associated with the sequence-specific bisintercalation of echinomycin.

Authors:  C Bailly; D Gentle; F Hamy; M Purcell; M J Waring
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Hoogsteen base pairs increase the susceptibility of double-stranded DNA to cytotoxic damage.

Authors:  Yu Xu; Akanksha Manghrani; Bei Liu; Honglue Shi; Uyen Pham; Amy Liu; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Echinomycin binding to alternating AT.

Authors:  K R Fox; J N Marks; K Waterloh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Echinomycin binding to the sequence CG(AT)nCG alters the structure of the central AT region.

Authors:  K R Fox; E Kentebe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Site-specific intercalation at the triplex-duplex junction induces a conformational change which is detectable by hypersensitivity to diethylpyrocarbonate.

Authors:  D A Collier; J L Mergny; N T Thuong; C Helene
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.