BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of primary tumour location and clinical risk factors for long-term results of surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated in 636 patients. Patients were divided by tumour location (right-/left-sided colorectal cancer: RCRC/LCRC; rectal cancer), and age, gender, number and size of CLMs, type of liver surgery and interval from primary operation were evaluated. RESULTS: One-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS were independent of primary tumour location (p<0.59). CLM diameter was negatively associated with OS for the whole cohort (p<0.002), and RCRC (p<0.03) and LCRC (p<0.04) groups, as well as for RFS of those with LCRC (p<0.04). CLM number was negatively associated with RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0001), RCRC (p<0.02), LCRC (p<0.0001) and RC (p<0.02). Radiofrequency ablation and combined procedures led to worse OS for the whole cohort (p<0.03), and to worse RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0003) and for those with LCRC (p<0.03). A shorter interval between primary colorectal cancer surgery and CLMs procedure was risky for poor OS and RFS of patients with CLMs from RCRC (p<0.05), LCRC (p<0.05) and RC (p<0.02). CONCLUSION: Primary tumour location together with clinical risk factors are important for long-term results of surgery CLMs. Copyright
BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of primary tumour location and clinical risk factors for long-term results of surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated in 636 patients. Patients were divided by tumour location (right-/left-sided colorectal cancer: RCRC/LCRC; rectal cancer), and age, gender, number and size of CLMs, type of liver surgery and interval from primary operation were evaluated. RESULTS: One-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS were independent of primary tumour location (p<0.59). CLM diameter was negatively associated with OS for the whole cohort (p<0.002), and RCRC (p<0.03) and LCRC (p<0.04) groups, as well as for RFS of those with LCRC (p<0.04). CLM number was negatively associated with RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0001), RCRC (p<0.02), LCRC (p<0.0001) and RC (p<0.02). Radiofrequency ablation and combined procedures led to worse OS for the whole cohort (p<0.03), and to worse RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0003) and for those with LCRC (p<0.03). A shorter interval between primary colorectal cancer surgery and CLMs procedure was risky for poor OS and RFS of patients with CLMs from RCRC (p<0.05), LCRC (p<0.05) and RC (p<0.02). CONCLUSION:Primary tumour location together with clinical risk factors are important for long-term results of surgery CLMs. Copyright
Authors: Suguru Yamashita; Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Scott E Kopetz; Dipen Maru; Callisia N Clarke; Guillaume Passot; Claudius Conrad; Yun Shin Chun; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: John M Creasy; Eran Sadot; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Joanne F Chou; Mithat Gonen; Nancy E Kemeny; Vinod P Balachandran; T Peter Kingham; Ronald P DeMatteo; Peter J Allen; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Rene Warschkow; Michael C Sulz; Lukas Marti; Ignazio Tarantino; Bruno M Schmied; Thomas Cerny; Ulrich Güller Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 4.430