Literature DB >> 27464835

Better survival in right-sided versus left-sided stage I - III colon cancer patients.

Rene Warschkow1,2, Michael C Sulz3, Lukas Marti1, Ignazio Tarantino4, Bruno M Schmied1, Thomas Cerny5, Ulrich Güller6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The distinction between right-sided and left-sided colon cancer has recently received considerable attention due to differences regarding underlying genetic mutations. There is an ongoing debate if right- versus left-sided tumor location itself represents an independent prognostic factor. We aimed to investigate this question by using propensity score matching.
METHODS: Patients with resected, stage I - III colon cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2012). Both univariable and multivariable Cox regression as well as propensity score matching were used.
RESULTS: Overall, 91,416 patients (51,937 [56.8 %] with right-sided, 39,479 [43.2 %] with left-sided colon cancer; median follow-up 38 months) were eligible. In univariable analysis, patients with right-sided cancer had worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95 % CI:1.29-1.36, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.26, 95 % CI:1.21-1.30, P < 0.001) compared to patients with left-sided cancer. After propensity score matching, the prognosis of right-sided carcinomas was better regarding overall (HR = 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.89 - 0.94, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.90, 95 % CI:0.87 - 0.93, P < 0.001). In stage I and II, the prognosis of right-sided cancer was better for overall (HR = 0.89, 95 % CI:0.84-0.94 and HR = 0.85, 95 % CI:0.81-0.89) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.71, 95 % CI:0.64 - 0.79 and HR = 0.75, 95 % CI:0.70-0.80). Right- and left-sided colon cancer had a similar prognosis for stage III (overall: HR = 0.99, 95 % CI:0.95-1.03 and cancer-specific: HR = 1.04, 95 % CI:0.99-1.09).
CONCLUSIONS: This population-based analysis on stage I - III colon cancer provides evidence that the prognosis of localized right-sided colon cancer is better compared to left-sided colon cancer. This questions the paradigm from previous research claiming a worse survival in right-sided colon cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Left-sided; Right-sided; SEER; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27464835      PMCID: PMC4964057          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2412-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide. The incidence is estimated to be 1.2 million per annum, and more than 600 000 patients die from this cancer every year [1, 2], hence representing a relevant public health problem. Over the past years, the distinction between right-sided and left-sided colon cancer has been brought into focus due to several reasons: Recent studies have revealed an increased frequency of right-sided colon cancer over the past decade [3, 4], which prompted the investigation for potential reasons of variation by anatomic sites. As shown by a recent systematic review, many publications pointed out several differences between right-sided and left-sided colon cancer regarding epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathology, and genetic mutations [5]. It has been shown that patients with right-sided colon cancer were older, more often female, had more advanced tumor stages, increased tumor sizes, more often poorly differentiated tumors, and different molecular biological tumor patterns [4, 6–13]. Data regarding prognosis in right-sided versus left-sided colon cancer are conflicting, and it remains a matter of great debate whether tumor location itself has a significant prognostic impact. The majority of studies demonstrated a poorer survival in right-sided compared to left-sided colon cancer [14-18]. In contrast to those data, Weiss et al. [19] found no overall difference in 5-year mortality between right- and left-sided colon cancer after adjusting for various variables. The objective of the present population analysis of 91,416 colon cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was to compare overall and cancer-specific survival between two large, virtually identical groups of patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer using propensity-score matching.

Methods

Cohort definition: surveillance, epidemiology, and end results

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute in the United States, covering approximately 28 % of cancer cases in the United States were used for the present population-based analysis [20]. SEER data were collected and reported using data items and codes as documented by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) [21]. Primary cancer site and histology were coded according to criteria in the third edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3) and used to identify 246,390 patients with colon cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 [22]. Patients with cancer of the cecum and ascending colon were accounted for right-sided colon cancer and patients with cancer of the descending or sigmoid colon were accounted for left-sided colon cancer. Patients with cancer on other or unknown location of the cancer were excluded. Figure 1 depicts the selection process leaving 51,937 patients with right-sided and 39,479 patients with left-sided colon cancer for analysis.
Fig. 1

Flow chart of patients’ cohort definition. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute in the United States, covering approximately 28 % of cancer cases in the United States were used for the present population-based analysis. Primary cancer site and histology were coded according to criteria in the third edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3) and used to identify 246,390 patients with colon cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. The figure shows the selection process leaving 51,937 patients with right-sided and 39,479 patients with left-sided colon cancer for analysis

Flow chart of patients’ cohort definition. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute in the United States, covering approximately 28 % of cancer cases in the United States were used for the present population-based analysis. Primary cancer site and histology were coded according to criteria in the third edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3) and used to identify 246,390 patients with colon cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. The figure shows the selection process leaving 51,937 patients with right-sided and 39,479 patients with left-sided colon cancer for analysis

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical software (www.r-project.org). A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Chi-Square statistics were used to analyze proportions. After descriptive analysis, the impact of location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) on overall and cancer-specific survival was assessed by Cox regression analysis with and without risk-adjustment for tumor stage, T-stage, retrieval and positivity of regional lymph nodes, grading, histology, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), type of operation, year of diagnosis, age, gender, ethnicity, and marital status (risk set). Additionally, a backward variable selection procedure from the full Cox regression model based on the Akaike’s information criterion was performed. The proportional hazard assumption was tested by scaled Schoenfeld residuals and by inspection of the hazard ratio (HR) plots [23]. The imbalances regarding prognostic factors between patients with right-sided and left-sided colon cancer were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. To further adjust for these differences in baseline characteristics and hence further minimizing bias, a propensity score matched analysis was performed as a further statistical method for adjustment [24-26] using the “MatchIt” R package [27]. The propensity score matching was performed as a full bipartite weighting matching procedure [28] with stratification for year of diagnosis and tumor stage. In this procedure, each patient with left-sided colon cancer was matched to all possible patients with right-sided colon cancer, forming subclasses and assigning weights such that within each subclass both groups have similar covariate values. Patients with right-sided colon cancer without a counterpart among the patients with left-sided colon cancer and vice versa were excluded from this analysis. A multivariable logistic regression conditional on the subgroups obtained by the matching procedure was performed to assess the persisting bias. Thereafter, overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with right-sided and left-sided colon cancer were assessed in a Cox regression analysis using the weights and strata obtained by the matching propensity score analysis. Finally, the propensity score matching procedure was repeated separately for stage I, II, and III colon cancer.

Results

Patient characteristics

For the present investigation 91,416 of 246,390 patients diagnosed with colon cancer between 2004 and 2012 were included (Fig. 1). The mean follow up was 42.3 ± 30.5 months and the median follow-up was 38 months (IQR: 16 to 66 months). At the end of follow-up period, 66,082 (72.3 %) patients were alive, 13,507 (14.8 %) died from colon cancer and 11,827 (12.9 %) died due to other reasons. Overall, 51,937 (56.8 %) patients had right-sided colon cancer including 27,548 (30.1 %) patients with cancer of the cecum and 24,389 (26.7 %) patients with cancer of the ascending colon. Left-sided colon cancer was diagnosed in 39,479 (43.2 %) patients including 7039 (7.7 %) patients with cancer of the descending colon and 32,440 (35.5 %) patients with cancer of the sigmoid colon. Table 1 compares the patients’ characteristics for the two groups indicating relevant imbalances for all patients’ characteristics except for CEA-stage (P = 0.187). Patients with right-sided colon cancer had more advanced tumor stages, higher T-stages, had more regional lymph nodes retrieved, a higher grading, more often mucinous carcinomas, were more often Caucasian or African-American, were older, less often married, and were more often female (all P < 0.001).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Patient characteristics
TotalRight-sided carcinomaLeft-sided carcinomaPa
N = 91,416 N = 51,937 N = 39,479
Tumor stageStage I25,482 (27.9 %)13,864 (26.7 %)11,618 (29.4 %)<0.001
(AJCC 6th ed.)Stage II33,323 (36.5 %)19,965 (38.4 %)13,358 (33.8 %)
Stage III32,611 (35.7 %)18,108 (34.9 %)14,503 (36.7 %)
T-stageT114,110 (15.4 %)6415 (12.4 %)7695 (19.5 %)<0.001
T215,873 (17.4 %)9580 (18.4 %)6293 (15.9 %)
T351,416 (56.2 %)29,980 (57.7 %)21,436 (54.3 %)
T410,017 (11.0 %)5962 (11.5 %)4055 (10.3 %)
Number of positive058,805 (64.3 %)33,829 (65.1 %)24,976 (63.3 %)<0.001
regional lymph nodes110,557 (11.5 %)5627 (10.8 %)4930 (12.5 %)
2–310,531 (11.5 %)5672 (10.9 %)4859 (12.3 %)
4–66560 (7.2 %)3692 (7.1 %)2868 (7.3 %)
7+4963 (5.4 %)3117 (6.0 %)1846 (4.7 %)
Number of retrieved<12 lymph nodes24,256 (26.5 %)10,243 (19.7 %)14,013 (35.5 %)<0.001
regional lymph nodes12–16 lymph nodes26,123 (28.6 %)14,917 (28.7 %)11,206 (28.4 %)
17+ lymph nodes41,037 (44.9 %)26,777 (51.6 %)14,260 (36.1 %)
GradingG18568 (9.4 %)4721 (9.1 %)3847 (9.7 %)<0.001
G264,221 (70.3 %)34,812 (67.0 %)29,409 (74.5 %)
G314,228 (15.6 %)9886 (19.0 %)4342 (11.0 %)
G41490 (1.6 %)1099 (2.1 %)391 (1.0 %)
Unknown2909 (3.2 %)1419 (2.7 %)1490 (3.8 %)
HistologyAdenocarcinoma64,760 (70.8 %)35,637 (68.6 %)29,123 (73.8 %)<0.001
Adeno-Ca in adenomatous polyp6791 (7.4 %)2885 (5.6 %)3906 (9.9 %)
Adeno-Ca in villous adenoma2646 (2.9 %)1721 (3.3 %)925 (2.3 %)
Adeno-Ca in tubulovillous adenoma8142 (8.9 %)4897 (9.4 %)3245 (8.2 %)
Mucinous carcinoma9077 (9.9 %)6797 (13.1 %)2280 (5.8 %)
CEAC0-stage32,999 (36.1 %)18,679 (36.0 %)14,320 (36.3 %)0.185
C1-stage17,232 (18.9 %)9896 (19.1 %)7336 (18.6 %)
Unknown/Borderline41,185 (45.1 %)23,362 (45.0 %)17,823 (45.1 %)
OperationSegmental resection36,201 (39.6 %)7750 (14.9 %)28,451 (72.1 %)<0.001
Hemi/subtotal colectomy54,241 (59.3 %)43,777 (84.3 %)10,464 (26.5 %)
Other974 (1.1 %)410 (0.8 %)564 (1.4 %)
Year2004 to 200631,514 (34.5 %)17,703 (34.1 %)13,811 (35.0 %)0.005
2007 to 200931,314 (34.3 %)17,798 (34.3 %)13,516 (34.2 %)
2010 to 201228,588 (31.3 %)16,436 (31.6 %)12,152 (30.8 %)
AgeUp to 49 years8015 (8.8 %)3175 (6.1 %)4840 (12.3 %)<0.001
50 to 64 years26,347 (28.8 %)12,344 (23.8 %)14,003 (35.5 %)
65 to 79 years35,693 (39.0 %)21,435 (41.3 %)14,258 (36.1 %)
80+ years21,361 (23.4 %)14,983 (28.8 %)6378 (16.2 %)
GenderMale43,981 (48.1 %)23,053 (44.4 %)20,928 (53.0 %)<0.001
Female47,435 (51.9 %)28,884 (55.6 %)18,551 (47.0 %)
EthnicityCaucasian72,937 (79.8 %)42,296 (81.4 %)30,641 (77.6 %)<0.001
African-American10,572 (11.6 %)6286 (12.1 %)4286 (10.9 %)
Other/Unknown7907 (8.6 %)3355 (6.5 %)4552 (11.5 %)
Marital statusMarried49,901 (54.6 %)27,219 (52.4 %)22,682 (57.5 %)<0.001
Single11,581 (12.7 %)6120 (11.8 %)5461 (13.8 %)
Widowed17,770 (19.4 %)11,835 (22.8 %)5935 (15.0 %)
Other/Unknown12,164 (13.3 %)6763 (13.0 %)5401 (13.7 %)

All data shown as n (%)

AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer, T-stage tumor stage, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen

aChi-Square test

Patient characteristics All data shown as n (%) AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer, T-stage tumor stage, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen aChi-Square test

Impact of cancer location on survival

The observed 5-year overall survival rate for patients with right-sided colon cancer was 65.1 % (95 % CI: 64.6 to 65.6 %) compared with 72.1 % (95 % CI: 71.5 to 72.6 %) for patients with left-sided colon cancer. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate for patients with right-sided colon cancer was 79.8 % (95 % CI: 79.4 to 80.2 %) compared with 82.9 (95 % CI: 82.5 to 83.4 %) for patients with left-sided colon cancer (Fig. 2). Table 2 depicts the prognostic value of cancer side and the other patient’s characteristics on adjusted and unadjusted overall and cancer-specific mortality. In unadjusted analysis, right-sided colon cancer was associated with a significantly increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio of death [HR] = 1.32, 95 % CI: 1.29 to 1.36, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.26, 95 % CI: 1.21 to 1.30, P < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, patients with right-sided colon cancer had a significantly worse overall (HR = 1.05, 95 % CI: 1.02 to 1.09, P < 0.001) but a similar cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.99 to 1.08, P = 0.156) compared to patients with left-sided colon cancer. A backward variable selection procedure from the full Cox regression model confirmed a significantly increased risk for overall (HR = 1.05, 95 % CI: 1.02 to 1.09, P < 0.001) but not for cancer-specific mortality.
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier curves for overall and cancer-specific survival. Panel (a and b) depict the overall and cancer-specific survival in the original data set and panel (c and d) the overall and cancer-specific survival after propensity score matching. The number of colon cancer patients at risk are given below each plot

Table 2

Prognostic factors for overall and cancer-specific mortality

Cox regression for overall survivalCox regression for cancer-specific survival
Unadjusteda Adjustedb Unadjusteda Adjustedb
HR (95 % CI) p c HR (95 % CI) p c HR (95 % CI) p c HR (95 % CI) p c
Cancer sideLeft-sidedReference<0.001Reference0.002Reference<0.001Reference0.156
Right-sided1.32 (1.29–1.36)1.05 (1.02–1.09)1.23 (1.19–1.27)1.03 (0.99–1.08)
Tumor stageStage IReference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
(AJCC 6th ed.)Stage II1.65 (1.59–1.71)1.40 (1.35–1.45)3.00 (2.81–3.20)2.47 (2.31–2.65)
Stage III2.34 (2.26–2.42)2.30 (2.22–2.39)6.41 (6.02–6.81)5.79 (5.42–6.18)
Number of retrieved<12Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
Regional lymph12–160.90 (0.87–0.92)0.82 (0.79–0.84)0.92 (0.88–0.96)0.78 (0.75–0.82)
Nodes17+0.75 (0.73–0.77)0.69 (0.67–0.72)0.81 (0.78–0.84)0.66 (0.64–0.69)
GradingG1Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
G21.20 (1.14–1.26)1.05 (1.00–1.10)1.46 (1.36–1.56)1.10 (1.03–1.18)
G31.76 (1.67–1.85)1.28 (1.21–1.35)2.60 (2.41–2.81)1.51 (1.40–1.64)
G42.02 (1.83–2.22)1.50 (1.36–1.66)2.88 (2.53–3.27)1.69 (1.49–1.93)
Unknown0.91 (0.84–1.00)1.04 (0.95–1.14)1.03 (0.91–1.18)1.20 (1.06–1.37)
HistologyAdenocarcinomaReference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
Adenocarcinoma in adenomatous polyp0.53 (0.50–0.56)0.80 (0.76–0.86)0.36 (0.33–0.40)0.71 (0.64–0.79)
Adenocarcinoma in villous adenoma0.77 (0.71–0.83)0.93 (0.86–1.01)0.62 (0.55–0.70)0.92 (0.82–1.03)
Adenocarcinoma in tubulovillous adenoma0.63 (0.60–0.67)0.84 (0.80–0.89)0.44 (0.40–0.47)0.73 (0.67–0.79)
Mucinous carcinoma1.12 (1.08–1.17)1.03 (0.99–1.07)1.14 (1.08–1.20)1.05 (0.99–1.10)
CEAC0-stageReference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
C1-stage1.91 (1.84–1.97)1.61 (1.56–1.67)2.29 (2.19–2.40)1.79 (1.71–1.87)
Unknown/Borderline1.42 (1.38–1.46)1.37 (1.33–1.41)1.49 (1.43–1.55)1.48 (1.42–1.54)
OperationSegmental resectionReference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
Hemi/subtotal colectomy1.27 (1.24–1.30)1.08 (1.05–1.12)1.26 (1.22–1.31)1.11 (1.06–1.16)
Other1.32 (1.18–1.48)1.34 (1.19–1.50)1.66 (1.44–1.91)1.57 (1.36–1.81)
Year2004 to 2006Reference<0.001Reference0.258Reference<0.001Reference0.542
2007 to 20090.93 (0.91–0.96)1.02 (0.99–1.05)0.93 (0.89–0.96)1.02 (0.98–1.06)
2010 to 20120.87 (0.83–0.90)0.98 (0.94–1.03)0.87 (0.83–0.92)0.99 (0.94–1.05)
AgeUp to 49 yearsReference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
50 to 64 years1.14 (1.07–1.22)1.20 (1.12–1.28)0.94 (0.87–1.01)1.04 (0.97–1.13)
65 to 79 years2.18 (2.05–2.33)2.30 (2.15–2.45)1.37 (1.28–1.47)1.57 (1.45–1.69)
80+ years5.15 (4.83–5.49)5.10 (4.77–5.45)2.69 (2.50–2.89)2.88 (2.66–3.11)
GendermaleReference0.614Reference<0.001Reference0.001Reference<0.001
female1.01 (0.98–1.03)0.75 (0.73–0.77)1.06 (1.02–1.09)0.84 (0.81–0.87)
EthnicityCaucasianReference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
African-American1.03 (0.99–1.07)1.17 (1.13–1.22)1.19 (1.13–1.25)1.24 (1.18–1.30)
Other/Unknown0.70 (0.67–0.74)0.77 (0.73–0.81)0.81 (0.76–0.87)0.83 (0.78–0.89)
Marital statusMarriedReference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001Reference<0.001
Single1.32 (1.27–1.37)1.46 (1.40–1.52)1.40 (1.33–1.47)1.41 (1.33–1.48)
Widowed2.21 (2.15–2.28)1.42 (1.37–1.46)1.91 (1.84–1.99)1.34 (1.28–1.40)
Other/Unknown1.25 (1.20–1.30)1.28 (1.23–1.33)1.21 (1.15–1.28)1.19 (1.13–1.26)

Hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (Wald type)

The number of positive regional lymph nodes and T-stage were excluded from analysis to avoid collinearity with stage

AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen

aUnivariate Cox regression analysis, bmultivariable Cox regression analysis full model, clikelihood ratio tests

Kaplan-Meier curves for overall and cancer-specific survival. Panel (a and b) depict the overall and cancer-specific survival in the original data set and panel (c and d) the overall and cancer-specific survival after propensity score matching. The number of colon cancer patients at risk are given below each plot Prognostic factors for overall and cancer-specific mortality Hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (Wald type) The number of positive regional lymph nodes and T-stage were excluded from analysis to avoid collinearity with stage AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen aUnivariate Cox regression analysis, bmultivariable Cox regression analysis full model, clikelihood ratio tests

Adjusting for patients characteristics with propensity score matching

To further assess whether the colon cancer location has an independent prognostic impact on survival, a bipartite propensity score matching analysis with stratification for stage and year of diagnosis was performed. The rationale for this analysis were the significant imbalances of baseline characteristics in multivariable logistic regression between patients with left- and right-sided colon cancer for all confounders (P < 0.001) except for the year of diagnosis (P = 0.285) and the marital status (P = 0.877, Table 3).
Table 3

Imbalances of baseline characteristics between right- and left-sided colon cancer patients

Logistic regression in raw data (N = 91,4166)a Patient characteristics after stratified bipartite propensity score matching (N = 90,067)c
OR (95 % CI)Pb TotalRight-sided carcinomaLeft-sided carcinomaPb
N = 90,067 N = 51,331 N = 38,736
Tumor stageStage ID)24,924 (27.7 %)13,622 (26.5 %)11,302 (29.2 %)E)
(AJCC 6th ed.)Stage II33,002 (36.6 %)19,790 (38.6 %)13,212 (34.1 %)
Stage III32,141 (35.7 %)17,919 (34.9 %)14,222 (36.7 %)
T-stageT1Reference<0.00111387.4 (12.6 %)6378 (12.4 %)5009.4 (12.9 %)0.908
T21.45 (1.36–1.55)17213.6 (19.1 %)9360 (18.2 %)7853.6 (20.3 %)
T31.15 (1.08–1.22)50984.6 (56.6 %)29,704 (57.9 %)21280.6 (54.9 %)
T41.08 (1.00–1.17)10481.4 (11.6 %)5889 (11.5 %)4592.4 (11.9 %)
Number of positive0Reference<0.00157,926 (64.3 %)33,412 (65.1 %)24,514 (63.3 %)0.733
Regional lymph10.82 (0.78–0.87)10303.2 (11.4 %)5579 (10.9 %)4724.2 (12.2 %)
Nodes2–30.82 (0.77–0.86)9909.2 (11.0 %)5631 (11.0 %)4278.2 (11.0 %)
4–60.87 (0.81–0.93)6433.9 (7.1 %)3650 (7.1 %)2783.9 (7.2 %)
7+0.94 (0.86–1.01)5494.7 (6.1 %)3059 (6.0 %)2435.7 (6.3 %)
Number of retrieved<12Reference<0.00118327.7 (20.3 %)10,240 (19.9 %)8087.7 (20.9 %)0.931
Regional lymph12–161.72 (1.64–1.80)25,713 (28.5 %)14,813 (28.9 %)10,900 (28.1 %)
Nodes17+2.44 (2.33–2.55)46026.3 (51.1 %)26,278 (51.2 %)19748.3 (51.0 %)
GradingG1Reference<0.0018274.1 (9.2 %)4667 (9.1 %)3607.1 (9.3 %)0.954
G20.97 (0.91–1.02)60851.4 (67.6 %)34,630 (67.5 %)26221.4 (67.7 %)
G31.74 (1.62–1.87)16543.4 (18.4 %)9599 (18.7 %)6944.4 (17.9 %)
G41.92 (1.64–2.24)1738.2 (1.9 %)1035 (2.0 %)703.2 (1.8 %)
Unknown0.92 (0.82–1.03)2659.8 (3.0 %)1400 (2.7 %)1259.8 (3.3 %)
HistologyAdenocarcinomaReference<0.00162172.7 (69.0 %)35,607 (69.4 %)26565.7 (68.6 %)0.978
Adeno-Ca in adenomatous polyp0.95 (0.89–1.02)5139.1 (5.7 %)2883 (5.6 %)2256.1 (5.8 %)
Adeno-Ca in villous adenoma2.02 (1.82–2.25)2901.7 (3.2 %)1664 (3.2 %)1237.7 (3.2 %)
Adeno-Ca in tubulovillous adenoma1.73 (1.62–1.85)8333.5 (9.3 %)4806 (9.4 %)3527.5 (9.1 %)
Mucinous carcinoma2.23 (2.10–2.37)11,520 (12.8 %)6371 (12.4 %)5149 (13.3 %)
CEAC0-stageReference<0.00131640.5 (35.1 %)18,476 (36.0 %)13164.5 (34.0 %)0.763
C1-stage0.88 (0.83–0.92)17236.6 (19.1 %)9804 (19.1 %)7432.6 (19.2 %)
Unknown/Borderline1.00 (0.96–1.04)41189.8 (45.7 %)23,051 (44.9 %)18138.8 (46.8 %)
OperationSegmental resectionReference<0.00113557.3 (15.1 %)7750 (15.1 %)5807.3 (15.0 %)0.447
Hemi/subtotal colectomy14.3 (13.8–14.8)75781.8 (84.1 %)43,171 (84.1 %)32610.8 (84.2 %)
Other2.66 (2.32–3.05)727.9 (0.8 %)410 (0.8 %)317.9 (0.8 %)
Year2004 to 2006Reference0.28531,052 (34.5 %)17,527 (34.1 %)13,525 (34.9 %)E)
2007 to 20090.97 (0.93–1.01)30,869 (34.3 %)17,585 (34.3 %)13,284 (34.3 %)
2010 to 20120.97 (0.93–1.01)28,146 (31.3 %)16,219 (31.6 %)11,927 (30.8 %)
AgeUp to 49 yearsReference<0.0015545.6 (6.2 %)3174 (6.2 %)2371.6 (6.1 %)0.995
50 to 64 years1.56 (1.46–1.66)21581.8 (24.0 %)12,332 (24.0 %)9249.8 (23.9 %)
65 to 79 years2.65 (2.49–2.83)37577.3 (41.7 %)21,253 (41.4 %)16324.3 (42.1 %)
80+ years4.08 (3.80–4.39)25362.3 (28.2 %)14,572 (28.4 %)10790.3 (27.9 %)
GendermaleReference<0.00140730.6 (45.2 %)22,954 (44.7 %)17776.6 (45.9 %)0.570
female1.30 (1.26–1.35)49336.4 (54.8 %)28,377 (55.3 %)20959.4 (54.1 %)
EthnicityCaucasianReference<0.00172714.5 (80.7 %)41,771 (81.4 %)30943.5 (79.9 %)0.050
African-American1.09 (1.04–1.15)11763.1 (13.1 %)6213 (12.1 %)5550.1 (14.3 %)
Other/Unknown0.66 (0.62–0.70)5589.4 (6.2 %)3347 (6.5 %)2242.4 (5.8 %)
Marital statusMarriedReference0.87747284.7 (52.5 %)27,005 (52.6 %)20279.7 (52.4 %)0.930
Single0.98 (0.93–1.03)10609.8 (11.8 %)6044 (11.8 %)4565.8 (11.8 %)
Widowed1.00 (0.95–1.05)20331.9 (22.6 %)11,580 (22.6 %)8751.9 (22.6 %)
Other/Unknown0.99 (0.94–1.05)11840.6 (13.1 %)6702 (13.1 %)5138.6 (13.3 %)

aMultivariable logistic regression with the odds ratio (OR) for right-sided carcinomas in the original raw data set (N = 91,416)

AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, T-stage tumor stage, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen

bLikelihood ratio tests

cAfter full bipartite propensity score matching with stratification for year of diagnosis and tumor stage, a multivariable conditional logistic regression based on the subgroups obtained by the matching procedure was performed. No significant bias was observed for cancer side

1349 patients were excluded because of lacking counterpart in the other group

Weighted matching causes decimals for the number of patients in the group with left-sided cancer

D)Excluded to avoid collinearity with the number of positive regional lymph nodes

E)No statistical test because propensity score matching was stratified for year of diagnosis and tumor stage

Imbalances of baseline characteristics between right- and left-sided colon cancer patients aMultivariable logistic regression with the odds ratio (OR) for right-sided carcinomas in the original raw data set (N = 91,416) AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, T-stage tumor stage, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen bLikelihood ratio tests cAfter full bipartite propensity score matching with stratification for year of diagnosis and tumor stage, a multivariable conditional logistic regression based on the subgroups obtained by the matching procedure was performed. No significant bias was observed for cancer side 1349 patients were excluded because of lacking counterpart in the other group Weighted matching causes decimals for the number of patients in the group with left-sided cancer D)Excluded to avoid collinearity with the number of positive regional lymph nodes E)No statistical test because propensity score matching was stratified for year of diagnosis and tumor stage Before the matching procedure, the propensity score for patients with left-sided colon cancer was 0.346 ± 0.268 compared to 0.739 ± 0.220 in patients with right-sided colon cancer (P < 0.001), thus indicating a strong and clinically relevant bias regarding the observed patient and tumor characteristics in the two groups. After the matching procedure, the propensity score was virtually the same in the two groups (0.738 ± 0.220 compared to 0.739 ± 0.220, P = 0.622), thus indicating no persisting relevant bias regarding the observed characteristics in the two groups (Table 3). Of the entire cohort, 1349 patients were excluded enabling a propensity score matching in the remaining 90,067 patients. In this cohort, the prognosis of right-sided colon cancer was slightly better compared to left-sided colon cancer regarding overall (HR = 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.89 to 0.94, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.90, 95 % CI: 0.87 − 0.93, P < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate for patients with right-sided colon cancer was 65.5 % (95 % CI: 65.0 to 66.0 %) compared with 63.0 % (95 % CI: 62.5 to 63.6 %) for patients with left-sided colon cancer. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate for patients with right-sided colon cancer was 79.8 % (95 % CI: 79.4 to 80.2 %) compared with 77.8 % (95 % CI: 77.3 to 78.3 %) for patients with left-sided colon cancer.

Stratified stage-wise analysis

Motivated by an unsuspected better survival in right-sided cancer, a propensity score matched analysis was performed for each stage individually confirming a better prognosis for stage I and II right-sided colon cancer (Fig. 3). In the stage I subgroup, the prognosis of right -sided colon cancer was better regarding overall (HR = 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.84–0.94, P < 0.001)) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.71, 95 % CI: 0.64–0.79, P < 0.001)). In the stage II subgroup, the prognosis of right- sided colon cancer was better regarding overall (HR = 0.85, 95 % CI: 0.81–0.89, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.70 to 0.80, P < 0.001). In the stage III subgroup, the prognosis of right- and left-sided colon cancer was similar regarding overall (HR = 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.95–1.03, P = 0.497) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.99–1.09, P = 0.129).
Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier curves for overall and cancer-specific survival after stratified propensity score matching. Panels (a, c, and e) depict the overall survival and panels (b, d, and f) depict the cancer-specific survival for stage I (panels a and b), stage II (panels c and d), and stage III (panels e and f). The number of colon cancer patients at risk are given below each plot

Kaplan-Meier curves for overall and cancer-specific survival after stratified propensity score matching. Panels (a, c, and e) depict the overall survival and panels (b, d, and f) depict the cancer-specific survival for stage I (panels a and b), stage II (panels c and d), and stage III (panels e and f). The number of colon cancer patients at risk are given below each plot The overall five year survival rates for right-sided cancers in stage I, II, and III were 77.4 % (95 % CI: 76.6 to 78.2 %) 68.3 % (95 % CI: 67.6 to 69.1 %), and 53.3 % (95 % CI: 52.5 to 54.2 %) compared to 74.9 % (95 % CI: 74 to 75.8 %), 63.9 % (95 % CI: 63 to 64.8 %), and 52.9 % (95 % CI: 51.9 to 53.8 %) in left-sided carcinomas. The cancer-specific survival rates for right-sided cancers in stage I, II, and III were 94.0 % (95 % CI: 93.6 to 94.5 %), 84.6 % (95 % CI: 84.1 to 85.3 %), and 63.6 % (95 % CI: 62.8 to 64.5 %) compared to 91.7 % (95%CI: 91.1 to 92.3 %), 80.1 % (95 % CI: 79.3 to 80.9 %), and 64.6 % (95 % CI: 63.7 to 65.6 %) in left-sided carcinomas (Fig. 3).

Discussion

Currently, data regarding the prognosis of right-sided versus left-sided colon cancer are conflicting, however, most studies revealed a poorer survival in right-sided primary tumor location [14–18, 29]. To our knowledge this is the first population-based, propensity score adjusted analysis investigating the prognostic impact of tumor location in non-metastatic colon cancer patients. Being aware of the conflicting data and also of the challenges to handle relevant bias due to substantial imbalances regarding baseline characteristics between right- and left-sided colon cancer patients, we have intentionally selected the propensity score matching as a further statistical method in addition to common multivariate analysis to minimize confounding. In the present analysis, the cohort was partitioned into subgroups containing one or more patients with right-sided colon cancer who were matched to one or more patients with left-sided colon cancer with similar values on the observed covariates in the risk set (bipartite matching). Hence, the main difference between the compared groups in propensity-score matching was the location of the colon cancer (left versus right). The advantage of the propensity score adjusted analysis over multivariate analysis becomes evident from varying results in our study, showing that multivariate analysis is obviously limited in adjusting factors in large retrospective population-based studies. Based on a large collective of 91,416 patients with stage I - III colon cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2012, this is the first study providing evidence that the prognosis of patients with right-sided colon cancer in the overall population of stage I – III is similar or even better after adjusting for a strong bias regarding various patient and tumor characteristics by the use of propensity score matching. We thus conclude that the differences in the prognosis between right-sided and left-sided colon cancer patients described in the scientific literature are not real but caused by differences regarding confounders that could not be completely adjusted for in multivariate regression analysis. Our results differ from the findings published by Weiss et al. [19] demonstrating no 5-year overall survival difference between right- and left-sided colon cancer after adjusting for multiple variables. Weiss et al. [19] analyzed 53,801 colon cancer patients aged 65 years and older from the linked SEER-Medicare database between 1992 and 2005. Interestingly, they found that stage II right-sided colon cancer had lower mortality compared to patients with a left-sided tumor (HR 0.92; 95 % CI, 0.87–0.97, P = 0.001), while stage III right-sided colon cancer patients had higher mortality than those with left-sided colon cancer (HR, 1.12; 95 % CI, 1.06 to 1.18; P < 0.001) [19]. The present analysis differs from the study by Weiss and colleagues [19] regarding several issues: First, in our investigation patients were included if older than 18 years of age. The majority of patients with colon cancer are usually older persons, however, 37.4 % of all patients in our analysis were younger than 64 years. In our opinion it is key to include younger colon cancer patients as this is a subgroup, which has been shown to dramatically increase in the past decade [30]. Second, we used more recent data from 2004 to 2012 as opposed to the study by Weiss and colleagues (1992–2005) [19]. Finally, while the investigation by Weiss et al. [19] exclusively used conventional multivariable analysis to adjust for imbalances between patients with right - versus left-sided colon cancer, the present investigation used propensity score matching as an additional statistical tool in addition to multivariable analyses. One limitation of the present study is the lack of information regarding microsatellite instability (MSI) in the SEER database. According to the literature, colon cancer with MSI have a better prognosis [31, 32]. Furthermore, the frequency of MSI is different between right- and left-sided colon cancers and differs also between different tumor stages. One study estimated that the rate of MSI-positive stage II right-sided colon cancers is 25 %, compared to less than 15 % in stage III right-sided cancers [33]. Weiss et al. [19] argued that this difference might contribute to their results showing better prognosis of stage II right-sided cancers. Unfortunately, data on sporadic mismatch repair deficiency, germeline-mutation prompted Lynch Syndrom, BRAF/KRAS/NRAS mutations, or any family history can not be ascertained from the SEER data. Hence, the fraction of patients with these specific subtypes of colon cancer – which are known to vary between the left and right colon side [13]  - are unknown in the present study. However, due to the population-based nature of this analysis  that mirrors the real US population with colon cancer, the lack of this information does not impact our results, albeit limits the extent of interpretation of our data. Overall, the existing literature shows conflicting data regarding prognosis in right-sided vs. left-sided colon cancer. It is difficult to compare the available studies due to various differences, e.g. in study design and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Suboptimal adjusting of confounders seems to be the major difficulty to obtain a thorough analysis regarding the prognostic impact of tumor location, pointing out the strength of our study with further adjustment by propensity score matching. Our investigation provides evidence that right-sided tumour location itself is associated with improved prognosis compared to the left-sided colon cancer, mostly due to better prognosis in stage I and stage II patients. We would like to acknowledge the limitations of the present study. First, information regarding chemotherapeutic treatments of patients can not be ascertained from the SEER data. Second, information on comorbidities, performance status and data regarding family history are also not available in the SEER database. To which extent these parameters might have influenced the analysis remains unclear. Third, while we did risk-adjust for known confounders, potential bias due to unknown confounding cannot be excluded. Unobserved confounders represent a relevant limitation to the generalizability of the propensity score method. Finally, although propensity-score adjustment represents an additional, valuable statistical tool used in the present analyses, the results must be interpreted with some caution due to a fraction of unmatched patients.

Conclusions

This population-based propensity score adjusted analysis on stage I - III colon cancer provides evidence that the prognosis of patients with right-sided colon cancer is better compared to left-sided colon cancer mostly due to a better survival in stage I and stage II patients. This finding questions the paradigm of worse survival in right-sided colon cancer patients claimed by the majority of previous research.

Abbreviations

AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; IQR, interquartile ratio; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; T-stage, tumor stage
  27 in total

Review 1.  Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Authors:  M M Joffe; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  C-KI-RAS activation and the biological behaviour of proximal and distal colonic adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  J Elnatan; H S Goh; D R Smith
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Variations in demography and prognosis by colon cancer location.

Authors:  Kristoffer Derwinger; Bengt Gustavsson
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Microsatellite instability: impact on cancer progression in proximal and distal colorectal cancers.

Authors:  P Jernvall; M J Mäkinen; T J Karttunen; J Mäkelä; P Vihko
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  The impact of tumor location on the histopathologic expression of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P Papagiorgis; I Oikonomakis; I Karapanagiotou; S D Wexner; N Nikiteas
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Comparison of 17,641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival.

Authors:  Frank Benedix; Rainer Kube; Frank Meyer; Uwe Schmidt; Ingo Gastinger; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Colon cancer in France: evidence for improvement in management and survival.

Authors:  C Faivre-Finn; A-M Bouvier-Benhamiche; J M Phelip; S Manfredi; V Dancourt; J Faivre
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control--a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States).

Authors:  Phyllis A Wingo; Patricia M Jamison; Robert A Hiatt; Hannah K Weir; Paul M Gargiullo; Mary Hutton; Nancy C Lee; H Irene Hall
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 9.  Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Barry Iacopetta
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Relationship of nuclear DNA content to clinicopathologic features in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Lanza; I Maestri; M R Ballotta; A Dubini; L Cavazzini
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  66 in total

1.  Better survival of right-sided than left-sided stage II colon cancer: a propensity scores matching analysis based on SEER database.

Authors:  Shuanhu Wang; Xinxin Xu; Jiajia Guan; Rui Huo; Mulin Liu; Congqiao Jiang; Wenbin Wang
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Clinical and prognostic differences between surgically resected right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Koji Fukata; Norihiro Yuasa; Eiji Takeuchi; Hideo Miyake; Hidemasa Nagai; Yuichiro Yoshioka; Kanji Miyata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Prognostic significance of primary tumor sidedness in patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Emily K Elizabeth McCracken; Gregory P Samsa; Deborah A Fisher; Norma E Farrow; Karenia Landa; Kevin N Shah; Dan G Blazer; Sabino Zani
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Survival After Curative Resection in Patients with Colon Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matching Studies.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ishizuka; Takayuki Shimizu; Norisuke Shibuya; Kazutoshi Takagi; Hiroyuki Hachiya; Yusuke Nishi; Kotaro Suda; Taku Aoki; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-10-21

5.  The distribution of lymph node metastases and their size in colon cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Yamaoka; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa; Akinobu Furutani; Shoichi Manabe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Adjuvant therapy for stages II and III colon cancer: risk stratification, treatment duration, and future directions.

Authors:  U Bender; Y S Rho; I Barrera; S Aghajanyan; J Acoba; P Kavan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Daily Intake of High-Fat Diet with Lysophosphatidic Acid-Rich Soybean Phospholipids Augments Colon Tumorigenesis in Kyoto Apc Delta Rats.

Authors:  Toshihiko Tsutsumi; Manami Inoue; Yoko Okamoto; Akira Ishihara; Akira Tokumura
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Clinical characteristics and prognosis of different primary tumor location in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  C Zheng; F Jiang; H Lin; S Li
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Left Versus Right: Does Location Matter for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients in Phase 1 Clinical Trials?

Authors:  Sukeshi Patel Arora; Norma S Ketchum; Joel Michalek; Jonathon Gelfond; Devalingam Mahalingam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-09

10.  Long-term Results of Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Terms of Primary Tumour Location and Clinical Risk Factors.

Authors:  Vladislav Treska; Martin Skala; Kristyna Prochazkova; Aneta Svejdova; Tereza Petrakova; Jakub Sebek; Ivan Riha; Jachym Rosendorf; Robert Polak; Tomas Skalicky; Vaclav Liska
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.