Literature DB >> 32871752

In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a New Transparent Collagen-based Wound Membrane for Tissue Regeneration in Different Clinical Indications.

Stevo Najman1,2, Mike Barbeck3,4, Ole Jung5, Milena Radenkovic6, Sanja Stojanović6, Caroline Lindner7, Milijana Batinic4, Oliver Görke4, Jens Pissarek8, Annica Pröhl7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: For the treatment of different tissue defects such as jawbone defects, open wound defect, chronic ulcers, dura mater defects and corneal defects, different biomaterials are available. The use of collagen-based materials for these applications has been significantly increased over the past decades due to its excellent biocompatibility and degradability. However, no transparent collagen-based biomaterial is available until now. Thus, a newly developed transparent collagen membrane (TCM) based on natural derived porcine pericardium, which offers numerous application possibilities, was developed. The present study aimed to analyze the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility using established methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new TCM membrane and a commercially available collagen membrane (CM, Jason membrane, botiss biomaterials GmbH, Zossen, Germany) were tested for its in vitro cytocompatibility. Furthermore, the in vivo biocompatibility was analyzed using sham operations as control group. In vitro, cytocompatibility was tested in accordance with EN ISO 10993-5/-12 regulations and Live-Dead-stainings. In vivo, a subcutaneous implantation model in BALB/c mice was used and explants were prepared for analyses by established histological, immunohistochemical and histomorphometrical methods.
RESULTS: In vitro, both membranes showed promising cytocompatibility with a slightly better direct cell response in the Live-Dead staining assay for the TCM. In vivo, TCM induced a comparable inflammatory immune response after 10 and 30 days with comparable numbers of M1- and M2-macrophages as also found in the control group without biomaterial insertion.
CONCLUSION: The newly transparent collagen membrane is fully biocompatible and is supporting safe clinical application in tissue repair and surgery. Copyright
© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collagen membrane; inflammatory tissue response; transparency; wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32871752      PMCID: PMC7652521          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  22 in total

Review 1.  Collagen as an implantable material in medicine and dentistry.

Authors:  Maria G Patino; Mirdza E Neiders; Sebastiano Andreana; Bernice Noble; Robert E Cohen
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Daniel Rothamel; Frank Schwarz; Anton Sculean; Monika Herten; Werner Scherbaum; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Collagen synthesis and mineralization in the early phase of distraction bone healing.

Authors:  M Vauhkonen; J Peltonen; E Karaharju; K Aalto; I Alitalo
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1990-09

Review 4.  Collagen for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Ana Marina Ferreira; Piergiorgio Gentile; Valeria Chiono; Gianluca Ciardelli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system resorb implanted bone matrix: a histologic and ultrastructural study.

Authors:  M E Holtrop; K A Cox; J Glowacki
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Optimized in vitro procedure for assessing the cytocompatibility of magnesium-based biomaterials.

Authors:  Ole Jung; Ralf Smeets; Dario Porchetta; Alexander Kopp; Christoph Ptock; Ute Müller; Max Heiland; Max Schwade; Björn Behr; Nadja Kröger; Lan Kluwe; Henning Hanken; Philip Hartjen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo effects of a decellularized xenogeneic collagen scaffold in nasal cartilage repair.

Authors:  Alexander Florian Elsaesser; Christian Bermueller; Silke Schwarz; Ludwig Koerber; Roman Breiter; Nicole Rotter
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Induction of multinucleated giant cells in response to small sized bovine bone substitute (Bio-Oss™) results in an enhanced early implantation bed vascularization.

Authors:  M Barbeck; S E Udeabor; J Lorenz; A Kubesch; J Choukroun; R A Sader; C J Kirkpatrick; S Ghanaati
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

9.  In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Tadas Korzinskas; Ole Jung; Ralf Smeets; Sanja Stojanovic; Stevo Najman; Kristina Glenske; Michael Hahn; Sabine Wenisch; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Improved In Vitro Test Procedure for Full Assessment of the Cytocompatibility of Degradable Magnesium Based on ISO 10993-5/-12.

Authors:  Ole Jung; Ralf Smeets; Philip Hartjen; Reinhard Schnettler; Frank Feyerabend; Martin Klein; Nils Wegner; Frank Walther; Dominic Stangier; Anders Henningsen; Carsten Rendenbach; Max Heiland; Mike Barbeck; Alexander Kopp
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  4 in total

1.  In Vitro Analysis of the Cytocompatibility of a Novel Porcine Aortic Patch for Vascular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sven Pantermehl; Said Alkildani; Elisa Meyer; Ignacio Stowe; Jens Pissarek; Pia Moosmann; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  In Vitro and Ex Vivo Analysis of Collagen Foams for Soft and Hard Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck; L U Fan; Fabian Korte; Cuifeng Zhao; Rumen Krastev; Sven Pantermehl; Xin Xiong
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Absorbable Artificial Dura Versus Nonabsorbable Artificial Dura in Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Two Centers.

Authors:  Zhong-Ding Zhang; Li-Yan Zhao; Yi-Ru Liu; Jing-Yu Zhang; Shang-Hui Xie; Yan-Qi Lin; Zhuo-Ning Tang; Huang-Yi Fang; Yue Yang; Shi-Ze Li; Jian-Xi Liu; Han-Song Sheng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-01

4.  The Granule Size Mediates the In Vivo Foreign Body Response and the Integration Behavior of Bone Substitutes.

Authors:  Manuel Abels; Said Alkildani; Annica Pröhl; Xin Xiong; Rumen Krastev; Tadas Korzinskas; Sanja Stojanovic; Ole Jung; Stevo Najman; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.