Literature DB >> 32870708

Variability of Electrolaryngeal Speech Intelligibility in Multitalker Babble.

Steven R Cox1, Kimberly McNicholl1, Christine H Shadle2, Wei-Rong Chen2.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to report the variability of electrolarynx (EL) users' speech intelligibility in quiet and in multitalker babble. Method Ten EL users (five Servox® Digital, five TruTone™) who were at least 2 years postlaryngectomy provided recordings of five sentences from the 1965 Revised List of Phonetically Balanced Sentences. Recordings were judged by two groups of naïve listeners in quiet and in the presence of multitalker babble. Fifteen listeners orthographically transcribed a total of 750 sentences containing 3,750 key words in quiet, and another 15 listeners orthographically transcribed the same sentences mixed with multitalker babble. Results Significant differences in speech intelligibility were observed between listening conditions; 17.9% more key words were correctly identified in quiet compared to multitalker babble. Significant differences in fundamental frequency (F0) standard deviation and range but not speech intelligibility were observed between EL device types. A positive correlation of moderate significance was observed between F0 standard deviation and intelligibility for TruTone users in multitalker babble. Conclusions Findings suggest that listeners are able to identify a significantly higher percentage of EL users' speech in quiet compared to multitalker babble, but a large variability in EL users' speech intelligibility exists. Continued investigation involving a larger number of EL users is necessary to confirm this study's findings. Future research should explore the relationships among F0 measures, speaker characteristics (e.g., rate of speech, articulatory precision), and speech intelligibility, in addition to improving alaryngeal rehabilitation training protocols for EL users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32870708      PMCID: PMC8740568          DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  25 in total

1.  Impact of aberrant acoustic properties on the perception of sound quality in electrolarynx speech.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Meltzner; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Fundamental frequency variation with an electrolarynx improves speech understanding: a case study.

Authors:  Peter J Watson; Robert S Schlauch
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Salvage laryngectomy following organ-preservation therapy - An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Dustin A Silverman; Sidharth V Puram; James W Rocco; Matthew O Old; Stephen Y Kang
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  Acceptability ratings of normal, esophageal, and artificial larynx speech.

Authors:  S Bennett; B Weinberg
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1973-12

7.  Electrolaryngeal speech produced by laryngectomized subjects: perceptual characteristics.

Authors:  M S Weiss; A G Basili
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-06

8.  Association of Hospital Volume With Laryngectomy Outcomes in Patients With Larynx Cancer.

Authors:  Christine G Gourin; C Matthew Stewart; Kevin D Frick; Carole Fakhry; Karen T Pitman; David W Eisele; J Matthew Austin
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy and postoperative radiation therapy.

Authors:  William M Mendenhall; Christopher G Morris; Scott P Stringer; Robert J Amdur; Russell W Hinerman; Douglas B Villaret; K Thomas Robbins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Effects of presentation mode and repeated familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Katherine C Hustad; Meghan A Cahill
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.