David Zuanazzi1,2, Yizhi Xiao1, Walter L Siqueira3. 1. College of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. 2. Department of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. 3. College of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. walter.siqueira@usask.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether surface characteristics of different titanium modifications may influence the composition of the salivary pellicle on each surface by analyzing the salivary proteome through mass spectrometry-based proteomics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Titanium discs with three surfaces modifications (PT (machined titanium), SLA (sandblasted/large-grit/acid-etched), and SLActive (modified SLA)) were characterized (topography, chemistry, and energy) prior to being exposed to saliva for 2 h to form a protein pellicle. The resultant protein layer was retrieved and analyzed through mass spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS/MS) to examine the surface specificity for protein binding, while the proteome profile of each surface was classified. RESULTS: The proteome analysis showed that the salivary pellicle composition was more complex on rough surfaces (SLA and SLActive). Although variability in protein composition was observed between surfaces, most proteins were detected on more than one surface, indicating a limited surface specificity for protein binding. Additionally, the salivary pellicle formed on the SLActive presented a larger number of proteins associated with immune response, biological adhesion, and biomineralization. CONCLUSIONS: Although topography, chemistry, and energy differed between the surfaces, they were not determinant to produce a salivary pellicle with high surface specificity. Also, we showed that several salivary proteins adsorbed on Ti surfaces are involved in biological functions important to the biointegration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study sheds light on the necessity for the development of bioactive surfaces that favors the formation of a specific protein layer that can enhance tissue response to assist the biointegration of dental implants.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether surface characteristics of different titanium modifications may influence the composition of the salivary pellicle on each surface by analyzing the salivary proteome through mass spectrometry-based proteomics. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Titanium discs with three surfaces modifications (PT (machined titanium), SLA (sandblasted/large-grit/acid-etched), and SLActive (modified SLA)) were characterized (topography, chemistry, and energy) prior to being exposed to saliva for 2 h to form a protein pellicle. The resultant protein layer was retrieved and analyzed through mass spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS/MS) to examine the surface specificity for protein binding, while the proteome profile of each surface was classified. RESULTS: The proteome analysis showed that the salivary pellicle composition was more complex on rough surfaces (SLA and SLActive). Although variability in protein composition was observed between surfaces, most proteins were detected on more than one surface, indicating a limited surface specificity for protein binding. Additionally, the salivary pellicle formed on the SLActive presented a larger number of proteins associated with immune response, biological adhesion, and biomineralization. CONCLUSIONS: Although topography, chemistry, and energy differed between the surfaces, they were not determinant to produce a salivary pellicle with high surface specificity. Also, we showed that several salivary proteins adsorbed on Ti surfaces are involved in biological functions important to the biointegration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study sheds light on the necessity for the development of bioactive surfaces that favors the formation of a specific protein layer that can enhance tissue response to assist the biointegration of dental implants.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mass spectrometry; Proteins; Proteomics; Salivary pellicle; Salivary proteins; Titanium
Authors: Daniel O Costa; Paul D H Prowse; Tom Chrones; Stephen M Sims; Douglas W Hamilton; Amin S Rizkalla; S Jeffrey Dixon Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Martin Schuler; Gethin Rh Owen; Douglas W Hamilton; Michael de Wild; Marcus Textor; Donald M Brunette; Samuele G P Tosatti Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2006-03-29 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: David L Cochran; Daniel Buser; Christian M ten Bruggenkate; Dieter Weingart; Thomas M Taylor; Jean-Pierre Bernard; Françoise Peters; James P Simpson Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: J Y Martin; Z Schwartz; T W Hummert; D M Schraub; J Simpson; J Lankford; D D Dean; D L Cochran; B D Boyan Journal: J Biomed Mater Res Date: 1995-03
Authors: Michael Plecko; Christine Sievert; Daniel Andermatt; Robert Frigg; Peter Kronen; Karina Klein; Stefan Stübinger; Katja Nuss; Alexander Bürki; Stephen Ferguson; Ulrich Stoeckle; Brigitte von Rechenberg Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 2.362