| Literature DB >> 32869770 |
Qing Zhang1, Longjun Zhou1, Jianping Xia2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to explore the emotional resilience of middle school students learning at home in February and March 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact of this resilience on students' learning management skills. The results could provide a basis for psychological health education of middle school students during major life events. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study used a survey to explore emotional resilience and learning management abilities in middle school students (N=896) from February 10, 2020, to March 22, 2020. Students used online e-learning during this period due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analyzed using t-testing, Pearson's correlation, and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS The results indicate that emotional resilience was significantly lower in eighth grade students than in seventh grade students (t=1.98, P<0.05) and negative emotional recovery increased during the study period. Emotional resilience was positively correlated with learning management skills (r=0.498, P<0.01), and positive emotional ability predicted learning management skills. CONCLUSIONS The study findings indicate that in the face of major life events, emotional resilience is an important factor for the mental health of adolescents and improves coping ability. Cultivating positive emotions can improve learning efficiency.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32869770 PMCID: PMC7485285 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.924994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Adolescents’ emotional resilience questionnaire (in Chinese).
| 1. When I’m in a bad mood, I can think of something happy. |
| 2. Criticism from others will make me sad for a long time. |
| 3. No matter what difficulties I meet, I can keep a good mood. |
| 4. My mood is not easily disturbed by the outside world. |
| 5. Unhappy things will make me upset for a long time. |
| 6. I can adjust my negative emotions in a short time. |
| 7. Unpleasant events during the day often keep me awake at night. |
| 8. In the face of stress or frustration, I can find my own comfort. |
| 9. No matter how bad I feel, I can always look on the bright side. |
| 10. I feel bad when people misunderstand me. |
| 11. It is hard for me to calm down after an argument. |
The ability to generate positive emotions: 1, 3, 4, 8, 9. The ability to recover from negative emotional experiences: 2*, 5*, 6, 7*, 10*, 11* (* reverse scoring).
Differences in emotional resilience, dimensions, and learning management skills by grade.
| Seventh grade (N=451) | Eighth grade (N=445) | t | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Mean±SD | |||
| Emotional resilience | 37.53±7.7 | 36.57±6.78 | 1.98 | .048 |
| Ability to generate positive emotions | 18.53±4.21 | 18.49±3.87 | 0.098 | .922 |
| Ability to recover from negative emotional experiences | 19.01±4.68 | 18.07±4.35 | 3.12 | .002 |
| Learning management skills | 112.16±18.39 | 111.30±17.75 | 0.71 | .475 |
SD – standard deviation.
Independent samples t test of emotional resilience and high-score and low-score groups of various dimensions in learning management skills.
| Group | Mean±SD | t | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ability to generate positive emotions | −18.83 | 000 | |
| Low-score, N=291 | 99.14±14.4 | ||
| High-score, N=281 | 123.71±16.74 | ||
| Ability to recover from negative emotional experiences | −7.22 | 000 | |
| Low-score, N=281 | 108.41±17.93 | ||
| High-score, N=268 | 119.00±16.35 | ||
| Emotional resilience | −14.69 | 000 | |
| Low-score, N=274 | 101.16±16.14 | ||
| High-score, N=266 | 122.23±17.16 |
SD – standard deviation.
Correlation between learning management skills and emotional resilience and its dimensions.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional resilience | 1 | ||||||
| Ability to generate positive emotions | .827 | 1 | |||||
| Ability to recover from negative emotional experiences | .866 | .436 | 1 | ||||
| Learning management skills | .498 | .577 | .284 | 1 | |||
| Time management | .435 | .499 | .253 | .908 | 1 | ||
| Environment management | .480 | .521 | .306 | .862 | .643 | 1 | |
| Resource management | .420 | .529 | .202 | .911 | .771 | .678 | 1 |
P<0.05;
P<0.01.
Variables predictive for learning management skills by regression analysis.
| Dependent variable | Model | B | SE | Beta | t |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMS | Constant | 62.48 | 2.58 | 24.203 | |
| ARNEE | 0.16 | 0.121 | 0.040 | 1.324 n.s. | |
| AGPE | 2.50 | 0.136 | 0.559 | 18.44 | |
| r=0.578; R2=0.334; adjusted R2=0.333; F=224.103 | |||||
n.s. – not significant (P>0.05) [13].
P<0.001.
Predictable variable (constant): AGPE – the ability to generate positive emotions; ARNEE – the ability to recover from negative emotional experiences. Dependent variable: LMS – learning management skills; SE – standard error.