Literature DB >> 3286656

Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery.

C A Dodd1, C M Fergusson, L Freedman, G R Houghton, D Thomas.   

Abstract

The results of a study of the use of autograft versus allograft bone in the surgery of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis are presented. Two groups of patients, matched for age, sex, level and angle of curve, received bone grafts, 20 patients having autogenous bone from the iliac crest and the other 20 having donor bone from a bone bank. Both groups had otherwise identical posterior fusions and Harrington instrumentation. There was no difference between the two groups in a blind, radiographic assessment of bone graft mass at six months, nor in maintenance of the curve correction over the same period. No major operative complications nor failures of instrumentation were encountered. There was, however, a marked reduction in operative time and blood loss in the patients receiving donor bone and also a much lower incidence of late symptoms relating to the operative sites. We conclude that, even in the presence of adequate iliac crest, the use of bank bone is superior for grafting in idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3286656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  21 in total

1.  Healing properties of allograft from alendronate-treated animal in lumbar spine interbody cage fusion.

Authors:  Qingyun Xue; Haisheng Li; Xuenong Zou; Mathias Bünger; Niels Egund; Martin Lind; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Freeze-dried allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. A retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  J Recht; F Bayard; C Delloye; A Vincent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Bone transplantation.

Authors:  L Schweiberer; H Stützle; H K Mandelkow
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Evaluating post-operative pain management at the iliac crest bone graft site: an editorial.

Authors:  Uzondu F Agochukwu; John G DeVine
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

7.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 8.  A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Ryan Cassilly; Winifred Cantor; Emmanuel Edusei; Qusai Hammouri; Thomas Errico
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Allograft bone transplantation: a Sheffield experience.

Authors:  M T Khan; I Stockley; C Ibbotson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Autogenously vascularised bone allografts. Experimental model of a new bone-muscle composite graft.

Authors:  C Braun
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.