Lindsey K Lepley1, Steven M Davi2, Julie P Burland3, Adam S Lepley1. 1. School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut. 3. Spaulding National Running Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Distinct from the muscle atrophy that develops from inactivity or disuse, atrophy that occurs after traumatic joint injury continues despite the patient being actively engaged in exercise. Recognizing the multitude of factors and cascade of events that are present and negatively influence the regulation of muscle mass after traumatic joint injury will likely enable clinicians to design more effective treatment strategies. To provide sports medicine practitioners with the best strategies to optimize muscle mass, the purpose of this clinical review is to discuss the predominant mechanisms that control muscle atrophy for disuse and posttraumatic scenarios, and to highlight how they differ. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Articles that reported on disuse atrophy and muscle atrophy after traumatic joint injury were collected from peer-reviewed sources available on PubMed (2000 through December 2019). Search terms included the following: disuse muscle atrophy OR disuse muscle mass OR anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL AND mechanism OR muscle loss OR atrophy OR neurological disruption OR rehabilitation OR exercise. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5. RESULTS: We highlight that (1) muscle atrophy after traumatic joint injury is due to a broad range of atrophy-inducing factors that are resistant to standard resistance exercises and need to be effectively targeted with treatments and (2) neurological disruptions after traumatic joint injury uncouple the nervous system from muscle tissue, contributing to a more complex manifestation of muscle loss as well as degraded tissue quality. CONCLUSION: Atrophy occurring after traumatic joint injury is distinctly different from the muscle atrophy that develops from disuse and is likely due to the broad range of atrophy-inducing factors that are present after injury. Clinicians must challenge the standard prescriptive approach to combating muscle atrophy from simply prescribing physical activity to targeting the neurophysiological origins of muscle atrophy after traumatic joint injury.
CONTEXT: Distinct from the muscle atrophy that develops from inactivity or disuse, atrophy that occurs after traumatic joint injury continues despite the patient being actively engaged in exercise. Recognizing the multitude of factors and cascade of events that are present and negatively influence the regulation of muscle mass after traumatic joint injury will likely enable clinicians to design more effective treatment strategies. To provide sports medicine practitioners with the best strategies to optimize muscle mass, the purpose of this clinical review is to discuss the predominant mechanisms that control muscle atrophy for disuse and posttraumatic scenarios, and to highlight how they differ. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Articles that reported on disuse atrophy and muscle atrophy after traumatic joint injury were collected from peer-reviewed sources available on PubMed (2000 through December 2019). Search terms included the following: disuse muscle atrophy OR disuse muscle mass OR anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL AND mechanism OR muscle loss OR atrophy OR neurological disruption OR rehabilitation OR exercise. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5. RESULTS: We highlight that (1) muscle atrophy after traumatic joint injury is due to a broad range of atrophy-inducing factors that are resistant to standard resistance exercises and need to be effectively targeted with treatments and (2) neurological disruptions after traumatic joint injury uncouple the nervous system from muscle tissue, contributing to a more complex manifestation of muscle loss as well as degraded tissue quality. CONCLUSION: Atrophy occurring after traumatic joint injury is distinctly different from the muscle atrophy that develops from disuse and is likely due to the broad range of atrophy-inducing factors that are present after injury. Clinicians must challenge the standard prescriptive approach to combating muscle atrophy from simply prescribing physical activity to targeting the neurophysiological origins of muscle atrophy after traumatic joint injury.
Authors: Brian Noehren; Anders Andersen; Peter Hardy; Darren L Johnson; Mary Lloyd Ireland; Katherine L Thompson; Bruce Damon Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 5.284