Alison K Krajewski1,2, Kristen M Rappazzo2, Peter H Langlois3,4, Lynne C Messer5, Danelle T Lobdell2. 1. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Postdoctoral Fellow at United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. 2. US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center of Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. 3. Texas Department of State Health Services, Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Austin, Texas, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health - Austin Regional Campus, Austin, Texas, USA. 5. OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Causes of most birth defects are largely unknown. Genetics, maternal factors (e.g., age, smoking) and environmental exposures have all been linked to some birth defects, including neural tube, oral cleft, limb reduction, and gastroschisis; however, the contribution of cumulative exposures across several environmental domains in association with these defects is not well understood. METHODS: The Environmental Quality Index (EQI) and its domains (air, water, land, sociodemographic, built) were used to estimate county-level cumulative environmental exposures from 2006-2010 and matched to birth defects identified from Texas Birth Defects Registry and live birth records from births in years 2007-2010 (N = 1,610,709). Poisson regression models estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between 10 birth defects and the EQI. RESULTS: We observed some positive associations between worst environmental quality and neural tube, anencephaly, spina bifida, oral cleft, cleft palate, cleft lip with and without cleft palate, and gastroschisis [PR range: 1.12-1.55], but near null associations with limb reduction defects. Among domain specific results, we observed the strongest positive associations with the sociodemographic domain across birth defects but varied positive associations among the air and water domains, and negative or null associations with the land and built domains. Overall, few exposure-response patterns were evident. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the complexities of cumulative, simultaneous environmental exposures in the prevalence rates of 10 selected birth defects. We were able to explore the impact of overall and domain specific environmental quality on birth defects and identify potential domain specific drivers of these associations.
BACKGROUND: Causes of most birth defects are largely unknown. Genetics, maternal factors (e.g., age, smoking) and environmental exposures have all been linked to some birth defects, including neural tube, oral cleft, limb reduction, and gastroschisis; however, the contribution of cumulative exposures across several environmental domains in association with these defects is not well understood. METHODS: The Environmental Quality Index (EQI) and its domains (air, water, land, sociodemographic, built) were used to estimate county-level cumulative environmental exposures from 2006-2010 and matched to birth defects identified from Texas Birth Defects Registry and live birth records from births in years 2007-2010 (N = 1,610,709). Poisson regression models estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between 10 birth defects and the EQI. RESULTS: We observed some positive associations between worst environmental quality and neural tube, anencephaly, spina bifida, oral cleft, cleft palate, cleft lip with and without cleft palate, and gastroschisis [PR range: 1.12-1.55], but near null associations with limb reduction defects. Among domain specific results, we observed the strongest positive associations with the sociodemographic domain across birth defects but varied positive associations among the air and water domains, and negative or null associations with the land and built domains. Overall, few exposure-response patterns were evident. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the complexities of cumulative, simultaneous environmental exposures in the prevalence rates of 10 selected birth defects. We were able to explore the impact of overall and domain specific environmental quality on birth defects and identify potential domain specific drivers of these associations.
Authors: Christine L Gray; Danelle T Lobdell; Kristen M Rappazzo; Yun Jian; Jyotsna S Jagai; Lynne C Messer; Achal P Patel; Stephanie A DeFlorio-Barker; Christopher Lyttle; Julian Solway; Andrey Rzhetsky Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Ying Wang; Gang Liu; Mark A Canfield; Cara T Mai; Suzanne M Gilboa; Robert E Meyer; Marlene Anderka; Glenn E Copeland; James E Kucik; Wendy N Nembhard; Russell S Kirby Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Amy M Padula; Wei Yang; Suzan L Carmichael; Frederick Lurmann; John Balmes; S Katharine Hammond; Gary M Shaw Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Lynne C Messer; Thomas J Luben; Pauline Mendola; Susan E Carozza; Scott A Horel; Peter H Langlois Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Jean D Brender; F Benjamin Zhan; Peter H Langlois; Lucina Suarez; Angela Scheuerle Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2007-04-30 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Kristen M Rappazzo; Joshua L Warren; Robert E Meyer; Amy H Herring; Alison P Sanders; Naomi C Brownstein; Thomas J Luben Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2016-03-11
Authors: Warren G Foster; Jane A Evans; Julian Little; Laura Arbour; Aideen Moore; Reg Sauve; Juan Andrés León; Wei Luo Journal: Crit Rev Toxicol Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.635
Authors: Kristen M Rappazzo; Lynne C Messer; Jyotsna S Jagai; Christine L Gray; Shannon C Grabich; Danelle T Lobdell Journal: Environ Health Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 5.984