Literature DB >> 32864385

A Pilot Intervention Targeting Dietary Intake in School Cafeterias.

Suzanne E Mazzeo1,2, Melanie K Bean2, Allison A Palmberg1, Courtney C Simpson1, Leroy R Thacker3, Mary Dunne Stewart4, Rachel W Gow1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed fruit and vegetable (F&V) waste during school meals in two public elementary schools, and investigated the impact of a tasting intervention implemented in one of these schools.
METHODS: F&V waste was evaluated before (baseline), immediately after (post-testing), and six weeks following (follow-up), the tasting intervention.
RESULTS: The modal outcome at each assessment was that children ate all of the served F&Vs. During tastings, most children attempted and liked the offered F&Vs. No differences between schools in F&V waste were evident at post-testing; at follow-up, the intervention school had significantly less F&V waste than the control school.
CONCLUSIONS: Generally, students were consuming the F&Vs served. Policy impact might be enhanced via a low-intensity tasting intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  food policy; school meals

Year:  2017        PMID: 32864385      PMCID: PMC7451257          DOI: 10.14485/hbpr.4.3.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Behav Policy Rev        ISSN: 2326-4403


  31 in total

1.  Using a visual plate waste study to monitor menu performance.

Authors:  Priscilla L Connors; Sarah B Rozell
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2004-01

2.  Cost-free and sustainable incentive increases healthy eating decisions during elementary school lunch.

Authors:  D W Pittman; J S Parker; B R Getz; C M Jackson; T-A P Le; S B Riggs; J M Shay
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Nutrition standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2012-01-26

4.  Impact of the National School Lunch Program on Fruit and Vegetable Selection in Northeastern Elementary Schoolchildren, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Sarah A Amin; Bethany A Yon; Jennifer C Taylor; Rachel K Johnson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  'Finish your soup': counterproductive effects of pressuring children to eat on intake and affect.

Authors:  Amy T Galloway; Laura M Fiorito; Lori A Francis; Leann L Birch
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Protecting progress against childhood obesity--the National School Lunch Program.

Authors:  Jennifer A Woo Baidal; Elsie M Taveras
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A cafeteria-based tasting program increased liking of fruits and vegetables by lower, middle and upper elementary school-age children.

Authors:  Anantha Lakkakula; James P Geaghan; Wei-Ping Wong; Michael Zanovec; Sarah H Pierce; Georgianna Tuuri
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Age and gender differences in children's food preferences.

Authors:  Lucy J Cooke; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 9.  Treatment and prevention of obesity: what is the role of exercise?

Authors:  John M Jakicic; Amy D Otto
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.110

10.  New school meal regulations increase fruit consumption and do not increase total plate waste.

Authors:  Marlene B Schwartz; Kathryn E Henderson; Margaret Read; Nicole Danna; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.