Literature DB >> 32864368

Preparation and efficacy of freeze-dried inactivated vaccine against bovine viral diarrhea virus genotypes 1 and 2, bovine herpes virus type 1.1, bovine parainfluenza-3 virus, and bovine respiratory syncytial virus.

Maha Raafat Abd El Fadeel1, Ashraf Taha El-Dakhly2, Ahmad Mohammad Allam3, Tarek Korany Farag3, Alaa Abdel-Moneim El-Kholy4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bovine respiratory disease is a worldwide health concern in the feedlot cattle causing morbidity and mortality in young with major economic losses to the producer. Programs of vaccination are integral parts of preventive health programs. We aim to prepare and evaluate lyophilized combined inactivated viruses (bovine viral diarrhea virus [BVDV] genotypes 1 and 2, bovine herpes virus type 1.1 [BoHV-1.1], bovine parainfluenza-3 virus [BPI-3V], and bovine respiratory syncytial virus [BRSV]) vaccine using saponin as a solvent and adjuvant in cattle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lyophilized Pneumo-5 vaccine was formulated to include the inactivated BVDV genotypes 1 and 2, BoHV-1.1, BPI-3V, and BRSV. The saponin solution was used as an adjuvant and solvent. The prepared vaccines were adjusted to contain 1- and 1.5-mg saponin/dose. It was evaluated for its sterility, safety, and potency in mice and calves. The antibody titers in vaccinated calves were measured by virus neutralization test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
RESULTS: The Pneumo-5 vaccine was found to be free from any contaminants and safe in mice. Meanwhile, the vaccine showed safety in calves which inoculated intramuscularly with the double dose of the vaccines. The overall immune response reached its peak in the 2nd-month post-vaccination. The vaccine contained saponin 1.5 mg/dose reached its antibodies peak in the 4th-week post-vaccination. All groups of vaccinated calves with both concentrations of the saponin did not show statistical significance in antibody titers measured by serum neutralization test and/or ELISA.
CONCLUSION: The prepared vaccine, namely Pneumo-5, and adjuvanted with either 1 or 1.5 mg/dose saponin was proved safe and potent for effectual protection of calves against BVDV genotypes 1 and 2, BoHV-1.1, BPI-3V, and BRSV. © Korean Vaccine Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bovine respiratory disease; Freeze drying; Inactivated vaccines; Saponins; Viral vaccines

Year:  2020        PMID: 32864368      PMCID: PMC7445318          DOI: 10.7774/cevr.2020.9.2.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Vaccine Res        ISSN: 2287-3651


Introduction

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a worldwide health concern in the feedlot cattle causing morbidity and mortality in young with major economic losses to the producer [1]. BRD occurs most often within 4 weeks after weaning where it is considered a stressful time for calves [2]. It is a multi-factorial syndrome where the viral infection combines with the bacterial agents, and intensified by stress [3]. The viruses involved with BRD include bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), bovine herpes virus (BoHV), bovine parainfluenza-3 virus (BPI-3V), and bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) [4]. BRD in Egyptian cattle is caused by a variety of viral agents which include BVDV genotypes 1 and 2 [5], BoHV type 1 (BoHV-1) [6], BPI-3V, and BRSV [7]. Programs of vaccination for breeding herds are integral parts of preventive health programs which are performed to decrease the effects of infectious respiratory diseases and considered the most cost-effective method in controlling disease particularly viral infectious diseases [8]. Selecting the adjuvant is one of the keys for the success of the vaccine. There are two main technologies for veterinary adjuvant in the field can fit with multiple expectations as safety and efficacy in various species such as aluminum salts and emulsion [9]. In Egypt, prevention and control of the syndrome are considered successful and economically attainable than treatment. One of the ideal protocols includes vaccination of the herd with safe, potent and effective inactivated vaccine (Pneumo-5) which contains the five viral antigens adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide and/or oil [10]. Locally prepared inactivated gel Pneumo-3 vaccine containing BVDV-1, BoHV-1, and BPI-3V was the first edition to face the syndrome in Egypt. Then, Pneumo-4 vaccine was produced by adding BRSV to Pneumo-3 [11]. The saponin substance (Quillaja Sapinaria Molina) is extracted from bark of the tree Soapbark [12]. The saponin can be used as solvent and adjuvant [13]. The motivation of immune-cell proliferation and increasing the titer of all major immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses in vivo is one of main function of the saponin substance [141516]. In the meantime, the strong immune adjuvant activity reported for the crude extract of the plant bark, and its derivatives, makes them ideal adjuvant for the vaccine development [17]. Aim of the work, it was carried out to prepare and evaluate polyvalent inactivated viruses (BVDV genotypes 1 and 2, BoHV-1.1, BPI-3V, and BRSV) vaccine using saponin (Quillaja Saponaria Molina extract) as solvent and adjuvant to the lyophilized vaccine.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

Care and use of laboratory animals in this study were approved by the Medical and Veterinary Research Ethics Committee at the National Research Centre in Egypt (No., 20/053).

Viruses and cell line

The local Egyptian strains of BVDV genotype-1 (BVDV-1) “Iman strain” with a titer of 106.5 tissue culture infectious dose 50% (TCID50)/mL; BVDV genotype-2 (BVDV-2) cytopathic strain “strain 125” with a titer of 106.5 TCID50/mL; BoHV type 1.1 (BoHV-1.1) “Abou Hammad strain” with a titer of 107.5 TCID50/mL; BPI-3V “strain 45” with a titer of 108 TCID50/mL; and BRSV “strain 375L” with a titer of 108 TCID50/mL were kindly supplied by the Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI), Cairo, Egypt. All viruses were propagated and titrated on Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cell line which has been proved free of any extraneous contamination. The cell lines were developed at 37℃, in minimum essential medium with Earle's salts (Minimum Essential Medium Eagle) supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 25 IU/mL mycostatin. Prior to experimental work, these viruses were tested for their identity by virus neutralization test using the respective specific reference antisera which were supplied by VSVRI, Cairo, Egypt.

Experimental animals

Mice

Fifteen Albino Swiss mice were obtained from Laboratory Animal Breeding Farm at VSVRI and were used to study the safety of the prepared vaccines divided into three groups (five mice/group).

Calves

Eighteen clinically apparent healthy mixed bred calves aging 6–8 months, in a private farm in Beni Seuf Governorate, were used to study the safety and potency of the vaccines (nine calves for each experiment). Before vaccination, all calves and mice were proved seronegative to the viral strains incorporated in the prepared vaccine and examined for internal and external parasites. Mice were kept in the hygienic animal facilities at the VSVRI.

Vaccine preparation

The lyophilized Pneumo-5 vaccine was formulated to include the five inactivated antigens BVDV-1 and 2, BoHV-1, BPI-3V, and BRSV. The saponin solution (Quillaja Saponaria Molina extract) was used as adjuvant and for reconstitution. Briefly, confluent monolayers of MDBK cells grown in Roux bottles were inoculated with the five agents separately at multiplicity of infection 2 to 1 (virus to cell) and incubated at 37℃ in the presence of 1 mg/mL of trypsin. After 70%–80% of the infected cells showed cytopathic effect, the culture fluid was harvested, clarified, and titrated. Viruses were inactivated individually by stirring with 0.01 M binary ethyleneimine (BEI 10% volume/volume [v/v]) at 37℃ overnight. Sodium thiosulphate (20%) was then added with a final concentration of 2% to stop the action of BEI [1819]. Then we mixed equal amounts from the five inactivated viruses fluid. Thereafter, we add the stabilizer (sucrose and lactalbumen) v/v and then aliquot and lyophilized. The lyophilization process was carried out using a freeze-dryer apparatus (2014-033; Shanghai Tofflon Science & Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). On final vaccine formulation, the vaccine dose should contain least titer of 106 TCID50 of each virus [20].

Quality control of the vaccine

Sterility test

Different steps of vaccine preparation were subjected to in-process testing for sterility to prove that the prepared vaccine was free from any contaminants [20].

Safety of vaccines

Safety in mice: Fifteen adult albino mice were used to study the safety of the vaccine. The mice were divided into three groups each of five mice. All mice were inoculated intraperitoneal with 0.2 mL/mice of the prepared vaccines as follows; the first two groups were inoculated with the lyophilized vaccine reconstituted in saponin 1 and 1.5 mg/dose, respectively. The 3rd group was inoculated with physiological saline as control. All mice were kept under observation for 2 weeks for the detection of any clinical abnormalities [20]. Safety in calves: Nine male calves were divided into three groups (3 calves/group) used to evaluate the vaccine safety. The first two groups were inoculated intramuscular with double dose of the lyophilized vaccines which reconstituted in saponin 1 and 1.5 mg/dose, respectively [21]. The 3rd group was inoculated with the same dose and route by physiological saline solution. All animals were observed up to 21 days afterwards for development of any clinical abnormalities.

Potency of the vaccines in calves

Nine male calves were divided into three groups (3 calves/group) where the first two groups were inoculated with 1 mL of the lyophilized vaccine which is reconstituted in 1 and 1.5 mg saponin/dose, respectively. The 3rd group was kept as non-vaccinated control calves. Poster dose was given to all calves 2 weeks post-vaccination [20]. Serum samples were collected from all calves on the first day of vaccination (0 day), 2nd week, 4th week, and every month up to 6 months post-vaccination. All serum samples were inactivated at 56℃ for 30 minutes and stored at −20℃ until used in virus neutralization test against all viral components of the prepared vaccine.

Serological investigations

Virus neutralization test

The test carried out [22] and the antibody titer calculated [23]. The antibody titer expressed as log10 using logarithmic tables.

Indirect ELISA

Seroconversion of vaccinated calves and mice against viral components of the prepared vaccine were estimated by indirect in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with modifications [24]. The results were recorded using a computer-assisted micro plate reader (ELx808TM Absorbance Micro Plate Reader; BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

Statistical methodology

Statistical analysis was performed with the aid of Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). The data were expressed as mean±standard deviations. Data were compared using the unpaired Student t-test. A p-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

The freeze-dried inactivated vaccines prepared against BVDV genotype 1 and 2, BoHV-1.1, BPI-3V, and BRSV (Pneumo-5) were found to be free from any contaminants. Besides, it was safe in mice and calves inoculated with both concentrations (1 and 1.5 mg saponin/dose) of saponin. All animals did not show abnormal clinical signs and remained survive until the end of experiment. Regarding the serological examination explained in Tables 1 and 2 and Figs. 1 and 2, generally speaking, there was gradual increase in the values of virus neutralizing antibody titers and indirect ELISA values from the 2nd-week post-vaccination against all antigens in vaccinated calves. There was ascending increment reaching the peak on the 2nd month in vaccinated calves with the Pneumo-5 vaccine reconstituted in saponin (1 mg/dose) while in calves' vaccinated Pneumo-5 vaccine reconstituted in saponin (1.5 mg/dose) showed increased antibody titers reaching their peak in the 4th-week post-vaccination. Controls had any reactions. There was no statistical significance in antibodies titers measured by serum neutralization test (SNT) and/or ELISA among all vaccinated calve groups.
Table 1

Mean virus neutralizing antibody titers of calve vaccinated with Pneumo-5 vaccine reconstituted in saponin (1 and 1.5 mg/dose) expressed as log10

Period post-vaccinationDetected serum neutralizing antibody titers (log10) in calves receiving
1 mg saponin per dose1.5 mg saponin per dose
BVDV-1BVDV-2BoHV-1BPI-3VBRSVBVDV-1BVDV-2BoHV-1BPI-3VBRSV
0 Day0.2 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.2 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
2nd WPV0.45 ± 0.010.45 ± 0.010.65 ± 0.040.61 ± 0.050.43 ± 0.050.6 ± 0.010.6 ± 0.010.7 ± 0.020.69 ± 0.330.6 ± 0.01
4th WPV1.64 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.251.85 ± 0.031.85 ± 0.051.63 ± 0.22.1 ± 0.562.1 ± 0.22.3 ± 0.252.3 ± 0.22.16 ± 0.25
2nd MPV1.8 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.42.05 ± 0.552.0 ± 0.21.82 ± 0.051.9 ± 0.051.91 ± 0.22.06 ± 0.252.0 ± 0.251.9 ± 0.4
3rd MPV1.6 ± 0.41.65 ± 0.251.8 ± 0.021.8 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.21.69 ± 0.331.78 ± 0.41.9 ± 0.051.9 ± 0.21.75 ± 0.33
4th MPV1.45 ± 0.251.5 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.041.6 ± 0.331.4 ± 0.041.5 ± 0.21.56 ± 0.331.72 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.4
5th MPV1.2 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.251.2 ± 0.141.4 ± 0.331.15 ± 0.41.3 ± 0.051.35 ± 0.331.5 ± 0.41.5 ± 0.21.42 ± 0.2
6th MPV0.9 ± 0.010.94 ± 0.050.9 ± 0.051.2 ± 0.050.9 ± 0.011.09 ± 0.331.19 ± 0.331.32 ± 0.61.3 ± 0.031.2 ± 0.2

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

BVDV, bovine viral diarrhea virus; BoHV, bovine herpes virus; BPI-3V, bovine parainfluenza-3 virus; BRSV, bovine respiratory syncytial virus; WPV, week post-vaccination; MPV, month post-vaccination.

Table 2

Mean enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay value in sera of calf vaccinated with Pneumo-5 reconstituted in saponin (1 and 1.5 mg/dose)

Period post-vaccination1 mg saponin per dose1.5 mg saponin per dose
BVDV-1BVDV-2BoHV-1BPI-3BRSVBVDV-1BVDV-2BoHV-1BPI-3BRSV
0 Day0.2 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
2nd WPV1.1 ± 0.031.1 ± 0.0351.4 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.040.92 ± 0.010.83 ± 0.010.85 ± 0.010.9 ± 0.010.88 ± 0.020.85 ± 0.02
4th WPV1.95 ± 0.351.95 ± 0.362.1 ± 0.032.05 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.22.3 ± 0.252.3 ± 0.362.54 ± 0.32.5 ± 0.62.48 ± 0.36
2nd MPV2.0 ± 0.362.0 ± 0.042.3 ± 0.032.25 ± 0.22.01 ± 0.362.1 ± 0.252.1 ± 0.362.32 ± 0.252.3 ± 0.542.22 ± 0.36
3rd MPV1.75 ± 0.41.75 ± 0.051.9 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.41.76 ± 0.331.9 ± 0.351.9 ± 0.22.16 ± 0.252.1 ± 0.362.02 ± 0.25
4th MPV1.55 ± 0.41.55 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.361.7 ± 0.61.5 ± 0.21.72 ± 0.21.72 ± 0.241.91 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.2
5th MPV1.3 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.061.5 ± 0.41.5 ± 0.41.3 ± 0.41.54 ± 0.41.54 ± 0.361.73 ± 0.081.7 ± 0.41.55 ± 0.4

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

BVDV, bovine viral diarrhea virus; BoHV, bovine herpes virus; BPI-3V, bovine parainfluenza-3 virus; BRSV, bovine respiratory syncytial virus; WPV, week post-vaccination; MPV, month post-vaccination.

Fig. 1

Mean log10 virus neutralizing antibody titers of calves vaccinated with Pneumo-5 vaccine reconstituted in saponin (1 and 1.5 mg/dose). BVDV, bovine viral diarrhea virus; BoHV, bovine herpes virus; BPI-3V, bovine parainfluenza-3 virus; BRSV, bovine respiratory syncytial virus.

Fig. 2

Mean enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay value in sera of calf vaccinated with Pneumo-5 reconstituted in saponin (1 and 1.5 mg/dose). BVDV, bovine viral diarrhea virus; BoHV, bovine herpes virus; BPI-3V, bovine parainfluenza-3 virus; BRSV, bovine respiratory syncytial virus.

Discussion

BRD syndrome usually causes major economic losses mainly due to decreased performance, high morbidity, mortality, the expenses of medication, and labor to treat the sick animals [1]. It is still challenging due to the multi-factorial nature and complexity of the disease. Thus, availability of reliable combined vaccines has been considered the appropriate alternative for combating the syndrome through traditional approaches [25]. Vaccination against the presumed causal organisms is a commonly used tactic to assist in the prevention of BRD. With significant concern for prudent antibiotic use in the beef industry, it is vital that decision making with regards BRD management be based on understanding of the efficacy of vaccination programs and management factors that might modify the efficacy of the preventive management practice [26]. In the present study, the Pneumo-5 vaccine performance was assessed against BVDV genotypes 1 and 2, BoHV-1.1, BPI-3V, and BRSV. The saponin extracted from Quillaja Sapinaria Molina was used as adjuvant to stimulate and activate the humeral immune responses [27]. Results of sterility testing of the prepared vaccine indicated its freedom from any bacterial, fungal, or mycoplasma contamination on inoculated media. It was also found safe in mice and claves with even the double field dose. These findings meet the safety requirements and recommendations of the World Organization for Animal Health manual [20]. Vigor assessment of the prepared freeze-dried inactivated vaccine against BVDV genotypes 1 and 2, BoHV-1.1, BPI-3V, and BRSV which reconstituted in 1 and 1.5 mg saponin/dose was evaluated by the SNT and indirect ELISA. The results revealed that all vaccinated calves have robust neutralizing antibodies against all viral components of the vaccine starting from the 2nd-week post-vaccination in agreement with [2829]. The titer of antibodies increased gradually and the duration of immunity lasted up to 6th month of vaccination in accordance with the results of [3031]. The minimum protective log10 antibody titers were achieved for all viral agents where that of BVDV are 0.9 and for BoHV, BPI-3V, and BRSV is 0.6 [11]. It is clear from the results that the using of Pneumo-5 reconstituted in 1.5 mg saponin/dose gave higher and protective titers in the 4th-week post-vaccination than the other dose 1 mg saponin/dose. These results agree with those of Ojiako et al. [27] who mentioned that the using of saponin with vaccine as adjuvant by certain concentration become well than other adjuvants, where saponin able to stimulate strong antibody production. Numerous publications proved the suitability of Quillaja extract to be used as adjuvant with diverse of viral vaccines. Saponin was used as an adjuvant in bovine viral diarrhea virus vaccine in mice [32]. These findings revealed its capability of stimulating both cellular and humoral immune responses. They found that the total specific IgG against BVDV were elevated in all groups inoculated with saponin adjuvanted preparations. On the other hand, Quillaja leaves extract was used as an adjuvant in BoHV-5 vaccine and revealed a significant increase in total IgG in vaccinated mice compared with other known adjuvants [33]. Meanwhile, the Quillaja extract saponins used in BoHV-1 vaccines in mice showed significant induction of antibodies against the virus in immunized mice [34]. In conclusion, the prepared vaccine, namely Pneumo-5, and adjuvanted with either 1 or 1.5 mg saponin/dose and the intramuscular route was proved safe and potent for effectual protection of calves against BVDV genotypes 1 and 2, BoHV-1.1, BPI-3V, and BRSV.
  15 in total

1.  Enzyme immunoassays in diagnostic medicine. Theory and practice.

Authors:  A Voller; D E Bidwell; A Bartlett
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Quillaja brasiliensis saponins are less toxic than Quil A and have similar properties when used as an adjuvant for a viral antigen preparation.

Authors:  F Silveira; S P Cibulski; A P Varela; J M Marqués; A Chabalgoity; F de Costa; A C A Yendo; G Gosmann; P M Roehe; C Fernández; F Ferreira
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  A new biologically active acylated triterpene saponin from Silene fortunei.

Authors:  M A Lacaille-Dubois; B Hanquet; Z H Cui; Z C Lou; H Wagner
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.050

4.  Adjuvant activity of Quillaja brasiliensis saponins on the immune responses to bovine herpesvirus type 1 in mice.

Authors:  Juliane D Fleck; Carla Kauffmann; Fernando Spilki; Claiton L Lencina; Paulo M Roehe; Grace Gosmann
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  BRD in 2014: where have we been, where are we now, and where do we want to go?

Authors:  W Mark Hilton
Journal:  Anim Health Res Rev       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.615

Review 6.  Adjuvant effects of saponins on animal immune responses.

Authors:  Zahid Iqbal Rajput; Song-hua Hu; Chen-wen Xiao; Abdullah G Arijo
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Alum adjuvanticity: unraveling a century old mystery.

Authors:  Ennio De Gregorio; Elaine Tritto; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Preliminary studies on the formulation of immune stimulating complexes using saponin from Carica papaya leaves.

Authors:  Chioma Miracle Ojiako; Ebere Innocent Okoye; Angus Nnamdi Oli; Chibueze Jeremiah Ike; Charles O Esimone; Anthony A Attama
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-06-22

Review 9.  Saponins from Quillaja saponaria and Quillaja brasiliensis: Particular Chemical Characteristics and Biological Activities.

Authors:  Juliane Deise Fleck; Andresa Heemann Betti; Francini Pereira da Silva; Eduardo Artur Troian; Cristina Olivaro; Fernando Ferreira; Simone Gasparin Verza
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Inactivation of viral antigens for vaccine preparation with particular reference to the application of binary ethylenimine.

Authors:  H G Bahnemann
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.