Literature DB >> 32863480

Prediction Accuracy Measures for a Nonlinear Model and for Right-Censored Time-to-Event Data.

Gang Li1, Xiaoyan Wang2.   

Abstract

This article develops a pair of new prediction summary measures for a nonlinear prediction function with right-censored time-to-event data. The first measure, defined as the proportion of explained variance by a linearly corrected prediction function, quantifies the potential predictive power of the nonlinear prediction function. The second measure, defined as the proportion of explained prediction error by its corrected prediction function, gauges the closeness of the prediction function to its corrected version and serves as a supplementary measure to indicate (by a value less than 1) whether the correction is needed to fulfill its potential predictive power and quantify how much prediction error reduction can be realized with the correction. The two measures together provide a complete summary of the predictive accuracy of the nonlinear prediction function. We motivate these measures by first establishing a variance decomposition and a prediction error decomposition at the population level and then deriving uncensored and censored sample versions of these decompositions. We note that for the least square prediction function under the linear model with no censoring, the first measure reduces to the classical coefficient of determination and the second measure degenerates to 1. We show that the sample measures are consistent estimators of their population counterparts and conduct extensive simulations to investigate their finite sample properties. A real data illustration is provided using the PBC data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online. An R package PAmeasures has been developed and made available via the CRAN R library. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Censoring; Coefficient of determination; Cox’s proportional hazards model; Explained prediction error; Explained variance

Year:  2019        PMID: 32863480      PMCID: PMC7454169          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1515079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  12 in total

1.  Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data.

Authors:  E Graf; C Schmoor; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999 Sep 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Summarizing the predictive power of a generalized linear model.

Authors:  B Zheng; A Agresti
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Predictive accuracy and explained variation in Cox regression.

Authors:  M Schemper; R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  R2: a useful measure of model performance when predicting a dichotomous outcome.

Authors:  A Ash; M Shwartz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A new measure of prognostic separation in survival data.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Willi Sauerbrei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A measure of explained variation for event history data.

Authors:  Janez Stare; Maja Pohar Perme; Robin Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Explained randomness in proportional hazards models.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Ronghui Xu; Janez Stare
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The area under the ROC curve and its competitors.

Authors:  J Hilden
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Measures of explained variation for survival data.

Authors:  E L Korn; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Estimation and Inference for High Dimensional Generalized Linear Models: A Splitting and Smoothing Approach.

Authors:  Zhe Fei; Yi Li
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 5.177

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.