Literature DB >> 15532086

Explained randomness in proportional hazards models.

John O'Quigley1, Ronghui Xu, Janez Stare.   

Abstract

A coefficient of explained randomness, analogous to explained variation but for non-linear models, was presented by Kent. The construct hinges upon the notion of Kullback-Leibler information gain. Kent and O'Quigley developed these ideas, obtaining simple, multiple and partial coefficients for the situation of proportional hazards regression. Their approach was based upon the idea of transforming a general proportional hazards model to a specific one of Weibull form. Xu and O'Quigley developed a more direct approach, more in harmony with the semi-parametric nature of the proportional hazards model thereby simplifying inference and allowing, for instance, the use of time dependent covariates. A potential drawback to the coefficient of Xu and O'Quigley is its interpretation as explained randomness in the covariate given time. An investigator might feel that the interpretation of the Kent and O'Quigley coefficient, as a proportion of explained randomness of time given the covariate, is preferable. One purpose of this note is to indicate that, under an independent censoring assumption, the two population coefficients coincide. Thus the simpler inferential setting for Xu and O'Quigley can also be applied to the coefficient of Kent and O'Quigley. Our second purpose is to point out that a sample-based coefficient in common use in the SAS statistical package can be interpreted as an estimate of explained randomness when there is no censoring. When there is censoring the SAS coefficient would not seem satisfactory in that its population counterpart depends on an independent censoring mechanism. However there is a quick fix and we argue in favour of its use. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15532086     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  41 in total

1.  A measure of explained risk in the proportional hazards model.

Authors:  Glenn Heller
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  An information-theoretic approach to surrogate-marker evaluation with failure time endpoints.

Authors:  Assam Pryseley; Abel Tilahun; Ariel Alonso; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  A Study of R2 Measure under the Accelerated Failure Time Models.

Authors:  Priscilla H Chan; Ronghui Xu; Christina D Chambers
Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 1.118

4.  Collaborative Cross mice and their power to map host susceptibility to Aspergillus fumigatus infection.

Authors:  Caroline Durrant; Hanna Tayem; Binnaz Yalcin; James Cleak; Leo Goodstadt; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Richard Mott; Fuad A Iraqi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Impact of bariatric surgery on life expectancy in severely obese patients with diabetes: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Daniel P Schauer; David E Arterburn; Edward H Livingston; Karen J Coleman; Steve Sidney; David Fisher; Patrick OʼConnor; David Fischer; Mark H Eckman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Semi-parametric regression model for survival data: graphical visualization with R.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

7.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Preoperative Prognostic Prediction Nomogram in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Choi; Yun-Suhk Suh; Yunhee Choi; Jiyeon Han; Tae Han Kim; Shin-Hoo Park; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Prediction Accuracy Measures for a Nonlinear Model and for Right-Censored Time-to-Event Data.

Authors:  Gang Li; Xiaoyan Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Identifying common prognostic factors in genomic cancer studies: a novel index for censored outcomes.

Authors:  Sigrid Rouam; Thierry Moreau; Philippe Broët
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The relation between the incidence of hypernatremia and mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Umberto Maggiore; Edoardo Picetti; Elio Antonucci; Elisabetta Parenti; Giuseppe Regolisti; Mario Mergoni; Antonella Vezzani; Aderville Cabassi; Enrico Fiaccadori
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.